Abstract
Cochlear microphonics (CMs), which represent the electrical activity of hair cells, and compound action potentials (CAPs), which represent the activity of the auditory nerve, were recorded from the round window of the inner ear, in owlets aged between 5 and 97 days posthatching, i.e., from soon after hatching to beyond fledgling. At the earliest ages examined, animals showed very insensitive CM and virtually no CAP responses. Thus, hearing in barn owls develops entirely posthatching and the birds appear to be profoundly deaf well into the second week. Thresholds improved gradually after that and CMs reached their adult sensitivity at 5 weeks posthatching at all frequencies. Compound action potential responses appeared progressively later with increasing frequency. Adult neural sensitivity was achieved about 1 week later than for the CM responses at most frequencies, but took until 9–10 weeks posthatching at the highest frequencies (8–10 kHz). This indicates an apex-to-base maturation sequence of neural sensitivity within the cochlea, with a disproportionately long period to maturity for the most basal regions. Compound action potential amplitudes matured even later, at about 3 months posthatching, at all frequencies. This suggests a prolonged immaturity in the temporal synchrony of spiking in the auditory nerve.













Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Abbreviations
- CAP:
-
Compound action potential
- CM:
-
Cochlear microphonic
- FFT:
-
Fast fourier transform
- NM:
-
Nucleus magnocellularis
- NL:
-
Nucleus laminaris
- Pxx:
-
xx Days posthatching
- RMS:
-
Root mean square
References
Aleksandrov LI, Dmitrieva LP (1992) Development of auditory sensitivity of altricial birds. Absolute thresholds of the generation of evoked potentials. Neurosci Behav Physiol 22:132–137
Brittan-Powell EF, Dooling RJ (2004) Development of auditory sensitivity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Acoust Soc Am 115:3092–3102
Carr CE, Soares D, Parameshwaran S, Perney T (2001) Evolution and development of time coding systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:727–733
Cohen YE, Fernandez HN, Saunders JC (1992a) Middle-ear development: II. Morphometric changes in the conducting apparatus of the chick. J Morphol 212:257–267
Cohen YE, Rubin DM, Saunders JC (1992b) Middle ear development. I: extra-stapedius response in the neonatal chick. Hear Res 58:1–8
Coles RB, Guppy A (1988) Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba). J Comp Physiol A 163:117–133
Dallos P (1973) The auditory periphery: biophysics and physiology. Academic, New York
Fischer FP (1994) Quantitative TEM analysis of the barn owl basilar papilla. Hear Res 73:1–15
Gerstner W, Kempter R, van Hemmen JL, Wagner H (1996) A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature 383:76–78
Grothe B, Carr CE, Cassedy JH, Fritzsch B, Köppl C (2004) The evolution of central pathways and their neural processing patterns. In: Manley GA, Popper A, Fay RR (eds) Evolution of the vertebrate auditory system. Springer, New York, pp 289–359
Haresign T, Moiseff A (1988) Early growth and development of the common barn-owl’s facial ruff. Auk 105:699–705
Jones SM, Jones TA (1995) Neural tuning characteristics of auditory primary afferents in the chicken embryo. Hear Res 82:139–148
Jones TA, Jones SM, Paggett KC (2006) The emergence of hearing in the chicken embryo. J Neurophysiol 96:128–141
Kempter R, Leibold C, Wagner H, van Hemmen JL (2001) Formation of temporal-feature maps by axonal propagation of synaptic learning. PNAS 98:4166–4171
Kettner RE, Feng J-Z, Brugge JF (1985) Postnatal development of the phase-locked response to low frequency tones of auditory nerve fibers in the cat. J Neurosci 5:275–283
Konishi M (2000) Study of sound localization by owls and its relevance to humans. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 126:459–469
Konishi M (2003) Coding of auditory space. Ann Rev Neurosci 26:31–55
Köppl C (1997) Phase locking to high frequencies in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl, Tyto alba. J Neurosci 17:3312–3321
Köppl C, Gleich O (2007) Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl. J Comp Physiol A (in press)
Köppl C, Gleich O, Manley GA (1993) An auditory fovea in the barn owl cochlea. J Comp Physiol A 171:695–704
Köppl C, Futterer E, Nieder B, Sistermann R, Wagner H (2005) Embryonic and posthatching development of the barn owl (Tyto alba): reference data for age determination. Dev Dyn 233:1248–1260
Kubke MF, Carr CE (2000) Development of the auditory brainstem of birds: comparison between barn owls and chickens. Hear Res 147:1–20
Manley GA (1996) Ontogeny of frequency mapping in the peripheral auditory system of birds and mammals: a critical review. Auditory Neurosci 3:199–214
Manley GA, Kaiser A, Brix J, Gleich O (1991) Activity patterns of primary auditory-nerve fibres in chickens: development of fundamental properties. Hear Res 57:1–15
Moore DR (1981) Development of the cat peripheral auditory system: input–output functions of cochlear potentials. Brain Res 219:29–44
Rebillard G, Rubel EW (1981) Electrophysiological study of the maturation of auditory responses from the inner ear of the chick. Brain Res 229:15–23
Richter CP, Sauer G, Hoidis S, Klinke R (1996) Development of activity patterns in auditory nerve fibres of pigeons. Hear Res 95:77–86
Salvi RJ, Saunders SS, Powers NL, Boettcher FA (1992) Discharge patterns of cochlear ganglion neurons in the chicken. J Comp Physiol A 170:227–241
Saunders JC, Coles RB, Gates GR (1973) The development of auditory evoked responses in the cochlea and cochlear nuclei of the chick. Brain Res 63:59–74
Saunders JC, Relkin EM, Rosowski JJ, Bahl C (1986) Changes in middle-ear input admittance during postnatal auditory development in chicks. Hear Res 24:227–235
Shawyer C (1998) The barn owl. Arelquin, Chelmsford
Sullivan WE, Konishi M (1984) Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J Neurosci 4:1787–1799
Walsh EJ, McGee J, Javel E (1986a) Development of auditory-evoked potenitals in the cat. II.Wave latencies. J Acoust Soc Am 79:725–744
Walsh EJ, McGee J, Javel E (1986b) Development of auditory-evoked potenitals in the cat. III.Wave amplitudes. J Acoust Soc Am 79:745–754
Walsh EJ, McGee J, Javel E (1986c) Development of auditory evoked potentials in the cat. I. Onset of response and development of sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 79:712–724
Woolf NK, Ryan AF (1988) Contributions of the middle ear to the development of function in the cochlea. Hear Res 35:131–142
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Hermann Wagner for his generous gifts of several young owls used in this study. Geoff Manley kindly commented on an earlier version of the manuscript. Experiments complied with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals “, publication No. 86–23, revised 1985 of the National Institutes of Health. Animal husbandry and experimental protocols were approved by the Regierung von Oberbayern (AZ 211–2531–28/98).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Köppl, C., Nickel, R. Prolonged maturation of cochlear function in the barn owl after hatching. J Comp Physiol A 193, 613–624 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-007-0216-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-007-0216-z


