Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 197, Issue 6, pp 677–682 | Cite as

No alignment of cattle along geomagnetic field lines found

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the body orientation of domestic cattle on free pastures in several European states, based on the Google satellite photographs. In sum, 232 herds with 3,412 individuals were evaluated. Two independent groups participated in our study and came to the same conclusion that in contradiction to the recent findings of other researchers, no alignment of the animals and of their herds along geomagnetic field lines could be found. Several possible reasons for this discrepancy should be taken into consideration: poor quality of Google satellite photographs, difficulties in determining the body axis, selection of herds or animals within herds, lack of blinding in the evaluation, possible subconscious bias, and, most importantly, high sensitivity of the calculated main directions of the Rayleigh vectors to some kind of bias or to some overlooked or ignored confounder. This factor could easily have led to an unsubstantiated positive conclusion about the existence of magnetoreception.

Keywords

Magnetoreception Magnetic alignment Cattle in magnetic field Magnetic sense Statistical evaluation 

Supplementary material

359_2011_628_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (503 kb)
Supplementary material (504 kb)

References

  1. Begall S, Cerveny J, Neef J, Vojtech O, Burda H (2008) Magnetic alignment in grazing and resting cattle and deer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13451–13455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burda H, Begall S, Cerveny J, Neef J, Nemec P (2009) Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic alignment of ruminants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:5708–5713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dennis TE, Rayner MJ, Walker MM (2007) Evidence that pigeons orient to geomagnetic intensity during homing. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1153–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnsen S, Lohmann KJ (2005) The physics and neurobiology of magnetoreception. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:703–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalmijn AJ (1978) Animal migration, navigation, and homing. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirschvink JL, Walker MM, Diebel CE (2001) Magnetite-based magnetoreception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:462–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mardia KV, Jupp PE (2000) Directional statistics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  8. Ritz T, Adem S, Schulten K (2000) A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds. Biophys J 78:707–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schuz J, Ahlbom A (2008) Exposure to electromagnetic fields and the risk of childhood leukemia: a review. Radiat Prot Dosim 132:202–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (1995) Magnetic Orientation in Animals. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Faculty of MedicineCharles UniversityPlzenCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Electromagnetic Field, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringCzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.National Reference Laboratory for Electromagnetic FieldNational Institute of Public HealthPragueCzech Republic
  4. 4.Department of System Analysis, Faculty of Informatics and StatisticsUniversity of EconomicsPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations