Advertisement

Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 169–202 | Cite as

Quasi-decisiveness, quasi-ultrafilter, and social quasi-orderings

  • Susumu CatoEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to provide an axiomatic analysis of incomplete social judgments. In particular, we clarify the underlying power structure of Arrovian collective choice rules when social preferences are allowed to be incomplete. We propose the concept of quasi-decisiveness and investigate the properties of the collection of quasi-decisive sets associated with an Arrovian collective choice rule. In the course of this, we offer a series of applications.

Keywords

Social Choice Social Preference Econ Theory Complete Lattice Irrelevant Alternative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn, 1963. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aumann RJ (1962) Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 30: 445–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks JS (1995) Acyclic social choice from finite sets. Soc Choice Welf 12: 293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu K, Mitra T (2003) Aggregating infinite utility streams with intergenerational equity: the impossibility of being Paretian. Econometrica 71: 1557–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batteau P, Blin J-M, Monjardet B (1981) Stability of aggregation procedures, ultrafilters and simple games. Econometrica 49: 527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blair DH, Pollak RA (1982) Acyclic collective choice rules. Econometrica 50: 931–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair DH, Pollak RA (1983) Polychromatic acyclic tours in colored multigraphs. Math Oper Res 8: 471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau JH, Brown DJ (1989) The structure of neutral monotonic social functions. Soc Choice Welf 6: 51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossert W, Suzumura K (2008) A characterization of consistent collective choice rules. J Econ Theory 138: 311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bossert W, Suzumura K (2009) Decisive coallitions and coherence properties. Discussion Paper, Université de Montréal: CIREQGoogle Scholar
  11. Bossert W, Suzumura K (2010) Consistency, choice, and rationality. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Bossert W, Suzumura K (2011a) Multi-profile intergenerational social choice. Soc Choice Welf 37: 493–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bossert W, Suzumura K (2011b) Quasi-transitive and Suzumura consistent relations. Soc Choice Welf (forthcoming). doi: 10.1007/s00355-011-0600-z
  14. Bossert W, Sprumont Y, Suzumura K (2005) Consistent rationalizability. Economica 72: 185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown DJ (1974) An approximate solution to Arrow’s problem. J Econ Theory 9: 375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown DJ (1975) Aggregation of preferences. Quart J Econ 89: 456–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell DE, Kelly JS (2000) Weak independence and veto power. Econ Lett 66: 183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cato S, Hirata D (2010) Collective choice rules and collective rationality: a unified method of characterizations. Soc Choice Welf 34: 611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cato S (2011a) Pareto principles, positive responsiveness, and majority decisions. Theory Decis 71: 503–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cato S (2011b) Szpilrajn, Arrow, and Suzumura: concise proofs of extension theorems and an extension. Metroeconomica (forthcomming). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2011.04130.x
  21. Cato S (2011c) Social choice without the Pareto principle: a comprehensive analysis. Soc Choice Welfare, forthcomming. doi: 10.1007/s00355-011-0564-z
  22. Cato S (2012) Complements and consistent closures. Discret Math 312: 1218–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diamond P (1965) The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33: 170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubra J, Maccheroni F, Ok EA (2004) Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. J Econ Theory 115: 118–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eliaz K, Ok EA (2006) Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences. Games Econ Behav 56: 61–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ok EA, Ok EA (2011) On the multi-utility representation of preference relations. J Math Econ 47: 554–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferejohn J, Page T (1978) On the foundations of intertemporal choice. Am J Agr Econ 60: 269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fishburn PC (1970) Arrow’s impossibility theorem: concise proof and infinite voters. J Econ Theory 2: 103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fleurbaey M, Michel P (2003) Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey criterion. J Math Econ 39: 777–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gale D (1967) On optimal development in a multi-sector economy. Rev Econ Stud 65: 1–18Google Scholar
  31. Gibbard A (1969) Social choice and the Arrow condition (unpublished paper)Google Scholar
  32. Grafe F, Grafe J (1983) On Arrow-type impossibility theorems with infinite individuals and infinite alternatives. Econ Lett 11: 75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guha A (1972) Neutrality, monotonicity, and the right of veto. Econometrica 40: 821–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hansson B (1976) The existence of group preference functions. Public Choice 28: 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelsey D (1984) Acyclic choice without the Pareto principle. Rev Econ Stud 51: 693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelsey D (1985) Acyclic choice and group veto. Soc Choice Welf 2: 131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirman AP, Sondermann D (1972) Arrow’s theorem, many agents, and invisible dictators. J Econ Theory 5: 267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28: 287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levi I (1986) Hard choices: decision making under unresolved conflict. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mas-Colell A, Sonnenschein H (1972) General possibility theorems for group decisions. Rev Econ Stud 39: 185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ok EA (2002) Utility representation of an incomplete preference relation. J Econ Theory 104: 429–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Packel E (1980) Impossibility results in the axiomatic theory of intertemporal choice. Public Choice 35: 219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Packel EW (1981) Social decision functions and strongly decisive coalitions. Rev Econ Stud 48: 343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Packel EW (1984) Power structure and cardinality restrictions for Paretian social choice rules. Soc Choice Welf 1: 105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pazner EA, Wesley E (1977) Stability of social choices in infinitely large societies. J Econ Theory 14: 252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38: 543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sagi JS (2006) Anchored preference relations. J Econ Theory 130: 283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmitz N (1977) A further note on Arrow’s impossibility theorem. J Math Econ 4: 189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sen AK (1969) Quasi-transitivity, rational choice and collective decisions. Rev Econ Stud 36: 381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  51. Sen AK (1985) Commodities and capabilities. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  52. Sen AK (1992) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Sen AK (1997) Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica 65: 745–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sen AK (2004) Incompleteness and reasoned choice. Synthese 140: 43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sen AK (2012) The reach of social choice theory. Soc Choice Welf (forthcoming). doi: 10.1007/s00355-011-0613-7
  56. Suzumura K (1976) Remarks on the theory of collective choice. Economica 43: 381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suzumura K (1983) Rational choice, collective decisions, and social welfare. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Svensson L (1980) Equity among generations. Econometrica 48: 1251–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Szpilrajn S (1930) Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel. Fundam Math 16: 386–389Google Scholar
  60. von Weizsäcker CC (1965) Existence of optimal programs of accumulation for an infinite time horizon. Rev Econ Stud 32: 85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weymark JA (1984) Arrow’s theorem with social quasi-orderings. Public Choice 42: 235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams B (1973) A critique of utilitarianism. In: Smart JJC, Williams BAO (eds) Utilitarianism: for and against. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 156–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Social SciencesTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHachioji-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations