Skip to main content
Log in

Application of a variational approach to the computation of forces around a wing

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present an application of the variational approach, introduced by Quartapelle and Napolitano (AIAA J 21:911–913, 1983) and developed further by Protas et al. (J Comput Phys 159:231–245, 2000), which requires only the velocity fields and its derivatives to determine forces acting on a body. First, the approach is presented and adapted to our 3D test problem. The obtained expression for the hydrodynamic force involves a harmonic function \(\eta\) whose determination is also presented. Then, numerical flow fields obtained with LES are used in order to evaluate the influence of different parameters on the forces and to offer a validation of the proposed approach. This allows us to assess the accuracy of the method and its advantages. Next, a comparison of the proposed variational approach with the momentum equation approach presented by David et al. (2009) is discussed. The momentum equation approach offers a non-intrusive method to determine forces, but requires the pressure field around the object. On the other hand, the variational approach requires the determination of the vorticity field on the surface of the wing, which is not always trivial to obtain with sufficient accuracy, but the computation of the pressure field can be avoided. This paper aims to compare both methods in a practical setting and show their relative advantages and sensitivities to different parameters for a 3D numerical/experimental study of a flow field around a NACA0015 airfoil. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of the variational approach in an experimental setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acher G (2019) Couplage de mesures de vitesse par Tomo-PIV et de déformation de profil, pour l’étude des interactions fluide-structure. Ph.D. Thesis, Universite de Poitiers

  • Acher G, Thomas L, Tremblais B, Gomit G, Chatellier L, David L (2019) Simultaneous measurements of flow velocity using Tomo-PIV and deformation of a flexible wing. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry, Munich

  • Chang C-C (1992) Potential flow and forces for incompressible viscous flow. Proc R Soc A 437:517–525

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C-C, Lei S-Y (1996) On the sources of aerodynamic forces: steady flow around a cylinder or a sphere. Proc R Soc A 452:2369–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C-C, Su J-Y, Lei S-Y (1998) On aerodynamic forces for viscous compressible flow. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 10:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David L, Jardin T, Farcy A (2009) On the non-intrusive evaluation of fluid forces with the momentum equation approach. Meas Sci Technol 20(9):095401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomit G, Acher G, Chatellier L, David L (2018) Uncertainty analysis of an optical method for pressure estimation in fluids. Meas Sci Technol 29(2):024004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götten F, Finger F, Havermann M, Braun C, Marino M, Bil C (2019) A highly automated method for simulating airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds number using a RANS — transition approach. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2019 DocumentID: 490026

  • Howe MS (1995) On the force and moment on a body in an incompressible fluid, with application to rigid bodies and bubbles at high and low Reynolds numbers. Q J Mech Appl Math 48:401–426

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jardin T, Chatellier L, Farcy A, David L (2009) Correlation between vortex structures and unsteady loads for flapping motion in hover. Exp Fluids 47:655–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon YJ, Gomit G, Earl T, Chatellier L, David L (2018) Sequential least-square reconstruction of instantaneous pressure field around a body from TR-PIV. Exp Fluids 59(2):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtulus DF, Scarano F, David L (2007) Unsteady aerodynamic forces estimation on a square cylinder by TR-PIV. Exp Fluids 42(2):185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill J (1986) Fundamentals concerning wave loading offshore structures. J Fluid Mech 173:667–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limacher E, McClure J, Yarusevych S, Morton C (2020) Comparison of momentum and impulse formulations for PIV-based force estimation. Meas Sci Technol 31(5):054001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JC, Rockwell D (1996) Force identification by vorticity fields: techniques based on flow imaging. J Fluids Struct 10:663–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noca F, Shiels D, Jeon D (1997) Measuring instantaneous fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J Fluids Struct 11:345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noca F, Shiels D, Jeon D (1999) A comparison of methods for evaluating time-dependent fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J Fluids Struct 13:551–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan LS, Chew YT (2002) A general formula for calculating forces on a 2-D arbitrary body in incompressible flow. J Fluids Struct 16:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protas B, Styczek A, Nowakowski A (2000) An Effective Approach to Computation of Force in Viscous Incompressible Flows. J Comput Phys 159:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protas B (2007) On an Attempt to Simplify the Quartapelle-Napolitano Approach to Computation of Hydrodynamic Forces in Open Flows. J Fluids Struct 23(8):1207–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quartapelle L, Napolitano M (1983) Force and moment in incompressible flows. AIAA J 21:911–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MK, Travin AK (2008) A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 29(6):1638–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal MF, Lin JC, Rockwell D (1997) Force prediction by PIV imaging: a momentum based approach. J Fluids Struct 11:965–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F, Casimiri EW (2006) Non-intrusive load characterization of an airfoil using PIV. Exp Fluids 40:988–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to an anonymous referee for constructive feedback which helped improve the presentation of the results. The current work has been conducted as part of the EVAPOR Astrid project, funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche and the DGA, Grant No. NR-16-ASTR-0005-01 and the CPER FEDER project of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Region. BP acknowledges partial support through an NSERC Discovery Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díaz-Arriba, D., Protas, B., Acher, G. et al. Application of a variational approach to the computation of forces around a wing. Exp Fluids 63, 31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03376-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03376-4

Navigation