Advertisement

Synchrony during acoustic interactions in the bushcricket Mecopoda ‘Chirper’ (Tettigoniidae:Orthoptera) is generated by a combination of chirp-by-chirp resetting and change in intrinsic chirp rate

  • Vivek Nityananda
  • Rohini BalakrishnanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In several bushcricket species, individual males synchronise their chirps during acoustic interactions. Synchrony is imperfect with the chirps of one male leading or lagging the other by a few milliseconds. Imperfect synchrony is believed to have evolved in response to female preferences for leading chirps. We investigated the mechanism underlying synchrony in the bushcricket species Mecopoda ‘Chirper’ from Southern India using playback experiments and simulations of pairwise interactions. We also investigated whether intrinsic chirp period is a good predictor of leading probability during interactions between males. The mechanism underlying synchrony in this species differs from previously reported mechanisms in that it involves both a change in the oscillator’s intrinsic rate and resetting on a chirp-by-chirp basis. The form of the phase response curve differs from those of previously reported firefly and bushcricket species including the closely related Malaysian species Mecopoda elongata. Simulations exploring oscillator properties showed that the outcome of pairwise interactions was independent of initial phase and alternation was not possible. Solo intrinsic chirp period was a relatively good predictor of leading probability. However, changing the intrinsic period during interactions could enable males with longer periods to lead during acoustic interactions.

Keywords

Mecopoda Synchrony Phase response curve Song oscillator Bushcricket 

Abbreviations

PRC

Phase response curve

SPL

Sound pressure level

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India for funding this project. We thank Sumit Dhole for help with some of the recordings. We also thank Heiner Römer and Manfred Hartbauer for interesting discussions. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. The experiments comply with the legal principles of animal care and animal welfare of the Government of India.

References

  1. Alexander RD (1967) Acoustical communication in Arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 12:495–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley DR (1969) Intracellular activity in cricket neurons during generation of song patterns. Z vergl Physiol 62:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck J (1988) Synchronous flashing of fireflies. II. Q Rev Biol 13:301–304Google Scholar
  5. Buck J, Buck E, Case F, Hanson FE (1981) Control of flashing in fireflies. V. Pacemaker synchronisation in Pteroptyx cribellata. J Comp Physiol A 144:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ermentrout B (1991) An adaptive model for synchrony in the firefly Pteroptyx malaccae. J Math Biol 29:571–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forrest TG, Ariaratnam J, Strogatz SH (1998) Synchrony in cricket calling songs: models of coupled biological oscillators. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 135th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Seattle, USA, pp 689–690Google Scholar
  8. Frank H, Altheon SC (1994) Testing hypotheses about population means. In: Statistics concepts and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 380–452Google Scholar
  9. Greenfield MD (1994) Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of signal interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:97–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenfield MD, Roizen I (1993) Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice. Nature 364:618–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenfield MD, Tourtellot MK, Snedden WA (1997) Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing. Proc R Soc B 264:1355–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson FE (1978) Comparative study of firefly pacemakers. Fed Proc 37:2158–2164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartbauer M, Krautzer S, Steiner K, Römer H (2005) Mechanisms for synchrony and alternation in song interactions of the bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol A 191:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones MDR (1974) The effect of acoustic signals on the chirp rhythm in the bushcricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. J Exp Biol 61:345–355Google Scholar
  15. Minckley RL, Greenfield MD, Tourtellot MK (1995) Chorus structure in tarbush grasshoppers: inhibition, selective phonoresponse and signal competition. Anim Behav 50:579–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mirollo RE, Strogatz SH (1990) Synchronization of pulse-coupled biological oscillators. SIAM J Appl Math 50:1645–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nityananda V, Balakrishnan R (2006) A diversity of songs among morphologically indistinguishable katydids of the genus Mecopoda (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Southern India. Bioacoustics 15:223–250Google Scholar
  18. Römer H, Hedwig B, Ott SR (1997) Proximate mechanism of female preference for the leader male in synchronising bushcrickets (Mecopoda elongata). In: Elsner N, Wässle H (eds) Proceedings of the 25th Göttingen neurobiology conference, Thieme, Stuttgart, 322 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Sismondo E (1990) Synchronous, alternating and phase-locked stridulation by a tropical katydid. Science 249:55–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snedden WA, Greenfield MD (1998) Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses. Anim Behav 56:1091–1098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strogatz SH, Stewart I (1993) Coupled oscillators and biological synchronization. Sci Am 269:102–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walker TJ (1969) Acoustic synchrony: two mechanisms in the snowy tree cricket. Science 166:891–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. West-Eberhard MJ (1984) Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. In: Lewis T (ed) Insect communication. Academic, London, pp 283–324Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecological SciencesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations