Cost asymmetry and incomplete information in a volunteer’s dilemma experiment
- 169 Downloads
We utilize a laboratory experiment to examine the effect of asymmetric costs in the volunteer’s dilemma, a public goods game where all players receive a benefit if at least one person volunteers and nothing otherwise, which presents a social dilemma where the optimal action for the individual differs from that for the group. Additionally, we introduce uncertainty to explore the role of information and find that individual behavior aligns most closely with the more intuitive Nash equilibrium strategies under full information and to a lesser extent with incomplete information. Although uncertainty about fellow group members’ costs incentivizes greater volunteering and thus has the potential to improve efficiency, we find that the inability to coordinate prevents groups from experiencing welfare gains as a result.
- Baron J (2008) Social dilemmas: cooperation versus defection in thinking and deciding, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Bergstrom T, Garratt R, Leo G (2015) Let me, or let George? Motives of competing altruists. Economics Working Paper Series qt48m9547q, Department of Economics, University of California, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
- Molina A, Chambers B (2010) Strangers who saved man from burning van ‘angels’. The Orange County Register, February 16, 2010Google Scholar
- Murnighan J, Kim J, Metzger A (1993) Volunteer dilemma. Adm Sci Q 38:515–538Google Scholar
- Vesterlund L, Babcock L, Recalde MP, Weingart L (2015) Breaking the glass ceiling with ‘no’: gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for non-promotable tasks. Discussion Paper, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar