Skip to main content
Log in

Certificates of optimality: the third way to biproportional apportionment

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biproportional apportionment problem (BAP) must be faced in many proportional electoral systems where seats must be allocated to parties within regions. BAP is a non-trivial optimization problem, and only sophisticated algorithms are currently available for solving it. The issue is: are they “writable” as an actual law? Citizens rightly demand simple, easy to understand, voting systems. The alternative, though, seems to have simple, but unsound electoral laws. We propose the following way out of this dilemma: leave to a mathematically sophisticated algorithm the task of producing an optimal apportionment, but attach to it a “certificate of optimality”, that is, describe a simple procedure whereby anybody can check, through some elementary operations, that the seat allocation output by the algorithm is indeed an optimal apportionment. We discuss one such certificate, based on the Max flow- min cut Theorem, relative to a parametric max flow method of ours for BAP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja RK, Magnanti TL, Orlin JB (1993) Network flows theory, algorithms and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski ML (2004) Le Suffrage Universel Inachevè. Belin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski M, Demange G (1989a) An axiomatic approach to proportionality between matrices. Math Oper Res 14: 700–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balinski M, Demange G (1989b) Algorithms for proportional matrices in reals and integers. Math Programm 45: 193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balinski ML, Ramí rez V (1997) Mexican electoral Law: 1996 version. Elect Stud 16: 329–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balinski M, Young HP (2001) Fair representation—meeting the ideal of one man one vote, 2nd edn. Brookings Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffke N, Pukelsheim F (2008a) Divisor methods for proportional representation systems: An optimization approach to vector and matrix apportionment problems. Math Soc Sci 56: 166–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffke N, Pukelsheim F (2008b) Vector and matrix apportionment problems and separable convex integer optimization. Math Methods Oper Res 67: 133–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D (1957) A theorem on flows in networks. Pac J Math 7: 1073–1082

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier S, Pukelsheim F (2007) Bazi: a free computer program for proportional representation apportionment. Preprint Nr. 042/2007. Institut für Mathematik, Universität Augsburg, 2007. http://www.opus-bayern.de/uni-augsburg/volltexte/2007/711/

  • Pennisi A (2006) The Italian bug: a flawed procedure for bi-proportional seat allocation. In: Simeone B, Pukelsheim F (eds) Mathematics and democracy: recent advances in voting systems and collective choice. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi A, Ricca F, Simeone B (2005a) Malfunzionamenti dell’allocazione biproporzionale di seggi nella riforma elettorale italiana. Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate, Università La Sapienza, Roma, Serie A—Ricerche, no 21

  • Pennisi A, Ricca F, Simeone B (2005b) Legge elettorale con paradosso. La Voce, 11 Nov

  • Pennisi A, Ricca F, Simeone B (2006) Bachi e buchi della legge elettorale italiana nell’allocazione biproporzionale di seggi. Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale 79: 55–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukelsheim F (2004) BAZI: a Java program for proportional representation. Oberwolfach Reports 1:735–737. http://www.uni-augsburg.de/bazi

  • Serafini P, Simeone B (forthcoming) Parametric maximum flow methods for minimax approximation of target quotas in biproportional apportionment. Networks

  • Simeone, B, Pukelsheim, F (eds) (2006) Mathematics and democracy. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Serafini.

Additional information

While the paper was under revision, Bruno Simeone suddenly passed away. We will miss his wide scientific knowledge, his deep vision of the problems and his human kindness.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serafini, P., Simeone, B. Certificates of optimality: the third way to biproportional apportionment. Soc Choice Welf 38, 247–268 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0528-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0528-8

Keywords

Navigation