Both behavioral receptivity and neural sensitivity to acoustic mate attraction signals vary across the reproductive cycle, particularly in seasonally breeding animals. Across a variety of taxa receptivity to signals increases, as does peripheral auditory sensitivity, as females transition from a non-breeding to breeding condition. We recently documented decreases in receptivity to acoustic mate attraction signals and circulating hormone levels, but an increase in peripheral auditory sensitivity to call-like stimuli following oviposition in Cope’s gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis). However, it is not known if changes in auditory sensitivity are confined to the frequency range of calls, or if they result from more generalized changes in the auditory periphery. Here, we used auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to evaluate peripheral frequency sensitivity in female Cope’s gray treefrogs before and after oviposition. We found lower ABR thresholds, greater ABR amplitudes, and shorter ABR latencies following oviposition. Changes were most pronounced and consistent at lower frequencies associated with the amphibian papilla, but were also detectable at higher frequencies corresponding to the tuning of the basilar papilla. Furthermore, only ABR latencies were correlated with circulating steroid hormones (testosterone). Changes in peripheral processing may result from changes in metabolic function or sensorineural adaptation to chorus noise.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adkins-Regan E (1998) Hormonal mechanisms of mate choice. Am Zool 38:166–178
Backus BC, Guinan JJ (2006) Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2889–2904
Bastien B, Farley G, Ge F, Malin JS, Simon-Plumb CL, Pulley DM, Stowell N, Yang C, Baugh AT (2018) The waiting and mating game: condition dependent mate sampling in female gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). Front Ecol Evol Behav Evol Ecol 6:140
Baugh AT, Bastien B, Still M, Stowell N (2018) Validation of water-borne steroid hormones in a tropical frog (Physalaemus pustulosus). Gen Comp Endocrinol 261:67–80
Beatini JR, Proudfoot GA, Gall MD (2018) Frequency sensitivity in Northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus). J Comp Physiol A 204:145–154
Bee MA (2015) Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem. Int J Psychophysiol 95:216–237
Boersma P, Weenink D (2017) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6. 0. 29, retrieved 3 June 2018 from http://www.praat.org/
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Brenowitz EA (2004) Plasticity of the adult avian song control system. Ann New York Acad Sci 1016:560–585
Buerkle NP, Schrode KM, Bee MA (2014) Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 178:68–81
Caras ML, Remage-Healey L (2016) Modulation of peripheral and central auditory processing by estrogens in birds. In: Bass A, Sisneros J, Popper A, Fay R (eds) Hearing and hormones. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 57. Springer, Cham
Caras ML, Brenowitz E, Rubel EW (2010) Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel’s white-crowned sparrow. J Comp Physiol A 196:581–599
Church GT, Cudahy EA (1984) The time course of the acoustic reflex. Ear Hear 5:235–242
Cummings ME, Bernal XE, Reynaga R, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2008) Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females. J Exp Bio 211:1203–1210
Dobie RA, Humes LE (2017) Commentary on the regulatory implications of noise-induced cochlear neuropathy. Int J Audiol 56(sup1):74–78
Finneran JJ (2015) Noise-induced hearing loss in marine mammals: a review of temporary threshold shift studies from 1996 to 2015. J Acoust Soc Amer 138(3):1702–1726
Forlano PM, Sisneros JA, Rohmann KN, Bass AH (2015) Neuroendocrine control of seasonal plasticity in the auditory and vocal systems of fish. Front Neuroendocrinol 37:129–145
Forlano PM, Maruska KP, Sisneros JA, Bass AH (2016) Hormone-dependent plasticity of auditory systems in fishes. In: Bass A, Sisneros J, Popper A, Fay R (eds) Hearing and hormones. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 57. Springer, Cham
Gall MD, Wilczynski W (2015) Hearing conspecific vocal signals alters peripheral auditory sensitivity. Proc R Soc B 282:20150749
Gall MD, Wilczynski W (2016) The effects of call-like masking diminish after nightly exposure to conspecific choruses in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). J Exp Biol 219(1295):1302
Gall MD, Salameh TS, Lucas JR (2013) Songbird frequency selectivity and temporal resolution vary with sex and season. Proc R Soc B 280:20122296
Gall MD, Bee MA, Baugh AT (2019) The difference a day makes: breeding remodels hearing, hormones and behavior in female Cope’s gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis). Hormones Behav 108:62–72
Gerhardt HC (1975) Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads. J Comp Physiol A 102:1–12
Gridi-Papp M, Feng AS, Shen JX, Yu ZL, Narins PM (2008) Active control of ultrasonic hearing in frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11013–11018
Guinan JJ (1996) Physiology of olivocochlear efferents. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) The Cochlea. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, pp 435–502
Guinan JJ (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 6:589–607
Hall IC, Woolley SMN, Kwong-Brown U, Kelley DB (2016) Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus). J Comp Physiol A 202:17–34
Henry KS, Lucas JR (2009) Vocally correlated seasonal auditory variation in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). J Exp Biol 212:3817–3822
Hetherington TE (1994) The middle ear muscle of frogs does not modulate tympanic responses to sound. J Acoust Soc Am 95:2122–2125
Kelley DB (1980) Auditory and vocal nuclei in the frog brain concentrate sex hormones. Science 207:553–555
Kirk EC, Smith DW (2003) Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system. J Assoc Acoust Res 4:445–465
Lea J, Halliday T, Dyson M (2000) Reproductive stage and history affect the phonotactic preferences of female midwife toads, Alytes muletensis. Anim Behav 60:423–427
Leary CJ (2009) Hormones and acoustic communication in anuran amphibians. Int Comp Biol 49:452–470
Lynch KS, Wilczynski W (2005) Gonadal steroid fluctuations in a tropically breeding female anuran. Gen Comp Endocrinol 43:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.02.023
Lynch KS, Rand AS, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (2005) Plasticity in female mate choice associated with changing reproductive states. Anim Behav 69:689–699
Mason MJ (2007) Pathways for sound transmission to the inner ear in amphibians. In: Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Hearing and sound communication in amphibians. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 28. Springer, New York
Miranda JA, Wilczynski W (2009a) Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response. J Comp Physiol A 195:341–349
Miranda JA, Wilczynski W (2009b) Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Hear Res 252:79–88
Moller AR (1974) The acoustic middle ear muscle reflex. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol V/1: auditory system. Springer, Berlin, pp 519–548
Murphy CG, Gerhardt HC (1996) Evaluating the design of mate-choice experiments: the effect of amplexus on mate choice by female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa. Anim Behav 51:881–890. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0092
Nityananda V, Bee MA (2011) Finding your mate at a cocktail party: frequency separation promote auditory stream segregation of concurrent voices in multi-species frog choruses. PLoS One 6:e21191
Ophir AG, Schrader SB, Gillooly JF (2010) Energetic cost of calling: general constraints and species-specific differences. J Evol Biol 23:1564–1569
Penna M, Narins PM (1989) Effects of acoustic overstimulation on spectral and temporal processing in the amphibian auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 85:1617–1629
Prestwich KN (1994) The energetics of acoustic signaling in anurans and insects. Am Zool 34:625–643
Ptacek MB, Gerhardt HC, Sage RD (1994) Speciation by polyploidy in treefrogs: multiple origins of the tetraploid, Hyla versicolor. Evolution 48:898–908
Ryan AF, Kujawa SG, Hammill T, Le Prell C, Kil J (2016) Temporary and permanent noise-induced threshold shifts: a review of basic and clinical observations. Otol Neurotol 37(8):e271–e275
Salvi RJ (2008) Overview: regeneration and repair. In: Salvi RJ, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hair cell regeneration, repair, and protection. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 33. Springer, New York
Saunders JC, Duncan RK, Doan DE, Werner YL (2000) The middle ear of reptiles and birds. In: Dooling RJ, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Comparative hearing: birds and reptiles. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 13. Springer, New York
Schmidt AK, Riede K, Römer H (2011) High background noise shapes selective auditory filters in a tropical cricket. J Exp Biol 214:1754–1762
Schrode K, Ward JL, Vélez A, Bee MA (2012) Female preferences for spectral call properties in the western genetic lineage of Cope’s gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1595–1606
Schrode KM, Buerkle NP, Brittan-Powell EF, Bee MA (2014) Auditory brainstem responses in Cope’s gray treefrog (Hyla chrysocelis): effects of frequency, level, sex, and size. J Comp Physiol A 200:221–238
Schwartz JJ, Huth K, Hutchin T (2004) How long do females really listen? Assessment time for female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Anim Behav 68:533–540
Simmons DD, Meenderink SWF, Vassilakis PN (2007) Anatomy, physiology, and function of the auditory end-organs in the frog inner ear. In: Narins PA, Feng AS, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Hearing and sound communication in amphibians, vol 29. Springer, New York, pp 184–220
Simmons DD, Lohr R, Wotring H, Burton MD, Hooper RA, Baird RA (2014) Recovery of otoacoustic emissions after high-level noise exposure in the American bullfrog. J Exp Biol 217:1626–1636. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.090092
Sisneros JA, Forlano PM, Deitcher DL, Bass AH (2004) Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity leads to adaptive coupling of sender and receiver. Science 305:404–407
Tanner JC, Bee MA (2018) Within-individual variation in sexual displays: signal or noise? Behav Ecol 1:2. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary165
Thomas RJ, Cuthill IC, Goldsmith AR, Cosgrove DF, Lidgate HC, Burdett Proctor SL (2003) The trade-off between singing and mass gain in a daytime-singing bird, the European robin. Behaviour 40:387–404
Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ (1981) Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics. Science 214:677–678
Ward JL, Love EK, Vélez A, Buerkle NP, O’Bryan LR, Bee MA (2013) Multitasking males and multiplicative females: dynamic signaling and receiver preferences in Cope’s grey treefrog. Anim Behav 86:231–243
Wever EG (1985) The amphibian ear. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wilczynski W, Burmeister SS (2016) Effects of steroid hormones on hearing and communication in frogs. In: Bass A, Sisneros J, Popper A, Fay R (eds) Hearing and hormones. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 57. Springer, Cham
Witte K, Farris HE, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (2005) How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning. Behav Ecol 16:557–571
Wong A, Gall MD (2015) Frequency sensitivity in the auditory periphery of male and female black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus). Zoology 118:357–363
Zelick R, Narins PM (1985) Temporary threshold shift, adaptation, and recovery characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers. Hear Res 17:161–176
Zhang D, Cui J, Tang Y (2012) Plasticity of peripheral auditory frequency sensitivity in Emei music frog. PLoS One 7:e45792
Zuk M, Kolluru GR (1998) Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quart Rev Biol 73:415–438
We thank members of the Bee lab, and Jessie Tanner in particular, for assistance in collecting frogs and John Moriarty and the Three Rivers Park District for after-hours access to frog ponds.
Funding was provided by the Michener Faculty Fellowship at Swarthmore College to ATB, a National Science Foundation grant to MAB (IOS 1452831), and the Vassar College Dean of Faculty office to MDG.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. Animal collections were made under Special Permit 21947 from the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Minnesota (Protocol 1701-34456A, approved 3 March 2017). This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Alexander T. Baugh and Megan D. Gall are co-first authors.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Baugh, A.T., Bee, M.A. & Gall, M.D. The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis). J Comp Physiol A 205, 629–639 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-019-01354-0
- Auditory brainstem response