Abstract
Hybridization is widespread in fish and constitutes an important mechanism in fish speciation. There is, however, little knowledge about hybridization in mormyrids. F1-interspecies hybrids between Campylomormyrus tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀ were investigated concerning: (1) fertility; (2) survival of F2-fish and (3) new gene combinations in the F2-generation concerning the structure of the electric organ and features of the electric organ discharge. These F1-hybrids achieved sexual maturity at about 12–13.5 cm total length. A breeding group comprising six males and 13 females spawned 28 times naturally proving these F1-fish to be fertile. On average 228 eggs were spawned, the average fertilization rate was 47.8%. Eggs started to hatch 70–72 h after fertilization, average hatching rate was 95.6%. Average mortality rate during embryonic development amounted to 2.3%. Average malformation rate during the free embryonic stage was 27.7%. Exogenous feeding started on day 11. In total, we raised 353 normally developed larvae all of which died consecutively, the oldest specimen reaching an age of 5 months. During survival, the activities of the larval and adult electric organs were recorded and the structure of the adult electric organ was investigated histologically.
Introduction
There is increasing evidence for hybridization constituting an important speciation mechanism both in plants and animals (Stebbins 1950; Dowling and Secor 1997; Barton 2008). Interspecies hybrids are characterized by new gene combinations leading to specific anatomical, physiological and behavioural features. While hybrids among closely related lineages may exhibit heterosis, i.e., high viability, fast growth, better physiological conditions and higher production (Darwin 1876; Wakchaure et al. 2015), genetic incompatibilities typically occur in hybrids of more distantly related lineages and may constitute a postzygotic isolation mechanism among species, leading to low viability, high mortality rate and low fertility or sterility (Tischler 1907; Walker 1926; Mayr 1970; Wu 1992).
Numerous examples of hybrids between species are known from birds (Grant and Grant 1992) and mammals (Gray 1972). The most well-known hybrids of mammals are the red wolf (hybridization of the gray wolf C. lupus and coyotes) (Wayne and Jenks 1991), grolar bear (cross between male braun bear and female polar bear) (Cahill et al. 2013; Kumar et al. 2017), liger (cross between male lion and female tiger) (Gray 1972; Li et al. 2016), leopon (cross between male leopard and female lion), zorse (cross between male horse and female zebra), zony (cross between male zebra and female horse), camas (cross between male dromedary camel and female llama) (Bonnicksen 2009), wolphin (cross between male false killer whale Pseudorca crassidens and female bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus) (Klemm et al. 1995). However, most of these hybrids are uncommon in nature and have been bred for genetical and medical investigations (Bonnicksen 2009).
Among fish, natural hybridization occurs more commonly than in other vertebrate taxa (Schwartz 1972; Campton 1987; Leary et al. 1995; Allendorf and Waples 1996). In more than 19.7% of fish families worldwide hybrids have been observed (Nelson 1994). In marine species, hybrids are widely found in the families belonging to the Atherinomorpha and Percomorpha (Schwartz 1972, 2001). Hybrids in freshwater fish have been documented in 30 families and mainly occur in the Acipenseridae (sturgeons), Cyprinidae (minnows or carps), Esocidae (pikes), Salmonidae (salmonids), Centrarchidae (sunfishes) and Percidae (perches) (Schwartz 1981, 2001). In addition, hybrids are often found in families, the representatives of which inhabit both freshwater and marine habitats, such as the Cichlidae (cichlids), Poeciliidae (poeciliids) and Moronidae (temperate basses) (Schwartz 2001).
Molecular genetic studies have repeatedly shown that hybridisation in fish is a common phenomenon and is often detected as an ancient introgression (Schliewen and Klee 2004; Herder et al. 2006; Schwarzer et al. 2012a, b; Meier et al. 2017; MacGuigan and Near 2019).
In the freshwater family of the weakly electric Mormyridae (elephant fish) with more than 200 species (Lavoué et al. 2003), natural hybrids are only rarely observed. Natural hybridization has been found only in the genus Paramormyrops, which contains 22 species (Lavoué et al. 2008): hybrids were observed between morphs of the Paramormyrops magnostipes species complex characterized by differences of their electric organ discharge (EOD) (Arnegard et al. 2005). In Paramormyrops kingsleyae natural hybrids were observed among morphs occurring in geographic proximity (Gallant et al. 2011). Sullivan et al. (2004) discuss past introgression (i.e., hybridisation) in Paramormyrops inferred from mitochondrial data.
Recently, intra- and inter-genus-hybrids between species of the mormyrid genus Campylomormyrus and the genera Gnathonemus, Mormyrus and Hyppopotamyrus have been produced by artificial reproduction and investigated concerning the anatomy of the electric organs (EOs) and the EODs, relative to those of the parent species (Kirschbaum et al. 2016). For example, C. compressirostris and C. tamandua possess adult electric organs with considerable anatomical differences: the electrocytes of C. compressirostris have a posterior position of the main stalk, whereas those of C. tamandua are characterized by an anterior position of the stalks, which are smaller and penetrate the electrocytes. Both species produce short duration EODs of about 200 µs (C. compressirostris) and 300 µs (C. tamandua). The EOD of C. compressirostris is biphasic, while C. tamandua produces a triphasic EOD comprising a first short, head negative phase followed by a head positive and head negative phase (Paul et al. 2015). The F1-hybrids produce an EOD with four phases and they possess an electric organ with a posterior position of the main stalk and double penetrations (Kirschbaum et al. 2016).
The aims of this study were: (1) to find out if these F1-hybrids were fertile and were able to produce F2-fish; (2) to investigate the anatomy of the EO and the EOD in F2-fish which are expected to carry new gene combinations for these features; (3) to determine segregation of phenotypic traits (EO histology, EOD), pointing towards novel allelic combinations at underlying genetic loci.
Materials and methods
Animals and experimental tanks
The F1-hybrids between C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀, which we used in this study, are those fish which had been used before for the artificial reproduction of F2-hybrids (Kirschbaum et al. 2016). They comprised 32 fish. We devided them in two breeding groups of 19 (Fig. 1) and 13 fish, respectively.
Morphology of C. tamandua and C. compressirostris and of their F1-hybrids. The appropriate electric organ discharges are also indicated. Note that the EODs of the parent species and those of the hybrids are not shown at the same time scale. Males can be differentiated from the females by the modified anal fin
The breeding tanks had the following dimensions: 155 × 70 × 60 cm. These tanks were equipped with a foam filter, a recurrent water pump behind the filter, an air supplier and plastic tubes of sizes 50 × 30 cm and of different diameter about 5–10 cm as hiding places. To protect eggs from foraging a grid was placed on the bottom of the aquarium.
Adult fish were fed twice daily with live Chaoborus (Corethra) and chironomid larvae or frozen larvae. To raise the fry, eggs were collected from inside the protecting cage the morning after spawning and were put into Petri dishes (ø = 8.6 cm, 1.5 cm high) with various densities between 5 and 10 eggs per dish. One day old eggs were checked if they were fertilized or unfertilized. Only fertilized eggs were selected for further incubation in water of the breeding tank. Incubation was performed in an incubator at 27 ± 0.5 °C or at room temperature (23–25 °C). After hatching, free embryos were transferred into new Petri dishes and tap water (conductivity ca. 700 µs/cm; pH ca. 8) was added gradually to the water of the breeding tank to rear them. One week after hatching the free embryos could be raised in tap water. About 1 month after hatching, the larvae were transferred into quadrangular petri dishes (10 × 10 × 2 cm) and raised at room temperature. From the beginning of exogenous feeding up to about 30–40 mm long juveniles, newly hatched Artemia nauplii were offered as food. Thereafter, small chironomid larvae were additionally provided. Larvae and juvenile fish between 15 and 40 mm total length were kept in plastic boxes (20 × 10 × 5 cm) equipped with aeration. Thereafter, the fish were transferred into small aquaria (30 × 20 × 20 cm) equipped with a foam filter, aeration and various types of hiding-places: broken plant pots, PVC pipes of 3 cm diameter, gravel (ca. 2–4 cm) and drift wood.
Manipulation of environmental factors
For breeding, the fish were subjected to a decrease of water conductivity over several weeks to imitate the rainy season conditions (Schugardt and Kirschbaum 2004). The temperature ranged between 25 and 28 °C.
Temperature and water conductivity were measured daily with a conductivity meter (WTW Multi 340i; WTW Wissenschaftlich–Technische Werkstätten, 82,362 Weilheim–Germany). pH was measured once a week with a pH meter (WTW Multi 340i; with the PH electrode SenTix 41; WTW Wissenschaftlich–Technische Werkstätten, 82,362 Weilheim–Germany).
Photoperiod was held constant at 12L:12D (light from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) by a time switch. In summer, however, some diffuse light penetrated the opaque windows of the aquarium room.
Histological techniques
The EOs were subjected to anatomical examinations via light microscopy. Three F2-hybrids were fixed shortly after death by immersion in 4% formalin and the caudal peduncle was cut off. Dehydration and embedding in paraffin followed conventional techniques (Mulisch and Welsch 2010). The EO was sectioned serially at 4–6 µm thickness in the transverse or sagittal plane using a Leica 2035 Biocut microtome. Sections were mounted on glycerin/albumin-coated slides. Following deparaffination and rehydration, sections were stained with Azan or HE (Mulisch and Welsch 2010), dehydrated and coverslipped with DePeX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich). Sections were investigated with a Leica microscope DM4000B. Pictures were taken and processed using the Leica DFC 480 camera together with the Leica IM software version 4.0.
Photography
Eggs, embryos, free embryos and up to 15 mm long larvae were recorded with a Leica S6E binocular fitted with a Canon Powershot S50 digital camera. Photos of older larvae, juveniles and adults were taken with a digital camera Canon EOS 350D and Canon EOS 100D. Pictures of eggs, embryos and early free embryos were taken from live specimens. All photos of later free embryos, larvae, juveniles, and adults were documented from anaesthetized fish.
Oscilloscope recordings
The development of the EOD of the individual specimens was displayed and recorded using a Tektronix TDS 3012B digital phosphor oscilloscope (maximum sampling rate 1.25 GS/s; 9 bit vertical resolution) with a Tektronix ADA 400A differential preamplifier (variable gain from 0.1 × up to 100×; bandwidth 100 Hz – > 1 MHz). We used the > 1 MHz position to avoid any limitation during recording. The oscilloscope and preamplifier were AC coupled.
Larvae up to a size of ca. 30 mm were placed into a small cube-like plastic container of 7.5 cm × 5 cm with water level of 1.5 cm; bigger larvae, juvenile and adult fish were measured in a bigger plastic container of 30 cm × 15 cm with water level from 3 to 10 cm. Containers for EOD measurements were filled with water from the keeping tank (conductivity 600–800 µs/cm, temperature 23–25 °C, pH 6–8) and equipped with a compartment adjustable to restrict the movement of the fish. For EOD measurement, the positive electrode was positioned a few centimeter away from the head of the fish and the negative electrode beyond the caudal fin.
EODs were recorded twice a month during the larval stage and once a month during the juvenile stage.
Results
Breeding experiments with F1-hybrids (C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀)
The 32 F1-hybrids were divided into two potential breeding groups with 13 and 19 fish, respectively. With the breeding group comprising 19 fish (Fig. 1), we conducted a breeding experiment by lowering the water conductivity for a period of 360 days (Fig. 2; Table 1). During this period 28 natural spawnings occurred. The number of spawned eggs ranged between 16 and 1039 (average 228), the fertilization rate between 9.0 and 87.4% (average 47.8%). The weakly sticky eggs (diameter 1.2–1.3 mm) started to hatch 70–72 h after fertilization, the range of hatching rate was between 73.7 and 100% (average 95.6%).
Breeding experiment with 19 F1-hybrids (6 males, 13 females) (C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀) for a period of 360 days. Red arrows indicate natural spawnings. Oviposited eggs were always fertilized (see Table 1). Triangle indicates successful artificial reproduction (see Kirschbaum et al. 2016). On day 260 the three biggest males were taken out of the breeding tank and were returned on day 337 (grey arrows). Note the stop and start of spawning activity
The 19 specimens of this breeding group comprised 6 males and 13 females (Fig. 1). As mormyrids spawn during the night (Kirschbaum 1987; Schugardt and Kirschbaum 1998), we were not able to observe spawning behavior in these fish.
On day 260 of the breeding experiment (Fig. 2) we took out the three largest males (Fig. 1) for subsequent backcross experiments (not reported in this paper). From that day on no further spawning activity was observed. On day 337 of the breeding experiment we returned the three large males to the original breeding group and a few days later spawning started again (Fig. 2).
From the 28 natural spawnings obtained from the breeding group with the 19 fish, we selected 11 spawnings to determine developmental parameters (Table 2).
Detailed ontogenetic description of the F2-hybrids
In Fig. 3 we describe the basic morphological development of the F2-hybrids. One day old eggs show a dense mass of cells (a blastula; Fig. 3a); a day later the early embryo is visible (Fig. 3b), which at day 2 has progressed in development (Fig. 3c). The embryos hatch on day 3 (Fig. 3d) and are characterized by a large yolk sac, a large embryological fin fold and a small eye. Figure 3e shows the free embryo at day 7; the yolk sac has decreased in size, the eye is more developed, the mouth has opened and dorsal and ventral fins start to differentiate. In the 9 days old free embryo (Fig. 3f) black pigment has developed on the head, a gas vesicle is seen in the otic vesicle, the fin rays of the caudal fin are obvious and some skeletal elements of the caudal plate are visible. The 11 days old embryo (Fig. 3g) starts exogenous feeding, this stage is then termed larva. At day 30 (Fig. 3h) the larva is almost completely black and the paired and unpaired fins are well developed. This morphological development has progressed in the 50 days old larva (Fig. 3i). As there are still some remnants of the embryological fin fold present on the caudal peduncle this stage is still termed a larva. Further morphological development is shown in Fig. 7 along with the description of the EOD ontogeny.
Early ontogenetic development of F2-hybrids (C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀). a Three hours old egg with a blastula (bl). b One day old early embryo. c Two day old embryo prior to hatching. d Four day old free embryo just after hatching. e Seven day old embryo. The yolk sac has decreased in size, the eye is more developed than in the 7 day old embryo, the mouth (arrow) has opened, and dorsal (df) and anal fins (af) start to differentiate. f Nine day old embryo. Black pigment has started to develop on the head (arrow); fin rays of the caudal fin (fr) are recognisable. g 11 day old embryo at the start of exogenous feeding. Yolk sac is nearly entirely resorbed; head and eyes are well pigmented; liver (li) and intestine (in) are recognisable. h Thirty day old larva. Paired and unpaired fins are well developed; the body is fully pigmented. i Larva 50 days old; remnants of the embryological fin fold (ff) are still present on the caudal peduncle. YI layer of yolk syncytium, np neural plate, hr prospective brain region, tr prospective trunc region, C-e c-shaped embryo, pf pectoral fin, vf ventral fin, ov otic vesicle, hh hypural plates
In addition to the normally developing embryos and larvae we also observed some mortality during embryogenesis and the free embryonic stage (Table 2): mortality during the embryonic development ranged between 0 and 6% (mean 2.3%), and the proportion of malformation during the free embryonic stage ranged between 11.1 and 42.9% (mean 27.7%). In Fig. 4 we show some typical malformations during the free embryonic stage. The vertebral column is directed upwards (Fig. 4a), there may be a kick in the middle of the vertebral column (Fig. 4b), or the rear part of the body is turned downwards (Fig. 4c) or upwards (Fig. 4d). Some specimens are completely distorted and abnormalities in the blood circulation seem to occur (Fig. 4e, f). About 65% of the free embryos with malformations showed abnormalities concerning the vertebral column as shown in Fig. 4, about 20% are characterized by abnormalities of the circulatory system and ca. 15% had a malformed yolk sac. Specimens with these malformations in general did not survive for more than 14 days.
For the determination of the cumulative mortality, we selected the fish from the artificial reproduction (40 fertilized eggs) (Kirschbaum et al. 2016) and three additional spawnings (100, 143, and 122 fertilized eggs, respectively) (Fig. 5; Table 1). The mortality during embryonic development is shown in Table 2. The four curves describing the cumulative mortality from the beginning of the fertilized stage on are quite similar and show that most of the fish die during the first 60 days of development. At that time, only about 10% of the hybrids had survived. Thereafter, only single individuals survived.
Cumulative mortality of four groups of F2-hybrids (C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀). Group 1 (artificial reproduction; see Kirschbaum et al. 2016) consisted in the beginning of 40 fertilized eggs, group 2 of 100, group 3 of 143 and group 4 of 122 fertilized eggs. Note that most of the fish had died after about 60 days
We selected seven individual F2-hybrids and monitored their individual growth (Fig. 6). Three fish from the artificial reproduction survived at maximum for about 50 days, two fish from the natural spawning from date 10.02.2017 (Table 2) survived for about 125 and 145 days, and two fish from the natural spawning from date 11.02.2017 survived for nearly 200 days at total lengths of 33 and 42 mm, respectively. The oldest specimen reached an age of about 190 days. This fish (No. 6) was measured several times between days 125 and days 190 and its growth curve indicates that growth slowed down during this period. This fish died at 42 mm total length from fungus infection after transfer into a small aquarium. During development the fish died for no obvious reasons, they in general seemed to be very sensitive to stress (e.g., during transfer from one jar to another).
Morphological and EO development of individual fish
One important aim of this study was the investigation of the anatomy of the EO and the ontogeny of the EOD of the F2-hybrids. As these hybrids were very sensitive and died prematurely, we could only monitor three individual fish at two different dates, at an age of 50 and 150 days, respectively (Fig. 7). When recorded at an age of 50 days, all three larvae still showed the larval EOD. However, the shape of the EOD differed slightly as did the duration of the head positive phase, amounting to about 300 µs (Table 3). The three fish, when measured 100 days later, had reached the juvenile stage, and all produced a biphasic EOD of about 170 µs duration, which is termed the juvenile EOD (Kirschbaum et al. 2016; Nguyen et al. 2017). Table 3 shows that the juvenile EODs of the three hybrids are quite similar concerning the total duration, the duration of the head positive and head negative phases and the ratio of the amplitude of the head positive and head negative phase. As these fish did not survive for a longer time, we could not continue to follow their EOD development.
Because of the limited number of larger F2-hybrids, we did not sacrifice live fish for the histological examination of the adult EO, we instead fixed three fish shortly after their death. Figure 8a shows a cross section of the EO of a 26.5 mm long specimen. The branching network of the stalk system is very well visible. However, the cross section does not allow to observe the position of the stalks (anterior or posterior) nor do they reveal penetrations of the stalk.
Photomicrographs of a cross section of a 26.5 mm long F2-hybrid (C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀) and sagittal sections of two F2-hybrids, 28 and 25 mm long, respectively. a Cross section at higher magnification visualizing the extremely branched stalk system. b Regularly arranged electrocytes (e) showing stalks (s) and penetrating stalks (arrows). c Main stalk (ms) situated on the posterior face (pf) of the electroccyte. d Stalks originating at the posterior face (pf) of the electrocyte; penetrations are missing. n nerve, vc vertebral column
We were able to investigate the EO in sagittal sections in two specimens (150 and 165 days old, respectively). The EO in both specimens shows a very regular arrangement of the individual electrocytes and the stalks originate at the posterior face of the electrocyte (Fig. 8b–d). In the 150 days old specimen (Fig. 8b) we found penetrations of the stalks through the main body of the electrocyte which we were not able to identify in the 165 day old specimen (Fig. 8c, d).
Discussion
Hybridization constitutes an important mechanism in fish speciation. However, there is little knowledge about hybridization in mormyrids. We investigated F1-interspecies hybrids between C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀ concerning: (1) fertility; (2) survival of F2-fish and (3) new allelic combinations in the F2-generation regarding the structure of the EO and features of the EOD.
These F1-hybrids proved to be fertile and spawned naturally over a prolonged period of time. The resulting F2-fish showed a very high mortality during the whole ontogeny and finally all fish had died after 5 months. During survival the activities of the larval and adult electric organs of a few specimens were recorded and the structure of the adult electric organ was investigated histologically.
Fertility of F1-hybrids
The breeding experiment with the 19 F1-hybrids (Fig. 2) showed that these fish spawned very regularly over a prolonged period of time. Each spawning event led to fertilized eggs (Table 1). The average fertilization rate of 47.8% represents a high value among Campylomormyrus species (Nguyen et al. 2017). This shows that at least those specimens, which participated in the spawnings, were fertile. Probably, only the largest F1-hybrid male(s) were involved in the spawnings if we consider the spawning behavior of the hybrids to be comparable to the parent species C. compressirostris (Nguyen et al. 2017) and C. tamandua (Schugardt and Kirschbaum 1998). Indeed, when the three large males (Fig. 2) were taken out of the breeding tank, spawnings immediately stopped (Fig. 2), but started again when these males were put back to the breeding tank. We do not know why the three smaller males (Fig. 1) were not able to initiate successful spawnings. Possibly, they were not fertile. A definite answer about the fertility status of all the 19 specimens could only be gained via examination of the gonadal status of these specimens or breeding experiments with just a few specimens. However, breeding experiments with just a few specimens proved to be unsuccessful in C. compressirostris, because individual pairs did not successfully spawn (Nguyen et al. 2017).
Fertility of interspecific hybrids is quite common in fish and has been determined in 130 natural and 150 artificial performed crosses (Argue and Dunham 1999). Interspecific hybrids among salmonid fish such as Oncorhynchus mykiss × Oncorhynchus clarki, Salvelinus fontinalis × Salvelinus namaycush and S. fontinalis × Salvelinus alpinus are often fertile (Johnson et al. 1987). In the family Cichlidae hybrids of crosses of Haplochromis. elegans × H. nubilus, H. “black lividus” × H. nubilus and backcrosses F1 (H. burtoni × H. nubilus) × H. burtoni, F1 (H. burtoni × H. nubilus) × H. nubilus are also fertile (Crapon de Caprona and Fritzsch 1983). In the hybrid complex Rutilus alburnoides (Cyprinidae) research based on cytometric analysis of blood and sperm showed that both diploid and tetraploid hybrid males produced fertile sperm, but there are no data about fertility of triploid hybrids (Alves et al. 1999). In addition, F1-hybrids of roach × bream and backcrosses F1-hybrid × roach, roach × F1-hybrid and F1-hybrid × F1-hybrid were also shown to be fertile (Wood and Jordan 1987).
Features of reproductive biology of hybrids and parent species
The F1-hybrids produced eggs of about 1.2 mm in diameter. In contrast, the parent species produce larger eggs: the eggs of C. tamandua have a diameter of 2 mm (Schugardt und Kirschbaum 1998; Kirschbaum und Schugardt 2006); those of C. compressirostris 2.3 mm (Nguyen et al. 2017). Stickiness of eggs is not easy to quantify. Still, the eggs of the F1-hybrids seemed to be less sticky than those of both parent species (Kirschbaum and Schugardt 2002; Nguyen et al. 2017).
The number of spawned eggs varies within and among the parent species: C. compressirostris spawned between 38 and 246 eggs per fractional spawning (Nguyen et al. 2017), whereas C. tamandua, depending on the size of the females, spawned between 383 (mean) and 1108 eggs (mean) (Schugardt und Kirschbaum 1998). The F1-hybrids spawned between 16 and 1039 eggs per fractional spawning (Table 1). During the artificial reproduction of the F1-hybrids the smaller female released 80 eggs and the larger one 115 eggs. We, therefore, conclude that more than one female must have participated in the spawning events (Table 1) when more than 115 eggs were deposited in our breeding groups. This occurred repeatedly during the breeding experiment (Table 1).
The minimum size for sexual maturity for the males (identification of the males was based on the presence of the male-typical anal fin anatomy, see Fig. 1) was in the range of 12–13.5 cm total length. This is comparable to the situation in C. compressirostris (Paul et al. 2015; Nguyen et al. 2017). The males grew larger than the females (Fig. 1). This is also typical for Campylomormyrus species (Nguyen et al. 2017). Our conclusion, therefore, is that all the female-type fish over 12 cm total length are females. This was indeed confirmed by the artificial reproduction experiment: both, the 12 and 13 cm female-type fish, released eggs (Kirschbaum et al. 2016).
Mortality
Figure 5 and Table 2 show that the F2-hybrids had a high mortality. We suppose that three different kinds of deficiencies cause these deaths. (1) Mortality during embryogenesis was apparently caused by deficiencies during organogenesis (Table 2). (2) Many of the free embryos showed abnormalities of the vertebral column, the yolk sac, and the blood system (Fig. 4), which finally led to death. (3) Those fish which had started exogenous feeding around day 11 looked morphologically quite normal (Fig. 3g); however, most of them died up to an age of about 60 days (Fig. 5). They often looked a bit thin (Fig. 3h) and did not grow very well (Fig. 6). We suppose that in particular deficiencies at the level of feeding, nutrition and differentiation and function of the digestive tract are the main causes of death in addition to deficiencies at the level of the immune system (some fish died through infection with fungus).
We exclude raising conditions, in particular physico-chemical characteristics of the water, as causes for the death of the fish. We raised our larvae a few days after exogenous feeding in Berlin tap water at pH values around 8, conductivity values of about 700 µs/cm and temperatures between 23 and 28 °C. Under the same conditions several Campylomormyrus species including C. compressirostris were successfully raised (Nguyen et al. 2017) and about 80–95% of the larvae survived. Additional attempts to raise C. compressirostris and C. tamandua in Berlin tap water under semi-natural conditions revealed that at minimum 50% of the larvae survived (Hernandez Valencia 2019). About 20 ornamental freshwater fish species were raised successfully repeatedly in Berlin tap water (unpublished results).
EOD and EO characteristics of the F2-hybrids
The main aim of this study was the attempt to obtain F2-hybrids and to follow the ontogeny of the discharge of the adult electric organ in different specimens, because in the F2-generation, new allelic combinations occur, potentially translating into differences in the EO and the EOD.
Figure 5 shows that most larvae had died about 60 days after fertilization. The three 50 day old larvae investigated (Fig. 7) produced a larval EOD (Fig. 7a1–c1). The shape of the EOD varies as does the duration of the head positive phase (Table 3). These individual differences in the shape and duration of the larval EOD are peculiar as the larval EOD in general, as seen in the different species, is quite stable (Westby and Kirschbaum 1977; Baier et al. 2006; Werneyer and Kramer 2006).
The adult EOD emerges in Campylomormyrus larvae at a much later stage than 50 days after hatching (Nguyen et al. 2017). Figure 5 shows that at day 150 only very few larvae had survived for the recording of the adult EOD. The same three specimens, measured at day 50, produced at day 150 a biphasic EOD (Fig. 7), which represents a typical juvenile EOD found in both parent species (Kirschbaum et al. 2016; Nguyen et al. 2017). The differences in the shape and the duration of the individual phases (Table 3) between the three individuals are very small. Due to the subsequent death of all three specimens, we were not able to follow the further ontogenetic development of the adult EOD of these specimens nor of additional specimens. The biphasic EOD comprising a first head positive and a second head negative phase indicates that the main stalk is located at the posterior face of the electrocyte (Bass 1986) (see also below).
As mentioned above, we were able to investigate histologically the anatomy of the adult electric organ in three specimens only due to the limited availability of the larvae due to death. Figure 8a shows a cross section of the adult electric organ of a 26.5 mm larva comprising and a single large stalk, surrounded by nerve tissue, extending into many smaller stalks. This is a typical feature of both parent species, C. compressirostris and C. tamandua, respectively (Paul et al. 2015).
The two 150 and 165 day old specimens analysed based on the sagittal sections (Fig. 8b–d) show a divergent EO structure. In one specimen (150 days old) there are penetrations as found in the F1-hybrids (Kirschbaum et al. 2016), whereas such penetrations are missing in the 165 day old specimen, which is typical for C. compressirostris (Paul et al. 2015). This could indicate a different allelic combination at underlying genes in these F2-specimens. However, sample sizes are still far too small for any conclusive inference regarding co-segregating allelic combinations and phenotypic traits. Once the general feasibility of F2-production has been demonstrated here, we will aim for such an analysis in future studies.
Morphology of older larvae
The morphology of the three specimens whose EODs were investigated at day 150 was documented at the same time (Fig. 7). The pigmentation of the unpaired fins and of the body is different in all three specimens as is the morphology of the head. We suppose that these differences are due to new allelic combinations of the underlying genes in the F2-generation, as the pure species are characterized by a quite uniform morphology (Nguyen et al. 2017). Again, sample sizes were too small here to infer genes underlying these traits, which will be a definite goal of future studies.
Conclusion
Our results show for the first time that F1-intragenus hybrids in mormyrids (C. tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀) are fertile and can produce F2-offspring and behave during reproduction like a valid species. However, the F2-hybrids did not survive for more than 5 months. The genetic distance between the two parent species is quite large (Feulner et al. 2007; Lamanna et al. 2016). We also obtained F1-hybrids between additional Campylomormyrus species (Kirschbaum et al. 2016), which are genetically more closely related to each other (Feulner et al. 2007; Lamanna et al. 2016). These F1-hybrids would be ideal candidates for further breeding experiments to produce more viable F2-fish and to enable co-segregation studies between phenotypic traits and their underlying genes. Such analysis is greatly facilitated by available genomic resources of several species, namely full transcriptomes (Lamanna et al. 2014, 2015) which have been systematically surveyed for species-specific expressed single nucleotide polymorphisms related to the EOD (Canitz et al. 2019).
Change history
17 October 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-021-01513-2
References
Allendorf FW, Waples RS (1996) Conservation and genetics of salmonid fishes. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 238–280
Alves MJ, Coelho MM, Próspero MI, Collares-Pereira MJ (1999) Production of fertile unreduced sperm by hybrid males of the Rutilus alburnoides complex (Teleostei, Cyprinidae): an alternative route to genome tetraploidization in unisexuals. Genetics 151(1):277–283
Argue BJ, Dunham RA (1999) Hybrid fertility, introgression and backcrossing in fish. Rev Fish Sci 7(3–4):137–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641269908951360
Arnegard ME, Bogdanowicz SM, Hopkins CD (2005) Multiple cases of striking genetic similarity between alternate electric fish signal morphs in sympatry. Evol 59:324–343. https://doi.org/10.1554/04-237R
Baier B, Lamml M, Kramer B (2006) Ontogeny of electric organ discharge in two parapatric species of the dwarf stonebasher Pollimyrus castelnaui and P. marianne (Mormyridae, Teleostei). Acta Zool 87:209–214
Barton NH (2008) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10(3):551–568. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x
Bass AH (1986) Species differences in electric organs of mormyrids: substrates for species-typical electric organ discharge waveforms. J Comp Neurol 244:313–330
Bonnicksen AL (2009) Chimeras, hybrids, and interspecies research: politics and policymaking. DC Georgetown University Press, Washington
Cahill JA, Green RE, Fulton TL, Stiller M, Jay F, Ovsyanikov N, Salamzade R, John JS, Stirling I, Slatkin M, Shapiro B (2013) Genomic evidence for island population conversion resolves conflicting theories of polar bear evolution. PLoS Genet 9:1003345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003345
Campton DE (1987) Natural hybridization and introgression in fishes: methods of detection and genetic interpretations. In: Ryman N, Utter F (eds) Population genetics and fishery management. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 161–192
Canitz J, Kirschbaum F, Tiedemann R (2019) Transcriptome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms related to electric organ discharge differentiation among African weakly electric fish species. Preprint at Researchsquare. doi:10.21203/rs.2.9428/v1, under revision at PLoSONE
Crapon De Caprona MD, Fritzsch B (1983) Interspecific fertile hybrids of Haplochromine Cichlidae (Teleostei) and their possible importance for speciation. Neth J Zool 34(4):503–538. https://doi.org/10.1163/002829684X00272
Darwin C (1876) The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London
Dowling TE, Secor CL (1997) The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:593–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.593
Feulner PGD, Kirschbaum F, Mamonekene V, Ketmaier V, Tiedemann R (2007) Adaptive radiation in African weakly electric fish (Teleostei: Mormyridae: Campylomormyrus): a combined molecular and morphological approach. J Evol Biol 20:403–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01181.x
Gallant JR, Arnegard ME, Sullivan JP, Carlson BA, Hopkins CD (2011) Signal variation and its morphological correlates in Paramormyrops kingsleyae provide insight into the evolution of electrogenic signal diversity in mormyrid electric fish. J Comp Physiol A 197(8):799–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-011-0643-8
Grant PR, Grant BR (1992) Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193–197
Gray AP (1972) Mammalian hybrids: a check-list and bibliography, 2nd edn. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal
Herder F, Nolte AW, Pfaender J, Schwarzer J, Hadiaty RK, Schliewen UK (2006) Adaptive radiation and hybridisation in Wallace’s Dreamponds: evidence from sailfin silversides in the Malili Lakes of Sulawesi. Proc R Soc B 273:2209–2217. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3558
Hernandez Valencia E (2019) Hybridisation and raising experiments in mormyrids of the genus Campylomormyrus. Master Thesis, Humboldt University of Berlin
Johnson KR, Wright JE, May B (1987) Linkage relationships reflecting ancestral tetraploidy in salmonid fish. Genetics 116(4):579–591
Kirschbaum F (1987) Reproduction and development of the weakly electric fish Pollimyrus isidori (Mormyridae, Teleostei) in captivity. Environ Biol Fish 20:11–31
Kirschbaum F, Schugardt C (2002) Fortpflanzungsstrategien bei afrikanischen Nilhechten. Mormyridae Aquaristik Fachmagazin und Aquarium heute 34(165):72–77
Kirschbaum F, Schugardt C (2006) Fortpflanzungsstrategien und entwicklungsbiologische Aspekte bei südamerikanischen Messerfischen (Gymnotiformes) und afrikanischen Nilhechten (Mormyridae) - vergleichende Betrachtungen. In: Greven H, Riehl R (eds) Biologie der aquarienfische. Tetra Verlag GmbH, Berlin-Velten, pp 81–116
Kirschbaum F, Nguyen L, Baumgartner S, Chi L, Wolfart R, Elarbani K, Eppenstein H, Korniienko Y, Guido-Böhm L, Mamonekene V, Vater M (2016) Intragenus (Campylomormyrus) and intergenus hybrids in mormyrid fish: physiological and histological investigations of the electric organ ontogeny. J Physiol Paris 110:281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2017.01.003
Klemm EB, Reed SA, Pottenger FM, Porter C, Speitel TW (1995) The living ocean: Biology and technology of the marine environment, 3rd edn. Hawai’i Marine Science Studies (HMSS), Honolulu
Kumar V, Lammers F, Bidon T, Pfenninger M, Kolter L, Nilsson MA, Janke A (2017) The evolutionary history of bears is characterized by gene flow across species. Sci Rep 7:46487. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46487
Lamanna F, Kirschbaum F, Tiedemann R (2014) De novo assembly and characterization of the skeletal muscle and electric organ transcriptomes of the African weakly electric fish Campylomormyrus compressirostris (Mormyridae, Teleostei). Mol Ecol Resour 14(16):1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12260
Lamanna F, Kirschbaum F, Waurick I, Dieterich C, Tiedemann R (2015) Cross-tissue and cross-species analysis of gene expression in skeletal muscle and electric organ of African weakly-electric fish (Teleostei: Mormyridae). BMC Genomics 16:668
Lamanna F, Kirschbaum F, Tiedemann R (2016) Species delimitation and phylogenetic relationships in a genus of African weakly electric fish (Osteoglossiformes, Mormyridae, Campylomormyrus). Mol Phylog Evol 101:8–18
Lavoué S, Sullivan JP, Hopkins CD (2003) Phylogenetic utility of the first two introns of the S7 ribosomal protein gene in African electric fishes (Mormyroidea: Teleostei) and congruence with other molecular markers. Biol J Linn Soc 78:273–292. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00170.x
Lavoué S, Arnegard ME, Sullivan JP, Hopkins CD (2008) Petrocephalus of Odzala offer insights into evolutionary patterns of signal diversification in the Mormyridae, a family of weakly electrogenic fishes from Africa. J Physiol Paris 102:322–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008
Leary RF, Allendorf FW, Sage GK (1995) Hybridization and introgression between introduced and native fish. Am Fish Soc Symp 15:91–101
Li G, Davis BW, Eizirik E, Murphy WJ (2016) Phylogenomic evidence for ancient hybridization in the genomes of living cats (Felidae). Genome Res 26:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186668.114
MacGuigan DJ, Near TJ (2019) Phylogenomic signatures of ancient introgression in a Rogue Lineage of Darters (Teleostei: Percidae). Syst Biol 68(2):329–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy074
Mayr E (1970) Populations, species, and evolution: an abridgment of animal species and evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–82
Meier JI, Marques DA, Mwaiko S, Wagner CE, Excoffier L, Seehausen O (2017) Ancient hybridisation fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations. Nature Comm 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14363
Mulisch M, Welsch U (2010) Romeis-Mikroskopische technik, 18th edn. Spektrum, Heidelberg
Nelson JS (1994) Fishes of the world, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Nguyen MDL, Paul C, Mamonekene V, Bartsch P, Tiedemann R, Kirschbaum F (2017) Reproduction and development in some species of the weakly electric genus Campylomormyrus (Mormyridae, Teleostei). Environ Biol Fish 100:49–68
Paul C, Mamonekene V, Vater M, Feulner PG, Engelmann J, Tiedemann R, Kirschbaum F (2015) Comparative histology of the adult electric organ among four species of the genus Campylomormyrus (Teleostei: Mormyridae). J Comp Physiol A 201:357–374
Schliewen UK, Klee B (2004) Reticulate sympatric speciation in Cameroonian crater lake cichlids. Front Zool 1(5):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-1-5
Schugardt C, Kirschbaum F (1998) Sozial- und Fortpflanzungsverhalten von Mormyriden (Nilhechten). In: Greven H, Riehl R (eds) Verhalten der Aquarienfische. Brigit Schmettkamp, Bornheim, pp 87–98
Schugardt C, Kirschbaum F (2004) Control of gonad maturation and regression by experimental variation of environmental factors in the mormyrid fish Mormyrus rume proboscirostris. Environ Biol Fish 70:227–233
Schwartz FJ (1972) World literature to fish hybrids with an analysis by family, species, and Hybrid, 3rd edn. Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs
Schwartz FJ (1981) World literature to fish hybrids with an analysis by family, species, and hybrid: supplement 1, 750th edn. NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF
Schwartz FJ (2001) Freshwater and marine fish family hybrids: a worldwide changing scene revealed by the scientific literature. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 117(1):62–65
Schwarzer J, Swarz ER, Vreven E, Snoeks J, Cotterill FPD, Misof B, Schliewen UK (2012a) Repeated trans-watershed hybridisation among haplochromine cichlids (Cichlidae) was triggered by Neogene landscape evolution. Proc R Soc B 279:4389–4398. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1667
Schwarzer J, Misof B, Schliewen UK (2012b) Speciation within genomic networks: a case study based on Steatocranus cichlids of the lower Congo rapids. J Evol Biol 25:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02409.x
Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York
Sullivan JP, Lavoué S, Arnegard ME, Hopkins CD (2004) AFLPs resolve phylogeny and reveal mitochondrial introgression within a species flock of African electric fish (Mormyroidea: Teleostei). Evol 58:825–841
Tischler G (1907) Weitere Untersuchungen über Sterilitatsursachen bei Bastard-pflanzen. Ber Deutsch Bot Gesells 25:376–383
Wakchaure R, Ganguly S, Praveen K, Sharma S, Kumar A, Mahajan T, Qadri K (2015) Importance of heterosis in animals: a review. Int J Adv Eng Tech Innov Sc (IJAETIS) 1(1):1–5
Walker FN (1926) Sterility among hybrids. Can Med Assoc J 16(6):661–665
Wayne RK, Jenks SM (1991) Mitochondrial DNA analysis implying extensive hybridization of the endangered red wolf Canis rufus. Nature 351:565–568
Werneyer M, Kramer B (2006) Ontogeny development of electric-organ discharges in a mormyrid fish, the bulldog Marcusenius macrolepidotus (South African form). J Fish Biol 69:1190–1201
Westby GWM, Kirschbaum F (1977) Emergence and development of the electric organ discharge in the mormyrid fish, Pollimyrus isidori. J Comp Physiol 122(2):251–271
Wood AB, Jordan DR (1987) Fertility of roach × bream hybrids, Rutilus rutilus (L.) × Abramis brama (L.), and their identification. J Fish Biol 30(3):249–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05750.x
Wu CI (1992) A note on Haldane’s rule: hybrid inviability versus hybrid sterility. Evol 46(5):1584–1587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01152.x
Acknowledgements
These investigations were possible thanks to the financial support by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom in the framework of a scholarship for international Ph.D.-students. We thank H. Höft and S. Abelt for technical assistance and support. We thank Prof. Dr. Krause for his willingness to act as first supervisor of the Ph.D. project of Yevheniia Korniienko.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All representative national and international parameter for the animal husbandry and their utilization during investigation were followed. The Deputy of Animal Welfare of our institution and the responsible state administration has been given notice of the implementation of our experiments, according to the current German Protection of Animal Act.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access order.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Korniienko, Y., Nguyen, L., Baumgartner, S. et al. Intragenus F1-hybrids of African weakly electric fish (Mormyridae: Campylomormyrus tamandua ♂ × C. compressirostris ♀) are fertile. J Comp Physiol A 206, 571–585 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-020-01425-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-020-01425-7
Keywords
- Mormyridae
- Campylomormyrus
- F1-hybrids
- F2-hybrids
- Fertility