Skip to main content
Log in

Vision as a third sensory modality to elicit attack behavior in a nocturnal spider

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae) has been extensively studied for many years and is probably the only spider that presently can be considered a model organism for neuro-ethology. The night-active spiders have been shown to predominantly rely on their excellent mechano-sensory systems for courtship and prey capture, whereas vision was assumed to play a minor role, if any, in these behavioral contexts. Using slowly moving discs presented on a computer screen it could be shown for the first time that visual stimuli alone can elicit attack behavior (abrupt approaching reactions) in these spiders as well. These observations suggest that visual information could be used by the spiders to elicit and guide predatory behavior. Attack behavior in Cupiennius salei can thus be triggered independently by three sensory modalities—substrate vibrations, airflow stimuli, and visual cues—and offers an interesting model system to study the interactions of multimodal sensory channels in complex behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Barth FG (1993) Sensory guidance in spider pre-copulatory behavior. Comp Biochem Physiol, A 104:717–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Seyfarth E-A (1979) Cupiennius salei Keys. (Araneae) in the highlands of central Guatemala. J Arachnol 7:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Bleckmann H, Bohnenberger J, Seyfarth E-A (1988) Spiders of the genus Cupiennius Simon 1891 (Araneae, Ctenidae) II. On the vibratory environment of a wandering spider. Oecologia 77:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Nakagawa T, Eguchi E (1993) Vision in the ctenid spider Cupiennius salei: spectral range and absolute sensitivity. J Exp Biol 181:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Humphrey JAC, Wastl U, Halbritter J, Brittinger W (1995) Dynamics of arthropod filiform hairs. III. Flow patterns related to air movement detection in a spider (Cupiennius salei Keys.). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 347:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coddington J, Sobrevila C (1987) Web manipulation and two stereotyped attack behaviors in the ogre-faced spider Deinopis spinosus Marx (Araneae, Deinopidae). J Arachnol 15:213–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenk LM, Schmid A (2010) The orientation-dependent visual spatial cut-off frequency in a spider. J Exp Biol 213:3111–3117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forster LM (1979) Visual mechanisms of hunting behavior in Trite planiceps, a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). N Z J Zool 6:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster LM (1982) Non-visual prey-capture in Trite planiceps, a jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae). J Arachnol 10:179–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergenröder R, Barth FG (1983) The release of attack and escape behavior by vibratory stimuli in a wandering spider (Cupiennius salei Keys.). J Comp Physiol A 152:347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homann H (1928) Beiträge zur Physiologie der Spinnenaugen. Z vergl Physiol 7:201–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Nelson XJ, Sune GO (2005) A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15155–15160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Land MF, Barth FG (1992) The quality of vision in the ctenid spider Cupiennius salei. J Exp Biol 164:227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH (1959) What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proc Inst Radio Engr 47:1940–1951

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizotte RS, Rovner JS (1988) Nocturnal capture of fireflies by lycosid spiders: visual versus vibratory stimuli. Anim Behav 36:1809–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers M (1963) Zur Biologie und zum Verhalten von Cupiennius salei (Keyserling), einer amerikanischen Ctenide. Zool Jb Syst 91:1–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata K, Zschokke S (2010) Upside-down spiders build upside-down orb webs: web asymmetry, spider orientation and running speed in Cyclosa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0729

  • Neuhofer D, Machan R, Schmid A (2009) Visual perception of motion in a hunting spider. J Exp Biol 212:2819–2823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Uetz GW (1996a) The influence of sensory information on patch residence time in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 51:1285–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Uetz GW (1996b) Wolf spiders vary patch residence time in the presence of chemical cues from prey (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol 24:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons M, Uetz G (1997) The effect of prey movement on attack behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). J Insect Behav 10:737–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid A (1997) A visually induced switch in mode of locomotion of a spider. Z Naturforsch C 52c:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid A (1998) Different functions of different eye types in the spider Cupiennius salei. J Exp Biol 201:221–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt A, Schuster M, Barth FG (1990) Daily locomotor activity patterns in three species of Cupiennius (Araneae, Ctenidae): the males are the wandering spiders. J Arachnol 18:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausfeld NJ, Barth FG (1993) Two visual systems in one brain: neuropils serving the secondary eyes of the spider Cupiennius salei. J Comp Neurol 328:43–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strausfeld NJ, Weltzien P, Barth FG (1993) Two visual systems in one brain: neuropils serving the principal eyes of the spider Cupiennius salei. J Comp Neurol 328:63–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PW, Jackson RR, Robertson MW (1998) A case of blind spider’s buff? Prey-capture by jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) in the absence of visual cues. J Arachnol 26:369–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann K (1993) Visual brightness discrimination of the jumping spider Menemerus bivittatus (Araneae, Salticidae). J Arachnol 21:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Roberts JA (2002) Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: Insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav Evol 59:222–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J (2000) Depth cues, behavioural context, and natural illumination: some potential limitations of video playback techniques. Acta Ethol 3:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank FG Barth for stimulating discussions. LM Fenk is recipient of a DOC-fFORTE-fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences at the Department of Neurobiology, University of Vienna. Care and use of the animals comply with the Austrian animal welfare laws, guidelines and policies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. M. Fenk.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 12024 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenk, L.M., Hoinkes, T. & Schmid, A. Vision as a third sensory modality to elicit attack behavior in a nocturnal spider. J Comp Physiol A 196, 957–961 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0575-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0575-8

Keywords

Navigation