Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 197, Issue 1, pp 119–129 | Cite as

Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes

Original Paper

Abstract

In arboreal habitats gaps between branches and branch structure profoundly affect the ability of animals to move; hence, an ability to perceive such attributes could facilitate choosing routes that enhance the speed and ease of locomotion. Although many snakes are arboreal, no previous study has determined whether they can perceive structural variation of branches that is mechanically relevant to their locomotion. We tested whether the gap distance, location, and attributes of two destination perches on the far side of a crossable gap affected the route travelled by North American rat snakes (Pantherophis), which are proficient climbers. Snakes usually chose routes with shorter gaps. Within a horizontal plane, the snakes usually went straight rather than crossing an equal distance gap with a 90° turn, which was consistent with our finding that crossing a straight gap was easier. However, decreasing the distance of the gap with a 90° turn eliminated the preference for going straight. Additional factors, such as the width of the landing surface and the complexity of branching of the destination perches, resulted in non-random route choice. Thus, many of the observed biases in route choice suggested abilities to perceive structural variation and select routes that are mechanically beneficial.

Keywords

Locomotion Vision Arboreal Habitat structure Affordance 

References

  1. Astley HC, Jayne BC (2007) Effects of perch diameter and incline on the kinematics, performance and modes of arboreal locomotion of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata). J Exp Biol 210:3862–3872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Astley HC, Jayne BC (2009) Arboreal habitat structure affects the performance and modes of locomotion of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata). J Exp Zool Part A 311A:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnum SA, Manville CJ, Tester JR, Carmen WJ (1992) Path selection by Peromyscus leucopus in the presence and absence of vegetative cover. J Mammal 73:797–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brattstrom BH (1965) Body temperatures of reptiles. Am Midl Nat 73:376–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caprette CL (2005) Conquering the cold shudder: the origin and evolution of snake eyes. Dissertation, The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Carello C, Wagman JB (2009) Mutuality in the perception of affordances and the control of movement. In: Sternad D (ed) Progress in motor control. Springer, New York, pp 273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collett TS, Harkness L (1982) Depth vision in animals. In: Goodale MA, Ingle DJ, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 111–176Google Scholar
  8. Conant R, Collins JT (1991) A field guide to reptiles and amphibians of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Ewert JP (1982) Neuronal basis of configurational prey selection in the common toad. In: Goodale MA, Ingle DJ, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 7–45Google Scholar
  10. Fajen BR (2009) Introduction to section on perception and action-themes in perception and action. In: Sternad D (ed) Progress in motor control. Springer, New York, pp 263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol Gen 47:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Inc., HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  13. Henderson RW, Lillywhite HB (1993) Behavioral and functional ecology of arboreal snakes. In: Collins JT, Seigel RA (eds) Snakes—ecology and behavior. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, pp 1–48Google Scholar
  14. Jayne BC, Riley MA (2007) Scaling of the axial morphology and gap-bridging ability of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis. J Exp Biol 210:1148–1160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kording K (2007) Decision theory: what “should” the nervous system do? Science 318:606–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lock A, Collett TS (1979) A toad’s devious approach to its prey: a study of some complex uses of depth vision. J Comp Physiol A 131:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Losos JB (1990) Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecol Monogr 60:369–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Losos JB, Irschick DJ (1996) The effect of perch diameter on escape behaviour of Anolis lizards: laboratory predictions and field tests. Anim Behav 51:593–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Losos JB, Sinervo B (1989) The effects of morphology and perch diameter on sprint performance of Anolis lizards. J Exp Biol 145:23–30Google Scholar
  20. Mattingly WB, Jayne BC (2004) Resource use in arboreal habitats: structure affects locomotion of four ecomorphs of Anolis lizards. Ecology 85:1111–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mattingly WB, Jayne BC (2005) The choice of arboreal escape paths and its consequences for the locomotor behaviour of four species of Anolis lizards. Anim Behav 70:1239–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McVea DA, Pearson KG (2009) Object avoidance during locomotion. In: Sternad D (ed) Progress in motor control. Springer, New York, pp 293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mullin SJ, Cooper RJ (2002) Barking up the wrong tree: climbing performance of rat snakes and its implications for depredation of avian nests. Can J Zool 80:591–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murata A (1999) Extending effective target width in Fitts’ law to a two-dimensional pointing task. Int J Hum Comput Int 11:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ott M (2006) Visual accommodation in vertebrates: mechanisms, physiological response and stimuli. J Comp Physiol A 192:97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pizzatto L, Almeida-Santos SM, Shine R (2007) Life-history adaptations to arboreality in snakes. Ecology 88:359–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pyron RA, Burbrink FT (2009) Neogene diversification and taxonomic stability in the snake tribe Lampropeltini (Serpentes: Colubridae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 52:524–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1994) Perceptual and motivational aspects of detour behavior in young chicks. Anim Behav 47:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shine R, Sun LX, Kearney M, FitzGerald M (2002) Thermal correlates of foraging-site selection by Chinese pit-vipers (Gloydius shedaoensis, Viperidae). J Therm Biol 27:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sivak JG (1977) The role of the spectacle in the visual optics of the snake eye. Vision Res 17:293–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Strasser E, Fleagle J, Rosenberger A, McHenry H (1998) Primate locomotion: recent advances. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Tarsitano MS, Andrew R (1999) Scanning and route selection in the jumping spider Portia labiata. Anim Behav 58:255–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Walls GL (1942) The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Hafner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright AH, Wright AA (1957) Handbook of Snakes. Comstock Publishing Associates, IthacaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations