Skip to main content
Log in

On strategy-proof social choice correspondences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 February 2008

Abstract

We introduce two new concepts of strategy-proofness for social choice correspondences based on the theory of preferences over sets of alternatives under complete uncertainty. One is based on Pattanaik and Peleg (Soc Choice Welf 1:113–122, 1984) and the other is based on Bossert et al. (Econ Theory 16:295–312, 2000). We prove that there is no social choice correspondence satisfying anonymity, neutrality, a range condition, and either of our concepts of strategy-proofness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barberà S, Dutta B, Sen A (2001) Strategy-proof social choice correspondences. J Econ Theory 101: 374–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberà S, Bossert W, Pattanaik PK (2004) Ranking sets of objects. In: Barberà S, Hammond P, Seidl C (eds) Handbook of utility theory, vol 2. Kluwer, Boston, pp 893–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoît J-P (2002) Strategic manipulation in voting games when lotteries and ties are permitted. J Econ Theory 102: 421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert W, Pattanaik PK, Xu Y (2000) Choice under complete uncertainty: axiomatic characterizations of some decision rules. Econ Theory 16: 295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching S, Zhou L (2002) Multi-valued strategy-proof social choice rules. Soc Choice Welf 19: 569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan J, Schwartz T (2000) Strategic manipulability without resoluteness or shared beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite generalized. Soc Choice Welf 17: 85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman A (1979) Nonmanipulable multi-valued social decision functions. Public Choice 34: 177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1978) A strategic analysis of nonranked voting systems. SIAM J Appl Math 35: 488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P (1976) Manipulation of social choice functions. J Econ Theory 13: 217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P (1979) On definitions of manipulation of social choice functions. In: Laffont J-J (eds) Aggregation and revelation of preferences. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard A (1973) Manipulation of voting scheme: a general result. Econometrica 41: 587–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannai Y, Peleg B (1984) A note on the extension of an order on a set to the power set. J Econ Theory 32: 172–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JS (1977) Strategy-proofness and social choice functions without singlevaluedness. Econometrica 45: 439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik PK (1973) On the stability of sincere voting situations. J Econ Theory 6: 558–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik PK (1975) Strategic voting without collusion under binary and democratic group decision rules. Rev Econ Stud 42: 93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik PK, Peleg B (1984) An axiomatic characterization of the lexicographic maximin extension of an ordering over a set to the power set. Soc Choice Welf 1: 113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato S (2007) On constructing strategy-proof and democratic social choice correspondences: possibility and impossibility results. Keio Economic Society Discussion Paper Series Graduate Student No. :06–2

  • Satterthwaite M (1975) Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. J Econ Theory 10: 187–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin Sato.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0304-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, S. On strategy-proof social choice correspondences. Soc Choice Welfare 31, 331–343 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0285-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0285-5

Keywords

Navigation