Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 192, Issue 4, pp 365–372 | Cite as

The night-time temporal window of locomotor activity in the Namib Desert long-distance wandering spider, Leucorchestris arenicola

  • Thomas NørgaardEmail author
  • Joh R. Henschel
  • Rüdiger Wehner
Original Paper


Even though being active exclusively after sunset, the male Leucorchestris arenicola spiders are able to return to their point of departure by following bee-line routes of up to several hundreds of meters in length. While performing this kind of long-distance path integration they must rely on external cues to adjust for navigational errors. Many external cues which could be used by the spiders change dramatically or disappear altogether in the transition period from day to night. Hence, it is therefore imperative to know exactly when after sunset the spiders navigate in order to find out how they do it. To explore this question, we monitored their locomotor activity with data loggers equipped with infrared beam sensors. Our results show that the male spiders are most active in the period between the end and the beginning of the astronomical twilight period. Moreover, they prefer the moonless, i.e. darkest times at night. Hence, we conclude that the males are truly—and extremely—nocturnal. We further show that they are able to navigate under the very dim light conditions prevailing on moonless nights, and thus do not have to rely on the moon or on moon-related patterns of polarised light as potential compass cues.


Navigation Homing Path integration Arachnidae Locomotor activity 



Long-distance excursion


Medium-distance excursion


Short-distance excursion



We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for funding the project (Grant No. 31-61844.00 to RW), the Department of Zoology, University of Zürich, Switzerland, and the Department of Zoology, University of Aarhus, Denmark, for equipment. Permission to work in the Namib-Naukluft Park was granted by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism and the Gobabeb Training and Research Centre. This fieldwork complies with the “Principles of animal care,” publication no. 86-23, revised 1985 of the National Institute of Health and with Namibian law.


  1. Åkesson S, Wehner R (1997) Visual snapshot memory of desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proc Neurobiol Conf Göttingen 25:482Google Scholar
  2. Bartels M (1929) Sinnesphysiologische und physiologische untersuchungen an der trichterspinne Agelena labyrinthica (Cl.). Z Vergl Physiol 10:527–591Google Scholar
  3. Barth FG (2001) A spiders world, senses and behavior. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Benhamou S, Sauvé JP, Bovet P (1990) Spatial memory in large scale movements: efficiency and limitations of the egocentric coding process. J Theor Biol 145:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees. Experiments and models. J Comp Physiol 151:521–543Google Scholar
  6. Cloudsley-Thompson JL (1985) The biorythms of spiders. In: Nentwig W (ed) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 371–379Google Scholar
  7. Dacke M, Nilsson D-E, Warrant EJ, Blest AD, Land MF, O’Carroll DC (1999) Built-in polarizers form part of a compass organ in spiders. Nature 401:470–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dacke M, Nordström P, Sholtz CH (2003) Twilight orientation to polarised light in the crepuscular dung beetle Scarabaeus zambesianus. J Exp Biol 206:1535–1543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doujak FP (1985) Can a shore crap see a star? J Exp Biol 116:385–393Google Scholar
  10. Gal J, Horvath G, Barta A, Wehner R (2001) Polarization of the moonlit clear night sky measured by full-sky imaging polarimetry at full moon: comparison of the polarization of moonlit and sunlit skies. J Geophys Res 106(D19):22647–22653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henschel JR (1990) The biology of Leucorchestris arenicola (Areneae: Heteropodidae), a burrowing spider of the Namib desert. In: Seely MK (ed) Namib ecology: 25 years of Namib research. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 7. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 115–127Google Scholar
  12. Henschel JR (2002) Long distance wandering and mating by the dancing white lady spider (Leucorchestris arenicola) (Araneae, Sparassidae) across Namib dunes. J Arachnol 30:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill DE (1979) Orientation by jumping spiders of the genus Phidippus (Arenae: Salticidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:301–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jäger P (1999) Sparassidae—the valid scientific name for the huntsman spiders (Arachnida: Areneae). Arachnol Mitt 17:1–10Google Scholar
  15. Kohler M, Wehner R (2005) Idiosyncratic route-based memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: how do they interact with path-integration vectors? Neurobiol Learn Mem 83:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawrence RF (1962) Spiders of the Namib desert. Ann Transvaal Mus 10:197–211Google Scholar
  17. Lawrence RF (1965) New and little known arachnida from the Namib Desert, South West Africa. Scientific papers of the Namib Desert research station, vol. 27, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  18. Lythgoe JN (1979) The ecology of vision. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Mittelstaedt H (1985) Analytical cybernetics of spider navigation. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 298–316Google Scholar
  20. Müller M, Wehner R (1988) Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5278–5290Google Scholar
  21. Nilsson D-E (1990) From cornea to retinal image in invertebrate eyes. Trends Neurosci 13:55–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nørgaard T, Henschel JR, Wehner R (2003) Long-distance navigation in the wandering desert spider Leucorchestris arenicola: can the slope of the dune surface provide a compass cue. J Comp Physiol A 189:801–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortego-Escobar J, Muñoz-Cuevas A (1999) Anterior median eyes of Lycosa tarantula (Araneae, Lycosidae) detect polarised light: behavioural experiments and electroretinographic analysis. J Arachnol 27:663–671Google Scholar
  24. Rossel S, Wehner R (1984) Celestial orientation in bees: the use of spectral cues. J Comp Physiol A 155:605–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rozenberg GV (1966) Twilight: a study in atmospheric optics. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Warrant EJ (2004) Vision in the dimmest habitats on earth. J Comp Physiol A 190:765–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wehner R (1982) Himmelsnavigation bei insekten. Neurophysiologie und verhalten. Neujahrsbl Naturforsch Ges Zürich 184:1–132Google Scholar
  28. Wehner R (1992) Arthropods. In: Papi F (ed) Animal homing. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 45–144Google Scholar
  29. Wehner R (1997) The ant’s celestial compass system: spectral and polarization channels. In: Lehrer M (ed) Orientation and communication in arthropods. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 145–185Google Scholar
  30. Wehner R, Duelli P (1971) The spatial orientation of desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor, before sunrise and after sunset. Experientia 27:1364–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wehner R, Räber F (1979) Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 35:1569–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (2003) Path integration in insects. In: Jeffery KJ (ed) The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–30Google Scholar
  33. Wehner R, Wehner S (1986) Path integration in desert ants. Approaching a long-standing puzzle in insect navigation. Monitore Zool Ital 20:309–331Google Scholar
  34. Wolf H, Wehner R (2000) Pinpointing food sources: olfactory and anemotactic orientation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Exp Biol 203:857–868PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Nørgaard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joh R. Henschel
    • 2
  • Rüdiger Wehner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of ZuerichZuerichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Gobabeb Training and Research CentreWalvis BayNamibia

Personalised recommendations