Correction to: Social Choice and Welfare https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01372-5

The production team incorrectly processed the author names in the reference list by mistake in the original publication of the article. The corrected reference list is given below:

References

Ahn DS, Oliveros S (2014) The Condorcet jur(ies) theorem. J Econ Theory 150:841–851

Boland PJ (1989) Majority systems and the Condorcet Jury Theorem. J R Stat Soc Ser D (Stat) 38(3):181–189

Bonnefon J-F (2010) Behavioral evidence for framing effects in the resolution of the doctrinal paradox. Soc Choice Welf 34(4):631–641

Bovens L, Rabinowicz W (2004) Voting procedures for complex collective decisions: an epistemic perspective. Ratio Juris 17(2):241–258

Bovens L, Rabinowicz W (2006) Democratic answers to complex questions—an epistemic perspective. Synthese 150(1):131–153

Bozbay I (2019) Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues. Soc Choice Welf 53(2):337–370

Camps R, Mora X, Saumell L (2012) A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues. Ann Math Artif Intell 64(1):39–72

Condorcet, MJAN Caritat de (1785) Essai sur l’application de l'analyse à la probabilité des decisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Imprimerie royale, Paris

de Clippel G, Eliaz K (2015) Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation. Games Econ Behav 89:34–42

Dietrich F (2007) A generalised model of judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 28(4):529–565

Dietrich F (2014) Scoring rules for judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 42(4):873–911

Dietrich F, List C (2004) A model of jury decisions where all jurors have the same evidence. Synthese 142(2):175–202

Dietrich F, List C (2007) Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 29(1):19–33

Dietrich F, List C (2007) Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Econ Philos 23(3):269–300

Dietrich F, Spiekermann K (2013) Epistemic democracy with defensible premises. Econ Philos 29(1):87–120

Dietrich F, Spiekermann K (2013) Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems. Mind 122(487):655–685

Egan JP (1975) Signal detection theory and ROC-analysis. Academic Press

Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(8):861–874

Hand DJ, Till RJ (2001) A simple generalisation of the area under the ROC curve for multiple class classification problems. Mach Learn 45(2):171–186

Karotkin D, Paroush J (2003) Optimum committee size: quality-versus-quantity dilemma. Soc Choice Welf 20(3):429–441

Kornhauser LA (1992) Modeling collegial courts I: path-dependence. Int Rev Law Econ 12(2):169–185

Kornhauser LA, Sager LG (1993) The one and the many: adjudication in collegial courts. Calif Law Rev 81(1)

Ladha KK (1992) The Condorcet jury theorem, free speech, and correlated voters. Am J Polit Sci 36:617–634

Ladha KK (1993) Condorcet’s jury theorem in light of de Finetti’s theorem. Soc Choice Welf 10(1):69–85

Ladha KK (1995) Information pooling through majority-rule voting: Condorcet’s jury theorem with correlated votes. J Econ Behav Org 26(3):353–372

List C (2005) The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions. Soc Choice Welf 24(1):3–32

List C (2006) The discursive dilemma and public reason. Ethics 116(2):362–402

List C (2012) The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review. Synthese 187(1):179–207

List C, Pettit P (2002) Aggregating sets of judgments: an impossibility result. Econ Philos 18(1):89–110

List C, Puppe C (2009) Judgment aggregation: a survey. In: Anand P, Pattanaik P K, Puppe C (eds), Handbook of rational and social choice, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Nehring K, Pivato M (2011) Incoherent majorities: the McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation. Discret Appl Math 159(15):1488–1507

Peleg B, Zamir S (2012) Extending the Condorcet jury theorem to a general dependent jury. Soc Choice Welf 39(1):91–125

Pivato M (2017) Epistemic democracy with correlated voters. J Math Econ 72:51–69

Sapir L (1998) The optimality of the expert and majority rules under exponentially distributed competence. Theor Decis 45(1):19–36

Terzopoulou Z, Endriss U (2019) Optimal truth-tracking rules for the aggregation of incomplete judgments. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT-2019)

Terzopoulou Z, Endriss U (2019) Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information. Soc Choice Welf 53(3):415–442


The original article has been corrected.