Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 194, Issue 10, pp 915–919 | Cite as

Effect of conductivity changes on the stability of electric signal waveforms in dwarf stonebashers (Mormyridae; Pollimyrus castelnaui, P. marianne)

Short Communication


The dwarf stonebasher sibling species Pollimyrus castelnaui and P. marianne use differences in the electric organ discharges (EODs) for species recognition. As EOD waveforms are affected by water conductivity changes, the reliability of species recognition might be impeded due to natural variability in the environment. EODs of P. castelnaui (N = 8) and P. marianne (N = 8) under high (250 μS/cm) and low (25 μS/cm) conductivity were recorded and compared. Local peaks of the EODs of both species were significantly and predictably modified due to the conductivity change but species-specific differences were always recognizable. The duration of the EODs was not influenced by the conductivity change. Temperature alterations modified the duration in a linear relationship, allowing the determination of Q10 values (1.6 for P. castelnaui’s and 1.7 for P. marianne’s EODs). As the species-specific differences are not masked by conductivity effects, EOD discrimination seems to be a reliable species recognition mechanism under natural circumstances.


Electric organ discharge Water conductivity Q10 value Species recognition Weakly electric fish 


  1. Arnegard ME, Jackson B, Hopkins CD (2006) Time-domain signal divergence and discrimination without receptor modification in sympatric morphs of electric fishes. J Exp Biol 209:2183–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baier B, Kramer B (2007) Electric communication during courtship and spawning in two sibling species of dwarf stonebasher from southern Africa, Pollimyrus castelnaui and P. marianne (Mormyridae, Teleostei): evidence for a non species-specific communication code? Behaviour 144:115–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell CC, Bradbury J, Russell CJ (1976) The electric organ of a Mormyrid as a current and voltage source. J Comp Physiol A 110:65–88Google Scholar
  4. Bossche J-P, Bernacsek GM (1991) Source book for the inland fishery resources of Africa, vol 1. CIFA Technical Paper No. 18.1. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratton BO, Kramer B (1988) Intraspecific variability of the pulse-type discharges of the African electric fishes, Pollimyrus isidori and Petrocephalus bovei (Teleostei: Mormyridae), and their dependence on water conductivity. J Exp Biol 47:227–238Google Scholar
  6. Bullock TH, Hopkins CD, Popper AN, Fay RR (2005) Electroreception. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunlap KD, Smith GT, Yekta A (2000) Temperature dependence of electrocommunication signals and their underlying neural rhythms in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Brain Behav Evol 55:152–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139 (Suppl) 125–153Google Scholar
  9. Hopkins CD (1999) Design features for electric communication. J Exp Biol 202:1217–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hopkins CD, Bass AH (1981) Temporal coding of species recognition signals in an electric fish. Science 212:85–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirschbaum F (1975) Environmental factors control the periodical reproduction of tropical electric fish. Experientia 31:1159–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirschbaum F (1995) Reproduction and development in mormyriform and gymnotiform fishes. In: Moller P (ed) Electric fishes: history and behavior. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 267–301Google Scholar
  13. Koekemoer JH (2003) A fish ecological study of rivers and floodplains in the eastern Caprivi, Namibia, Rand Afrikaans University, Doctorial thesisGoogle Scholar
  14. Kramer B (1990) Electrocommunication in Teleost fishes: behavior and experiments. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Kramer B, van der Bank H, Flint N, Sauer-Gürth H, Wink M (2003) Evidence for parapatric speciation in the Mormyrid fish, Pollimyrus castelnaui (Boulenger, 1911), from the Okavango–Upper Zambezi River Systems: P. marianne sp. nov., defined by electric organ discharges, morphology and genetics. Environ Biol Fishes 77:47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kramer B, Westby GWM (1985) No sex difference in the waveform of the pulse type electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyridae). Experientia 41:1530–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kramer B, Kuhn B (1993) Electric signalling and impedance matching in a variable environment. Naturwissenschaften 80:43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Markowski B, Baier B, Kramer B (2008) Differentiation in electrical pulse waveforms in a pair of sibling dwarf stonebashers, Pollimyrus castelnaui and P. marianne: possible mechanisms and functions (Mormyridae, Teleostei). Behaviour 145:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moller P (1995) Electric fishes: history and behavior. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt-Nielsen K (1999) Physiologie der Tiere. Spektrum, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  21. Schugardt C (1997) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur exogenen Kontrolle der zyklischen Fortpflanzung afrikanischer Süßwasserfische: Vergleich von Mormyriden und Polypterus. Humboldt Universität, Berlin, Doctorial thesisGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolski P, Murray-Hudson M (2006) Flooding dynamics in a large low-gradient alluvial fan, the Okavango Delta, Botswana, from analysis and interpretation of a 30-year hydrometric record. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoological Institute of the University of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Institut Für ZoologieBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations