Abstract
In many communication systems, information is encoded in the temporal pattern of signals. For rhythmic signals that carry information in specific frequency bands, a neuronal system may profit from tuning its inherent filtering properties towards a peak sensitivity in the respective frequency range. The cricket Gryllus bimaculatus evaluates acoustic communication signals of both conspecifics and predators. The song signals of conspecifics exhibit a characteristic pulse pattern that contains only a narrow range of modulation frequencies. We examined individual neurons (AN1, AN2, ON1) in the peripheral auditory system of the cricket for tuning towards specific modulation frequencies by assessing their firing-rate resonance. Acoustic stimuli with a swept-frequency envelope allowed an efficient characterization of the cells’ modulation transfer functions. Some of the examined cells exhibited tuned band-pass properties. Using simple computational models, we demonstrate how different, cell-intrinsic or network-based mechanisms such as subthreshold resonances, spike-triggered adaptation, as well as an interplay of excitation and inhibition can account for the experimentally observed firing-rate resonances. Therefore, basic neuronal mechanisms that share negative feedback as a common theme may contribute to selectivity in the peripheral auditory pathway of crickets that is designed towards mate recognition and predator avoidance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barlow HB (1961) Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith WA (ed) Sensory communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 217–234
Benda J, Hennig RM (2008) Spike-frequency adaptation generates intensity invariance in a primary auditory interneuron. J Comput Neurosci 24(2):113–136
Benda J, Herz AVM (2003) A universal model for spike-frequency adaptation. Neural Comput 15(11):2523–2564
Bennet-Clark HC (1989) Songs and the physics of sound production. In: Huber F, Moore TE, Loher W (eds) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell UP, Ithaca, pp 227–261
Borst A, Haag J (1996) The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells: I. Passive membrane properties. J Comput Neurosci 3(4):313–336
Borst A, Theunissen FE (1999) Information theory and neural coding. Nat Neurosci 2(11):947–957
Boyan GS, Fullard JH (1988) Information processing at a central synapse suggests a noise filter in the auditory pathway of the noctuid moth. J Comp Physiol A 164(2):251–258
Boyan GS, Williams JLD (1982) Auditory neurones in the brain of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): ascending interneurones. J Insect Physiol 28(6):493–501
Bürck M, van Hemmen JL (2009) Neuronal identification of signal periodicity by balanced inhibition. Biol Cybern 100(4):261–270
Bush SL, Schul J (2006) Pulse-rate recognition in an insect: evidence of a role for oscillatory neurons. J Comp Physiol A 192(2):113–121
Cariani PA (2001) Specialist and generalist strategies in sensory evolution. Artif Life 7(2):211–214
Clemens J, Wohlgemuth S, Ronacher B (2012) Nonlinear computations underlying temporal and population sparseness in the auditory system of the grasshopper. J Neurosci 32(29):10053–10062
Doherty JA (1985) Temperature coupling and ’trade-off’ phenomena in the acoustic communication system of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer (Gryllidae). J Exp Biol 114(1):17–35
Eggermont JJ, Wang X (2011) Temporal coding in auditory cortex. In: Winer JA, Schreiner CE (eds) The Auditory Cortex. Springer, New York, pp 309–328
Eilts-Grimm K, Wiese K (1984) An electrical analogue model for frequency dependent lateral inhibition refering to the omega neurons in the auditory pathway of the cricket. Biol Cybern 51:45–52
Engel TA, Schimansky-Geier L, Herz AVM, Schreiber S, Erchova I (2008) Subthreshold membrane-potential resonances shape spike-train patterns in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol 100(3):1576–1589
Erchova I, Kreck G, Heinemann U, Herz AVM (2004) Dynamics of rat entorhinal cortex layer II and III cells: characteristics of membrane potential resonance at rest predict oscillation properties near threshold. J Physiol 560(Pt 1):89–110
Farris H, Mason A, Hoy RR (2004) Identified auditory neurons in the cricket Gryllus rubens: temporal processing in calling song sensitive units. Hear Res 193(1–2):121–133
Faulkes Z, Pollack GS (2000) Effects of inhibitory timing on contrast enhancement in auditory circuits in crickets Teleogryllus oceanicus. J Neurophysiol 84(3):1247–1255
Fettiplace R (1987) Electrical tuning of hair cells in the inner ear. Trends Neurosci 10(10):421–425
Fullard JH, Ratcliffe JM, Guignion C (2005) Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats. J Comp Physiol A 191(7):605–618
Gade S, Herlufsen H (1987) Use of weighting functions in DFT/FFT analysis (Part I). Brüel Kjær Technical Rev 3:1–28
Gerstein GL, Kiang NY (1960) An approach to the quantitative analysis of electrophysiological data from single neurons. Biophys J 1:15–28
Gimbarzevsky B, Miura RM, Puil E (1984) Impedance profiles of peripheral and central neurons. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 62(4):460–462
Goertzel G (1958) An algorithm for the evaluation of finite trigonometric series. Am Math Mon 65(1):34–35
Hennig RM (1988) Ascending auditory interneurons in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker): comparative physiology and direct connections with afferents. J Comp Physiol A 163(1):135–143
Hennig RM (2003) Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? J Comp Physiol A 189(8):589–598
Hennig RM (2009) Walking in Fourier’s space: algorithms for the computation of periodicities in song patterns by the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 195(10):971–987
Hennig RM, Franz A, Stumpner A (2004) Processing of auditory information in insects. Microsc Res Tech 63(6):351–374
Hildebrandt KJ (2014) Neural maps in insect versus vertebrate auditory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 24(1):82–87
Horseman G, Huber F (1994) Sound localisation in crickets. I. Contralateral inhibition of an ascending auditory interneurone. J Comp Physiol A 175(4):389–398
Hoy RR (1978) Acoustic communication in crickets: a model system for the study of feature detection. Fed Proc 37(10):2316–2323
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J Physiol 160:106–154
Hutcheon B, Yarom Y (2000) Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons. Trends Neurosci 23(5):216–222
Hutcheon B, Miura RM, Puil E (1996) Models of subthreshold membrane resonance in neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 76(2):698–714
Imaizumi K, Pollack GS (2001) Neural representation of sound amplitude by functionally different auditory receptors in crickets. J Acoust Soc Am 109(3):1247–1260
Izhikevich EM (2001) Resonate-and-fire neurons. Neural Netw 14(6–7):883–894
Jones JP, Palmer LA (1987) An evaluation of the two-dimensional gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58(6):1233–1258
Koch C (1984) Cable theory in neurons with active, linearized membranes. Biol Cybern 50(1):15–33
Kostarakos K, Hedwig B (2012) Calling song recognition in female crickets: temporal tuning of identified brain neurons matches behavior. J Neurosci 32(28):9601–9612
Kostarakos K, Hedwig B (2015) Pattern recognition in field crickets: concepts and neural evidence. J Comp Physiol A 201(1):73–85
Libersat F, Murray J, Hoy RR (1994) Frequency as a releaser in the courtship song of two crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer) and Teleogryllus oceanicus: a neuroethological analysis. J Comp Physiol A 174:485–494
Machens CK, Stemmler MB, Prinz P, Krahe R, Ronacher B, Herz AV (2001) Representation of acoustic communication signals by insect auditory receptor neurons. J Neurosci 21(9):3215–3227
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2004) Differential temporal coding of rhythmically diverse acoustic signals by a single interneuron. J Neurophysiol 92(2):939–948
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2005) Effect of the temporal pattern of contralateral inhibition on sound localization cues. J Neurosci 25(26):6137–6144
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2006) A behavioral role for feature detection by sensory bursts. J Neurosci 26(41):10542–10547
Nabatiyan A, Poulet JFA, de Polavieja GG, Hedwig B (2003) Temporal pattern recognition based on instantaneous spike rate coding in a simple auditory system. J Neurophysiol 90(4):2484–2493
Nolen TG, Hoy RR (1984) Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioral context. Science 226(4677):992–994
Nolen TG, Hoy RR (1986) Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors. J Comp Physiol A 159(4):423–439
Pollack GS, Kim JS (2013) Selective phonotaxis to high sound-pulse rate in the cricket Gryllus assimilis. J Comp Physiol A 199(4):285–293
Popov AV, Shuvalov VF, Markovich A (1976) The spectrum of the calling signals, phonotaxis, and the auditory system in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Neurosci Behav Physiol 7:56–62
Quiroga RQ, Nadasdy Z, Ben-Shaul Y (2004) Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput 16(8):1661–1687
Reiss RF (1962) A theory and simulation of rhythmic behavior due to reciprocal inhibition in small nerve nets. AIEE-IRE ’62 (Spring): Proceedings of the May 1–3, 1962, spring joint computer conference. ACM, New York, pp 171–194
Rheinlaender J, Kalmring K, Popov AV, Rehbein H (1976) Brain projections and information processing of biologically significant sounds by two large ventral-cord neurons of Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol A 110(3):251–269
Richardson MJE, Brunel N, Hakim V (2003) From subthreshold to firing-rate resonance. J Neurophysiol 89(5):2538–2554
Roeder KD (1962) The behaviour of free flying moths in the presence of artificial ultrasonic pulses. Anim Behav 10(3–4):300–304
Rose D, Blakemore C (1974) Effects of bicuculline on functions of inhibition in visual cortex. Nature 249(455):375–377
Rössert C, Moore LE, Straka H, Glasauer S (2011) Cellular and network contributions to vestibular signal processing: impact of ion conductances, synaptic inhibition, and noise. J Neurosci 31(23):8359–8372
Sabourin P, Pollack GS (2010) Temporal coding by populations of auditory receptor neurons. J Neurophysiol 103(3):1614–1621
Sabourin P, Gottlieb H, Pollack GS (2008) Carrier-dependent temporal processing in an auditory interneuron. J Acoust Soc Am 123(5):2910–2917
Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155(2):171–185
Schildberger K, Hörner M (1988) The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis: I. Influence of hyperpolarization of identified neurons on sound localization. J Comp Physiol A 163(5):621–631
Schnitzler HU, Kalko EKV (2001) Echolocation by insect-eating bats. Bioscience 51(7):557–569
Schreiber S, Erchova I, Heinemann U, Herz AVM (2004) Subthreshold resonance explains the frequency-dependent integration of periodic as well as random stimuli in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol 92(1):408–415
Schreiber S, Samengo I, Herz AVM (2009) Two distinct mechanisms shape the reliability of neural responses. J Neurophysiol 101(5):2239–2251
Schreiner CE, Langner G (1988) Coding of temporal patterns in the central auditory nervous system. In: Gerald M, Edelman WMC, Einar Gall W (eds) Auditory function: neurobiological bases of hearing. Wiley, New York, pp 337–361
Schwartz O, Pillow JW, Rust NC, Simoncelli EP (2006) Spike-triggered neural characterization. J Vis 6(4):484–507
Selverston AI, Kleindienst HU, Huber F (1985) Synaptic connectivity between cricket auditory interneurons as studied by selective photoinactivation. J Neurosci 5(5):1283–1292
Sharafi N, Benda J, Lindner B (2013) Information filtering by synchronous spikes in a neural population. J Comput Neurosci 34(2):285–301
Smith EC, Lewicki MS (2006) Efficient auditory coding. Nature 439(7079):978–982
Sysel P, Rajmic P (2012) Goertzel algorithm generalized to non-integer multiples of fundamental frequency. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2012(1):1–8
Todd BS, Andrews DC (1999) The identification of peaks in physiological signals. Comput Biomed Res 32(4):322–335
Treves A (1993) Mean-field analysis of neuronal spike dynamics. Network 4(3):259–284
Triblehorn JD, Ghose K, Bohn K, Moss CF, Yager DD (2008) Free-flight encounters between praying mantids (Parasphendale agrionina) and bats (Eptesicus fuscus). J Exp Biol 211(4):555–562
Tunstall DN, Pollack GS (2005) Temporal and directional processing by an identified interneuron, ON1, compared in cricket species that sing with different tempos. J Comp Physiol A 191(4):363–372
Urdapilleta E, Samengo I (2015) Effects of spike-triggered negative feedback on receptive-field properties. J Comput Neurosci 38(2):405–425
van Hateren JH, Laughlin SB (1990) Membrane parameters, signal transmission, and the design of a graded potential neuron. J Comp Physiol A 166(4):437–448
Webb B, Wessnitzer J, Bush S, Schul J, Buchli J, Ijspeert A (2007) Resonant neurons and bushcricket behaviour. J Comp Physiol A 193(2):285–288
Weber T, Thorson J (1989) Phonotactic behavior of walking crickets. In: Huber F, Moore TE, Loher W (eds) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell UP, Ithaca, pp 310–339
Wiese K, Eilts K (1985) Evidence for matched frequency dependence of bilateral inhibition in the auditory pathway of Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Jahrb Abt allg Zool Physiol Tiere 89(2):181–201
Wohlers DW, Huber F (1978) Intracellular recording and staining of cricket auditory interneurons (Gryllus campestris L., Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer). J Comp Physiol A 127(1):11–28
Wohlers DW, Huber F (1982) Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus campestris L. J Comp Physiol A 146(2):161–173
Wyttenbach RA, May ML, Hoy RR (1996) Categorical perception of sound frequency by crickets. Science 273(5281):1542–1544
Yager DD (2012) Predator detection and evasion by flying insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22(2):201–207
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by grants from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (01GQ1001A, 01GQ0901, 01GQ0972, 01GQ1403) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB618, GRK1589/1). We are grateful to Wei Wu for valuable discussion. We thank Manuel Gersbacher, Michael Reichert, Frederic Römschied, Jan-Hendrik Schleimer and Vanessa Stempel for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of Germany and the Principles of animal care, publication No. 86–23, revised 1985 of the National Institute of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rau, F., Clemens, J., Naumov, V. et al. Firing-rate resonances in the peripheral auditory system of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus . J Comp Physiol A 201, 1075–1090 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-015-1036-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-015-1036-1