Abstract
Various extensions of the leximin order to the infinite dimensional setting have been suggested. They relax completeness and strong anonymity. Instead, by removing sensitivity to generations at infinite rank this paper defines a complete and strongly anonymous leximin relation on infinite streams. The order is axiomatized, and it is shown to be the limit of extended rank-discounted utilitarianism for any utility function, as the discount factor approaches zero.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asheim GB (2010) Intergenerational equity. Annu Rev Econ 2: 197–222
Asheim GB, d’Aspremont C, Banerjee K (2010) Generalized time-invariant overtaking. J Math Econ 46: 519–533
Asheim GB, Banerjee K (2010) Fixed-step anonymous overtaking and catching-up. Int J Econ Theory 6: 149–165
Asheim GB, Tungodden B (2004) Resolving distributional conflicts between generations. Econ Theory 24: 221–230
Basu K, Mitra T (2003) Aggregating infinite utility streams with intergenerational equity: the impossibility of being Paretian. Econometrica 71: 1557–1563
Basu K, Mitra T (2007) Utilitarianism for infinite utility streams: a new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization. J Econ Theory 133: 350–373
Bossert W, Sprumont Y, Suzumura K (2007) Ordering infinite utility streams. J Econ Theory 135: 579–589
Brander J, Taylor S (1998) The simple economics of Easter Island: a Ricardo-Malthus model of renewable resource use. Am Econ Rev 88: 119–138
Cairns RD, Tian H (2010) Sustained development of a society with a renewable resource. J Econ Dyn Control 34: 1048–1061
Diamond P (1965) The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33: 170–177
Fleurbaey M, Michel P (2003) Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey criterion. J Math Econ 39: 777–802
Kamaga K, Kojima T (2009) Q-anonymous social welfare relations on infinite utility streams. Soc Choice Welf 33: 405–413
Kamaga K, Kojima T (2010) On the leximin and utilitarian overtaking criteria with extended anonymity. Soc Choice Welf 35: 377–392
Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28: 287–309
Lauwers L (1997) Infinite utility: insisting on strong monotonicity. Australas J Philos 75: 222–233
Lauwers L (2010) Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set. J Math Econ 46: 32–37
Lauwers L (2011) Strong anonymity and infinite streams, Discussion Paper 11.31, Center for Economic Studies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice, revised edition. The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sakai T (2010) Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria. Soc Choice Welf 35: 393–414
Sen A (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Svensson L-G (1980) Equity among generations. Econometrica 48: 1251–1256
Van Liedekerke L, Lauwers L (1997) Sacrificing the patrol: utilitarianism, future generations and infinity. Econ Philos 13: 159–74
Zame WR (2007) Can intergenerational equity be operationalized?. Theor. Econ. 2: 187–202
Zuber S, Asheim GB (2012) Justifying social discounting: the rank-discounted utilitarian approach. J Econ Theory 147: 1572–1601
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asheim, G.B., Zuber, S. A complete and strongly anonymous leximin relation on infinite streams. Soc Choice Welf 41, 819–834 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0705-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0705-z