Journal of Classification

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 35–55 | Cite as

K-modes Clustering

  • Anil Chaturvedi
  • Paul E. Green
  • J. Douglas Caroll


We norm (defined as the limit of an Lp norm as p approaches zero).

In Monte Carlo simulations, both K-modes and the latent class procedures (e.g., Goodman 1974) performed with equal efficiency in recovering a known underlying cluster structure. However, K-modes is an order of magnitude faster than the latent class procedure in speed and suffers from fewer problems of local optima than do the latent class procedures. For data sets involving a large number of categorical variables, latent class procedures become computationally extremly slow and hence infeasible.

We conjecture that, although in some cases latent class procedures might perform better than K-modes, it could out-perform latent class procedures in other cases. Hence, we recommend that these two approaches be used as "complementary" procedures in performing cluster analysis. We also present an empirical comparison of K-modes and latent class, where the former method prevails.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Chaturvedi
    • 1
  • Paul E. Green
    • 2
  • J. Douglas Caroll
    • 3
  1. 1.Kraft FoodsGV529, 1 Kraft Court, Glennview, IL 60025, USAUSA
  2. 2.The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA
  3. 3.Rutgers UniversityGraduate School of ManagementUSA

Personalised recommendations