Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course?
The Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti often follows stereotypical routes through a cluttered landscape containing both distant panoramic views and obstacles (plants) to navigate around. We created an artificial obstacle course for the ants between a feeder and their nest. Landmarks comprised natural objects in the landscape such as logs, branches, and tussocks. Many ants travelled stereotypical routes home through the obstacle course in training, threading repeatedly the same gaps in the landmarks. Manipulations altering the relations between the landmarks and the surrounding panorama, however, affected the routes in two major ways. Both interchanging the positions of landmarks (transpositions) and displacing the entire landmark set along with the starting position of the ants (translations) (1) reduced the stereotypicality of the route, and (2) increased turns and meanders during travel. The ants might have used the entire panorama in view-based travel, or the distal panorama might prime the identification and use of landmarks en route. Despite the large data set, both options (not mutually exclusive) remain viable.
KeywordsLandmark Route Navigation Panorama Desert ant
- Calhoun JB (1963) The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
- Cheng K (2006) Arthropod navigation: ants, bees, crabs, spiders finding their way. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 189–209Google Scholar
- Christian KA, Morton SR (1992) Extreme thermophilia in a Central Australian ant, Melophorus bagoti. Physiol Zool 65:885–905Google Scholar
- Collett TS, Fry S, Wehner R (1993) Sequence learning by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 172:693–706Google Scholar
- Collett TS, Fauria K, Dale K (2003) Contextual cues and insect navigation. In: Jeffery KJ (ed) The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 67–82Google Scholar
- Rosengren R (1971) Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behaviour in foraging wood ants of the genus Formica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Zool Fenn 133:1–105Google Scholar
- Schultheiss P, Schwarz S, Wystrach A (2010) Nest relocation and colony founding in the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti Lubbock (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche. doi:10.1155/2010/435838
- Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution, and behavior, second edition. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar