Abstract
This work applied fast mesoporous-particle-based pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) to obtain the time-resolved flow dynamics inside fluidic oscillators with jet speed up to 0.7 Mach and oscillation frequencies higher than 1 kHz. The frequency of the oscillator decreases as the feedback channel length increases. The frequency characteristics can be divided into a linear growth stage and a slow change stage. The external velocity characteristic of the oscillator also presented a double-peak phenomenon. Pressure wave reflection theory was used to explain the double-peak phenomenon of velocity, which was verified according to the PSP dynamic pressure field. In addition, the proper orthogonal decomposition method was applied to the PSP snapshots to further explain the dominating pressure propagation and small-scale pressure changes.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- HPCW:
-
High pressure compression wave
- LPEW:
-
Low pressure expansion wave
- MP-PSP:
-
Mesoporous-particle-based pressure-sensitive paint
- PC-PSP:
-
Polymer-ceramic pressure-sensitive paint
- PSP:
-
Pressure-sensitive paint
- POD:
-
Proper orthogonal decomposition
- Wind-off Average:
-
The average value of 5000 wind-off images
- Wind-on Average:
-
The average value of 10,000 wind-on images
- L f :
-
The length of the feedback channel
- P i :
-
Inlet pressure (bar)
- U max :
-
The velocity at the outlet of oscillator
- U max :
-
The maximum value of velocity at the outlet of oscillator
- U min :
-
The minimum value of velocity at the outlet of oscillator
- B 1 :
-
The center of the straight channel of the left half of the oscillator
- C 1 :
-
The entrance of the feedback channel of the left half of the oscillator
- C 2 :
-
The entrance of the feedback channel of the right half of the oscillator
- D 1 :
-
The center of the straight channel of the left half of the oscillator
- E 1 :
-
The exit of the feedback channel of the left half of the oscillator
- I on :
-
Intensity of PSP (count)
- I ref :
-
Intensity of PSP at reference condition (count)
- P ref :
-
Pressure at reference condition (kPa)
- t C1D1 :
-
The time for the high voltage to propagate from point C1 to point D1
- t C1E1 :
-
The time for the high voltage to propagate from point C1 to point E1
- t C1C2 :
-
The time for the high voltage to propagate from point C1 to point C2
- L C1E1 :
-
The length for the high voltage to propagate from point C1 to point E1
- U C1E1 :
-
The velocity for the high voltage to propagate from point C1 to point E1
- T t :
-
The transmission time of the pressure wave in the feedback channel on one side
- T s :
-
The deflection time of the main jet to overcome the wall effect
- c :
-
Velocity of sound
- St:
-
Stanton number (fLf/UC1E1)
- P 1 :
-
The increased pressure at point C1 is affected by the reflected high wave
- P 2 :
-
The value of pressure of C1 is higher than that of B1 when B1 and C1 both reach the highest point
- P 3 :
-
The difference between the lowest value of the pressure at point E1 and the lowest value of the pressure in the feedback channel
- P 4 :
-
The increased pressure at point D1 is affected by the reflected high wave
- P 5 :
-
The increased pressure at point D1 is affected by the reflected low wave
- ∆U :
-
The drop value of the exit velocity at the peak of the small wave
- ∆t :
-
The duration of the exit velocity at the peak of the small wave
References
Arote A, Bade M, Banerjee J (2019) Numerical investigations on stability of the spatially oscillating planar two-phase liquid jet in a quiescent atmosphere. Phys Fluids 31(11):112103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123762
Arwatz G, Fono I, Seifert A (2008) Suction and oscillatory blowing actuator. In: IUTAM symposium on flow control and MEMS (IUTAM Bookseries). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6858-4_4
Bobusch B, Woszidlo R, Bergada J, Nayeri C, Paschereit C (2013a) Experimental study of the internal flow structures inside a fluidic oscillator. Exp Fluids 54(6):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1559-6
Bobusch BC, Woszidlo R, Krüger O, Paschereit CO (2013) Numerical investigations on geometric parameters affecting the oscillation properties of a fluidic oscillator. In: 21st AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, p 2709. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2709
Bohan B, Polanka M, Rutledge J (2019) Sweeping jets issuing from the face of a backward-facing step. J Fluids Eng 141(12):121201. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043576
Coanda H (1936) Device for deflecting a stream of elastic fluid projected into an elastic fluid. United States Patent 2(052):869
Crafton JW, Gregory J, Sellers M, Ruyten W (2017) Data processing tools for dynamic pressure-sensitive paint. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0701
Dolgopyat D, Seifert A (2019) Active flow control virtual maneuvering system applied to conventional airfoil. AIAA J 57(1):72–89. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056258
Gaertlein S, Woszidlo R, Ostermann F, Nayeri C, Paschereit CO (2014) The time-resolved internal and external flow field properties of a fluidic oscillator. In: 52nd Aerospace sciences meeting, p 1143. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-1143
Gosen F, Ostermann F, Woszidlo R, Nayeri CN, Paschereit CO (2015) Experimental investigation of compressibility effects in a fluidic oscillator. In: 53rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2015-0782. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0782
Greenblatt D, Whalen E, Wygnanski I (2019) Introduction to the flow control virtual collection. AIAA J 57(8):3111–3114. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058507
Gregory J, Sakaue H, Liu T, Sullivan J (2014) Fast pressure-sensitive paint for flow and acoustic diagnostics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 46(1):303–330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141304
Jentzsch M, Taubert L, Wygnanski I (2019) Using sweeping jets to trim and control a tailless aircraft model. AIAA J 57(6):2322–2334. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056962
Jiao L, Peng D, Wen X, Liu Y, Gregory JW (2018). Experimental study of the interaction between rotor wake and a cylinder in hover. In: Applied aerodynamics conference, AIAA 2018-4214. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4214
Kim S, Kim H, Kim K (2019) Measurement of two-dimensional heat transfer and flow characteristics of an impinging sweeping jet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 136:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.03.021
Kim S, Kim H (2019) Quantitative visualization of the three-dimensional flow structures of a sweeping jet. J vis 22(3):437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-00546-1
Kourta A, Leclerc C (2013) Characterization of synthetic jet actuation with application to Ahmed body wake. Sens Actuators A Phys 192:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.12.008
Meng X, Xu C, Yu H (2013) Feedback fluidic flowmeters with curved attachment walls. Flow Meas Instrum 30:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2013.02.006
Mohammadshahi S, Samsam-Khayani H, Nematollahi O, Kim KC (2020) Flow characteristics of a wall attaching oscillating jet over single-wall and double-wall geometries. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 112:110009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.110009
Ostermann F, Woszidlo R, Nayeri C, Paschereit C O (2015) Experimental comparison between the flow field of two common fluidic oscillator designs. In: 53rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2015-0781. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0781
Peng D, Gu F, Li Y, Liu Y (2018) A novel sprayable fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint based on mesoporous silicone dioxide particles. Sens Actuators A Phys 279:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.06.048
Peng D, Xie F, Liu X, Lin J, Li Y, Zhong J, Zhang Q, Liu Y (2020) Experimental study on hypersonic shock–body interaction between bodies in close proximity using translucent fast pressure- and temperature-sensitive paints. Exp Fluids 61(5):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-02948-0
Perry AE, Morrison GL (1971) A study of the constant-temperature hot-wire anemometer. J Fluid Mech 47(3):577–599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112071001241
Raman G, Packiarajan S, Papadopoulos G, Weissman C, Raghu S (2005) Jet thrust vectoring using a miniature fluidic oscillator. Aeronaut J 109(1093):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000000634
Raman G, Raghu S (2004) Cavity resonance suppression using miniature fluidic oscillators. AIAA J 42(12):2608–2612. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.521
Schmidt H, Woszidlo R, Nayeri C, Pascherei C (2017) Separation control with fluidic oscillators in water. Exp Fluids 58(8):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2392-0
Simões E, Furlan R, Bruzetti Leminski R, Gongora-Rubio M, Pereira M, Morimoto N, Santiago Avilés J (2005) Microfluidic oscillator for gas flow control and measurement. Flow Meas Instrum 16(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2004.11.001
Sirovich L, Kirby M (1987) Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 4(3):519–524. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.4.000519
Tesař V, Zhong S, Rasheed F (2013) New fluidic-oscillator concept for flow separation control. AIAA J 51(2):397–405. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051791
Tomac M, Gregory J (2014) Internal jet interactions in a fluidic oscillator at low flow rate. Exp Fluids 55(5):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1730-8
Tomac M, Sundström E (2019) Adjustable frequency fluidic oscillator with supermode frequency. AIAA J 57(8):3349–3359. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058301
Wang J, Choi K, Feng L, Jukes T, Whalley R (2013) Recent developments in DBD plasma flow control. Prog Aerosp Sci 62:52–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.05.003
Wang S, Baldas L, Colin S, Orieux S, Kourta A, Mazellier N (2016) Experimental and numerical study of the frequency response of a fluidic oscillator for active flow control. In: 8th AIAA flow control conference, AIAA 2016-4234. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-4234
Wang S, Batikh A, Baldas L, Kourta A, Mazellier N, Colin S, Orieux S (2019) On the modelling of the switching mechanisms of a Coanda fluidic oscillator. Sens Actuators A Phys 299:111618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.111618
Wen X, Li Z, Zhou L, Yu C, Muhammad Z, Liu Y, Wang S, Liu Y (2020) Flow dynamics of a fluidic oscillator with internal geometry variations. Phys Fluids 32(7):075111. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0012471
Wen X, Liu Y, Tang H (2018) Unsteady behavior of a sweeping impinging jet: time-resolved particle image velocimetry measurements. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 96:111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.02.033
Whalen E, Shmilovich A, Spoor M, Tran J, Vijgen P, Lin J, Andino M (2018) Flight test of an active flow control enhanced vertical tail. AIAA J 56(9):3393–3398. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056959
Woszidlo R, Ostermann F, Nayeri C, Paschereit C (2015) The time-resolved natural flow field of a fluidic oscillator. Exp Fluids 56(6):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1993-8
Xu Y, Feng L, Wang J (2013) Experimental investigation of a synthetic jet impinging on a fixed wall. Exp Fluids 54(5):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1512-8
Yang J, Chen C, Tsai K, Lin W, Sheen H (2007) A novel fluidic oscillator incorporating step-shaped attachment walls. Sens Actuators A Phys 135(2):476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.09.016
Zhang B, Liu K, Zhou Y, To S, Tu J (2018) Active drag reduction of a high-drag Ahmed body based on steady blowing. J Fluid Mech 856:351–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.703
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12072196), Advanced Jet Propulsion Innovation Center (AEAC HKCX2019-01-016; HKCX2020-02-028), Aero-engine Foundation (6141B09050399), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19JC1412900) and the Oceanic Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SL2020MS006) extended to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, L., Wang, S., Song, J. et al. Study of internal time-resolved flow dynamics of a subsonic fluidic oscillator using fast pressure sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 63, 17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03370-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03370-w