Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 289–310 | Cite as

Lottery Rather than Waiting-line Auction

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the allocative efficiency of two non-price allocation mechanisms – the lottery (random allocation) and the waiting-line auction (queue system) – for the cases where consumers possess identical time costs (the homogeneous case), and where time costs are correlated with time valuations (the heterogeneous case). We show that the relative efficiency of the two mechanisms depends critically on a scarcity factor (measured by the ratio of the number of objects available for allocation over the number of participants) and on the shape of the distribution of valuations. We show that the lottery dominates the waiting-line auction for a wide range of situations, and that while consumer heterogeneity may improve the relative allocative efficiency of the waiting-line auction, the ranking on relative efficiency is not reversed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barzel Y (1974) A theory of rationing by waiting. J Law Econ 17:73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyce JR (1994) Allocation of goods by lottery. Econ Inq 32:457–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eckhoff T (1989) Lotteries in allocative situations. Soc Sci Inf 28:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elster J (1991) Local justice: how institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens. Eur Econ Rev 35:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodwin B (1992) Justice by lottery. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Hernandez F, Johnson RA (1980) The large sample behavior of transformation to normality. J Am Stat Assoc 75:855–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holt C, Sherman R (1982) Waiting line auction. J Polit Econ 90:280–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nichols D, Smolensky E, Tideman T (1971) Discrimination by waiting time in merit goods. Am Econ Rev 61:312–323Google Scholar
  9. Sah RK (1987) Queues, rations, and the market: Comparisons of outcomes for the poor and the rich. American Economic Review 77:69–77Google Scholar
  10. Suen W (1989) Rationing and rent dissipation in the presence of heterogeneous individuals. J Polit Econ 97:1384–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Taylor GA, Tsui KK, Zhu L (2003) Lottery or waiting-line auction. J Pub Econ 87:1313–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tobin J (1952) A Survey of the theory of rationing. Econometrica 20:521–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and Social SciencesSingapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.International Students OfficeThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations