Skip to main content
Log in

Acyclic sets of linear orders

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 A set of linear orders on {1,2, ℕ, n} is acyclic if no three of its orders have an embedded permutation 3-cycle {abc, cab, bca}. Let f (n) be the maximum cardinality of an acyclic set of linear orders on {1,2, ℕ, n}. The problem of determining f (n) has interested social choice theorists for many years because it is the greatest number of linear orders on a set of n alternatives that guarantees transitivity of majority preferences when every voter in an arbitrary finite set has any one of those orders as his or her preference order. This paper gives improved lower and upper bounds for f (n). We note that f (5)=20 and that all maximum acyclic sets at n=4, 5 are generated by an “alternating scheme.” This procedure becomes suboptimal at least by n=16, where a “replacement scheme” overtakes it. The presently-best large-n lower bound is approximately f (n)≥(2.1708)n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 5 April 1995/Accepted: 10 November 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishburn, P. Acyclic sets of linear orders. Soc Choice Welfare 14, 113–124 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050055

Keywords

Navigation