Abstract
The micro-cavity array is a unique surface geometry which aims to passively dampen the total energy of coherent motions within the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. Previous works have shown the effectiveness of this device, in particular the reduction of sweep and turbulence intensities by 13% and 14%, respectively. Preliminary parametric studies and investigations have been made on the cavity array, particularly regarding its geometry and configuration of the backing cavity, however there are still gaps in the knowledge of ideal geometric features of the cavities themselves. This paper presents a parametric study to investigate the sensitivity of the micro-cavity array’s ability to attenuate turbulence within the boundary layer to the aspect ratio of the orifices installed (length on diameter of orifices) and to further understand the physics behind the flow effected by the array itself. Five distinct orifice aspect ratios were investigated using constant temperature anemometry in a zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer flow. The velocity profiles generated were compared to a canonical boundary layer flow, and a relationship between the reduction in turbulence statistics and aspect ratio was constructed. Reductions in turbulence intensity were greater as the aspect ratio of the orifices increased, with a maximum reduction of 12.9% for a momentum-based Reynolds number of \({\text {Re}}_\theta = 3283\) and orifice length of \(l^+=534\) (normalized by viscous wall units). When observing a fixed wall height, both sweep intensity and streamwise turbulent kinetic energy supported the turbulence intensity results. The pre-multiplied energy spectra were reduced by a maximum of 11% for \({\text {Re}}_\theta = 4651\) at the largest orifice length tested (\(l^+=763\)). The results from this paper indicate that the orifices of a micro-cavity array should be as large as possible, however this claim is only true for the orifice lengths investigated in this paper (\(105< l^+ < 763\)).
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackwelder R, Kaplan R (1976) On the wall structure of the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 76(1):89–112
Breugem WP, Boersma BJ, Uittenbogaard RE (2006) The influence of wall permeability on turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 562:35
Choi KS, Jukes T, Whalley R (2011) Turbulent boundary-layer control with plasma actuators. Philos Trans R Soc 369(1940):1443–1458
Clauser FH (1956) The turbulent boundary layer. In: Advances in applied mechanics. Elsevier, pp 1-51
Corke TC, Thomas FO (2018) Active and passive turbulent boundary-layer drag reduction. AIAA J 56(10):3835–3847
Gad-el-Hak M (1994) Interactive control of turbulent boundary layers–a futuristic overview. AIAA J 32(9):1753–1765
Garcia-Mayoral R, Jimnez J (2011) Drag reduction by riblets. Philos Trans R Soc A 3691940:1412–1427
Ghaemi S, Scarano F (2011) Counter-hairpin vortices in the turbulent wake of a sharp trailing edge. J Fluid Mech 689:317–356
Ghanadi F, Arjomandi M, Cazzolato BS, Zander AC (2015) Analysis of the turbulent boundary layer in the vicinity of a self-excited cylindrical Helmholtz resonator. J Turbul 16(8):705–728
Kline SJ, Reynolds WC, Schraub FA, Runstadler PW (1967) The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 30(4):741–773
Kornilov VI (2005) Skin-friction reduction on body of revolution using boundary-layer alteration devices. AIAA J 43(10):2125–2132
Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Antonia RA (2007) Properties of d- and k-type roughness in a turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids 19(12):125101
Lockerby D (2001) Numerical simulation of boundary layer control using MEMS actuation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick (United Kingdom)
MacDonald M, Chung D, Hutchins N, Chan L, Ooi A, Garcia-Mayoral R (2017) The minimalspan channel for rough-wall turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 816:5–42
Marec J (2000) Drag reduction: a major task for research. In: Thiede P (ed) Aerodynamic drag reduction technologies. Springer, Berlin
Okazaki Y, Takase Y, Kuwata Y, Suga K (2021) Describing characteristic parameters of turbulence over two-dimensional porous roughness. J Therm Sci Technol 16(2):JTST0027–JTST0027
Perry AE, Schofield WH, Joubert PN (1969) Rough wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 37(2):383–413
Qin S, Chu N, Yao Y, Liu J, Huang B, Wu D (2017) Stream-wise distribution of skin-friction drag reduction on a at plate with bubble injection. Phys Fluids 29(3):37103
Robinson SK (1991) Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23(1):601–639
Schlatter P, Örlü R (2012) Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: in flow length and tripping effects. J Fluid Mech 710:5–34
Silvestri A (2018) The attenuation of sweep events within the turbulent boundary layer over a at plate using a micro-cavity array. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Adelaide
Silvestri A, Ghanadi F, Arjomandi M, Cazzolato B, Zander A (2017a) Attenuation of sweep events in a turbulent boundary layer using micro-cavities. Exp Fluids 58(5):58
Silvestri A, Ghanadi F, Arjomandi M, Chin R, Cazzolato B, Zander A (2017b) Attenuation of turbulence by the passive control of sweep events in a turbulent boundary layer using micro-cavities. Phys Fluids 29(11):115102
Silvestri A, Ghanadi F, Arjomandi M, Cazzolato B, Zander A (2018a) The application of different tripping techniques to determine the characteristics of the turbulent boundary layer over a at plate. J Fluids Eng 140(1)
Silvestri A, Ghanadi F, Arjomandi M, Cazzolato B, Zander A, Chin R (2018b) Mechanism of sweep event attenuation using micro-cavities in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 30(5):055108
Silvestri A, Jafari A, Bhat S, Severino G, Cazzolato B, Arjomandi M (2020) The control of a turbulent boundary layer by the application of a microcavity array. In: 22nd Australasian fluid mechanics conference, Australasian fluid mechanics conference
Townsend AA (1976) The structure of turbulent shear flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Walsh MJ (1983) Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. AIAA J 21(4):485–486
Whalley RD, Choi KS (2014) Turbulent boundary layer control with plasma spanwise travelling waves. Exp Fluids 55(8):1–6
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship and by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council (Project Number ARC DP-200101961). Research undertaken for this report has been assisted with a grant from the Sir Ross and Sir Keith Smith Fund (Smith Fund) (www.smithfund.org.au). The support is acknowledged and greatly appreciated. The Smith Fund by providing funding for this project does not verify the accuracy of any findings or any representations contained in it. Any reliance on the findings in any written report or information provided to you should be based solely on your own assessment and conclusions. The Smith Fund does not accept any responsibility or liability from any person, company or entity that may have relied on any written report or representations contained in this report if that person, company or entity suffers any loss (financial or otherwise) as a result.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Severino, G.F., Silvestri, A., Cazzolato, B.S. et al. Sensitivity analysis of orifice length of micro-cavity array for the purpose of turbulence attenuation. Exp Fluids 63, 24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03371-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03371-9