Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences, opportunities, and procedures

  • Article
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper reflects on consequentialism which underlies the traditional normative economics. It asserts that the informational basis of normative economics should be expanded so that the intrinsic value of social choice procedures should be properly taken into account along with the value of their consequences. Three examples – the problem of fair cake division, the role of competition in the promotion of economic welfare, and bilateral trade restrictions – are invoked to pinpoint the services rendered by procedural considerations in making social welfare judgements. The Pareto libertarian paradox is also re-examined within the extended framework incorporating procedural considerations along with consequential considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 25 March 1997 / Accepted: 8 July 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzumura, K. Consequences, opportunities, and procedures. Soc Choice Welfare 16, 17–40 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050129

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050129

Keywords

Navigation