Abstract
This article uses Lancaster’s characteristics approach to rank sets of alternative combinations of commodity characteristics. It is assumed that there exists a reference point or reference level from which the individual evaluates set expansions in appropriate directions. We provide an axiomatic characterization for such a case.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Gaertner W, Xu Y (2008) A new class of measures of the standard of living based on functionings. Econ Theory 35: 201–215
Lancaster K (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74: 132–157
Pattanaik PK, Xu Y (1990) On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Rech Econ Louvain 56: 383–390
Pattanaik PK, Xu Y (2007) Minimal relativism, dominance, and standard of living comparisons based on functionings. Oxf Econ Pap 59: 354–374
Sen AK (1991) Welfare, preference and freedom. J Econom 50: 15–29
Sen AK (1993) Markets and freedoms. Oxf Econ Pap 45: 519–541
Simon HA (1957) Models of man. Wiley, New York
Xu Y (2002) Functioning, capability and the standard of living—an axiomatic approach. Econ Theory 20: 387–399
Xu Y (2003) On ranking compact and comprehensive opportunity sets. Math Soc Sci 45: 109–119
Xu Y (2004) On ranking linear budget sets in terms of freedom of choice. Soc Choice Welf 22: 281–289
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaertner, W., Xu, Y. Reference-dependent rankings of sets in characteristics space. Soc Choice Welf 37, 717–728 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0569-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0569-7