Skip to main content
Log in

Outranking methods for multicriterion decision making: Arrow’s and Raynaud’s conjecture

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 Outranking methods constitute a class of ordinal ranking algorithms for multicriterion decision making. This paper is concerned with four such methods: Köhler’s primal and dual algorithms, and Arrow–Raynaud’s primal and dual algorithms. Arrow and Raynaud made the conjecture that these four methods yield the totality of “prudent orders” whenever the outranking matrix has the “constant sum” property. This paper shows that their conjecture is not valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: May 29, 1995/Accepted: November 13, 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lansdowne, Z. Outranking methods for multicriterion decision making: Arrow’s and Raynaud’s conjecture. Soc Choice Welfare 14, 125–128 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050056

Keywords

Navigation