Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 189, Issue 9, pp 685–692 | Cite as

Gradual frequency rises in interacting black ghost knifefish, Apteronotus albifrons

  • P. Serrano-Fernández
Original Paper

Abstract

The present paper highlights the relationship between social status and production of gradual frequency rises in interacting Apteronotus albifrons. The gradual frequency rise production was mathematically inferred and a discrete classification deliberately avoided. The results showed little gradual frequency rise production before the hierarchy settlement. Afterwards, only the dominant fish kept this gradual frequency rise production at low levels, while the subdominant fish drastically increased it in all following interaction contexts. The hypothesis of gradual frequency rises being involved in communication as submissive signals was thus strengthened.

Keywords

Apteronotus Electric fish Electrocommunication EOD GFR 

Abbreviations

EOD

electric organ discharge

FM

frequency modulation

GFR

gradual frequency rise

IQR

interquartile range

JAR

jamming avoidance response

Notes

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank the whole team of the Zoology Institute of the University of Regensburg (Germany), where this research took place, for their friendly help . The experiments comply with the Principles of animal care, publication No. 86-23, revised 1985 of the National Institute of Health and also with the current laws of Germany and Spain.

References

  1. Bakeman R, Gottman JR (1997) Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bullock TH (1969) Species differences in effect electroreceptor input on electric organ pacemakers and other aspects of behavior in electric fish. Brain Behav Evol 2:85–118Google Scholar
  3. Bullock TH (1970) The reliability of neurons. J Gen Physiol 55:565–584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunlap KD (2002) Hormonal and body size correlates of electrocommunication behavior during dyadic interactions in a weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Horm Behav 41:187–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunlap KD, Pelczar PL, Knapp R (2002) Social interactions and cortisol treatment increase the production of aggressive electrocommunication signals in male electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Horm Behav 42:97–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Engler G, Zupanc GKH (2001) Differential production of chirping behavior evoked by electrical stimulation of the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J Comp Physiol A 187:747–756Google Scholar
  7. Engler G, Fogarty CM, Banks JR, Zupanc GKH (2000) Spontaneous modulations of the electric organ discharge in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus: a biophysical and behavioral analysis. J Comp Physiol A 186:645–660Google Scholar
  8. Hagedorn M, Heiligenberg W (1985) Court and spark: electric signals in the courting and mating of gymnotid fish. Anim Behav 33:254–265Google Scholar
  9. Heiligenberg W (1986) Jamming avoidance responses: model systems for neuroethology. In: Bullock TH, Heiligenberg W (eds) Electroreception. Wiley, New York, pp 613–649Google Scholar
  10. Hopkins CD (1972) Sex differences in electric signalling in an electric fish. Science 176:1035–1037Google Scholar
  11. Hopkins CD (1974a) Electric communication in the reproductive behavior of Sternopygus macrurus (Gymnotoidei). Z Tierpsychol 35:518–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopkins CD (1974b) Electric communication: functions in the social behavior of Eigenmannia virescens. Behaviour 50:270–305Google Scholar
  13. Kramer B (1990) Electrocommunication in teleost fishes. Behavior and experiments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Langner G, Scheich H (1978) Active phase coupling in electric fish: behavioural control with microsecond precision. J Comp Physiol 128:235–240Google Scholar
  15. Larimer JL, MacDonald JA (1968) Sensory feedback from electroreceptors to electromotor pacemaker centers in gymnotids. Am J Physiol 214:1253–1261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moortgat KT, Keller CH, Bullock TH, Sejnowski TJ (1998) Submicrosecond pacemaker precision is behaviorally modulated: the gymnotiform electromotor pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4684–4689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwassmann HO (1971) Circadian activity patterns in gymnotid electric fish. In: Menaker M (ed) Biochronometry. National Academy of Science, Washington DC, pp 186–199Google Scholar
  18. Tallarovic SK, Zakon HH (2002) Electrocommunication signals in female brown ghost knifefish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J Comp Physiol A 188:649–657Google Scholar
  19. Zupanc MM, Engler G, Midson A, Oxberry H, Hurst LA, Symon MR, Zupanc GKH (2001) Light-dark-controlled changes in modulations of the electric organ discharge in the teleost, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Anim Behav 62:1119–1128Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deptartment of Clinical Specialties, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of AlcaláAlcalá de HenaresSpain
  2. 2.Proteome CenterUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations