Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nucleation and cavitation number effects on tip vortex cavitation dynamics and noise

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial and acoustic characteristics of tip vortex cavitation (TVC) inception were measured in a cavitation tunnel. Numerous cavitation events were recorded to reveal the influence of different nuclei populations and cavitation numbers on nuclei capture and activation physics, and the role of the streamwise pressure distribution in a vortex. Synchronised high speed video and hydrophone measurements of cavitation events were taken in the trailing vortex of an elliptical hydrofoil at an incidence of \(6^\circ \) and a Reynolds number of \(1.5\times 10^6\). The injected nuclei population in the tunnel test section was varied by using different microbubble generators mounted upstream of the test section. Both the nuclei population and cavitation number have a significant effect on the inception location distribution along the trailing vortex, and in particular, inception event rates. The cavitation number alters the flow volume subjected to tension, thereby also affecting the shape of the inception location distribution. Once the nuclei are activated, cavity kinematic and acoustic properties are influenced by the local pressure (i.e. inception location and cavitation number) more so than initial nucleus size, at least in the \(\sim \)50–100 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\) diameter range considered in this study. Inception events that occur near the tip generate stronger acoustic pulses. At these inception locations, the frequency of the tonal peak associated with inception remains relatively constant for the two nuclei populations, but increases with cavitation number. This study provides insights into the roles of nucleation and cavitation number in TVC and informs future measurements and predictions of TVC dynamics and noise.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt RE, Keller AP (1992) Water quality effects on cavitation inception in a trailing vortex. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 114(3):430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt R, Maines B (2000) Nucleation and bubble dynamics in vortical flows. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 122(3):488–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asnaghi A, Svennberg U, Bensow RE (2020) Large eddy simulations of cavitating tip vortex flows. Ocean Eng 195:106703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astolfi JA, Fruman D, Billard JY (1999) A model for tip vortex roll-up in the near field region of three-dimensional foils and the prediction of cavitation onset. Eur J Mech B Fluids 18(4):757–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandner P, Lecoffre Y, Walker G (2007) Design considerations in the development of a modern cavitation tunnel. In: 16th Australasian fluid mechanics conference

  • Brennen CE (1995) Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Briançon-Marjollet L, Merle L (1996) Inception, development and noise of a tip vortex cavitation. In: Proceedings of 21st symposium on naval hydrodynamics, pp 851–864

  • Chang N, Ganesh H, Yakushiji R, Ceccio SL (2011) Tip vortex cavitation suppression by active mass injection. J Fluids Eng 133(11):111301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Zhang L, Peng X, Shao X (2019) Influence of water quality on the tip vortex cavitation inception. Phys Fluids 31(2):023303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Ceccio SL (2007) Dynamics and noise emission of vortex cavitation bubbles. J Fluid Mech 575:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi JK, Chahine GL (2003) A numerical study on the bubble noise and the tip vortex cavitation inception. J Ship Ocean Technol 7(3):13–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi JK, Chahine GL (2004) Noise due to extreme bubble deformation near inception of tip vortex cavitation. Phys Fluids 16(7):2411–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Hsiao CT, Chahine G, Ceccio S (2009) Growth, oscillation and collapse of vortex cavitation bubbles. J Fluid Mech 624:255–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolan C, Brandner P, Butler D, Pearce B, Moreau D, Brooks L (2013) Hydroacoustic characterisation of the AMC cavitation tunnel. In: Acoustics 2013 Victor Harbor—Science, Technology and Amenity. The Australian Acoustical Society, Victor Harbor, Australia, pp 1–7

  • Ffowcs Williams J, Hawkings DL (1969) Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 264:321–342

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick HM (1958) Cavitation noise. In: 2nd symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Washington

  • Franc JP, Michel JM (2006) Fundamentals of cavitation. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fruman D, Dugue C (1994) Tip vortex roll-up and cavitation. In: Proceedings of 19th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, pp 633–654

  • Gindroz B, Billet M (1998) Influence of the nuclei on the cavitation inception for different types of cavitation on ship propellers. J Fluids Eng 120(1):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gindroz B, Billard JY, Geistdoerfer P (1995) Cavitation nuclei measurements at sea. ASME Publ HTD 321:497–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Giosio D, Pearce B, Brandner P (2016) Influence of pressure on microbubble production rate in a confined turbulent jet. In: 20th Australasian fluid mechanics conference

  • Gowing S, Shen YT (2001) Nuclei effects on tip vortex cavitation scaling. In: 4th international symposium on cavitation, California

  • Higuchi H, Arndt R, Rogers M (1989) Characteristics of tip vortex cavitation noise. J Fluids Eng 111:495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao CT, Chahine GL (2005) Scaling of tip vortex cavitation inception noise with a bubble dynamics model accounting for nuclei size distribution. J Fluids Eng 127(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BD (1986) Bubble populations: background and breaking waves. In: Oceanic whitecaps. Springer, pp 69–73. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-009-4668-2

  • Khoo M, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P (2018) Nucleation effects on hydrofoil tip vortex cavitation. In: 21st Australasian fluid mechanics conference

  • Khoo M, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P (2020a) Nucleation effects on tip vortex cavitation inception location. In: 22nd Australasian fluid mechanics conference. The University of Queensland

  • Khoo M, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P (2020b) Statistical aspects of tip vortex cavitation inception and desinence in a nuclei deplete flow. Exp Fluids 61(6):145

  • Khoo M, Venning J, Pearce B, Takahashi K, Mori T, Brandner P (2020c) Natural nuclei population dynamics in cavitation tunnels. Exp Fluids 61(2):34

  • Lamb H (1945) Hydrodynamics. Dover Publications, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leighton T (2012) The acoustic bubble. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligneul P, Latorre R (1989) Study on the capture and noise of spherical nuclei in the presence of the tip vortex of hydrofoils and propellers. Acta Acust United Acust 68(1):1–14

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ligneul P, Latorre R (1993) Study of nuclei distribution and vortex diffusion influence on nuclei capture by a tip vortex and nuclei capture noise. J Fluids Eng 115(3):504–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maines B, Arndt R (1993) Bubble dynamics of cavitation inception in a wing tip vortex. In: ASME cavitation and multiphase flow forum, FED, 1993, vol 153, pp 93–97

  • Minnaert M (1933) XVI. On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 16(104):235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neppiras EA (1980) Acoustic cavitation. Phys Rep 61(3):159–251

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hern T, Green S, Morss E (1986) Measurements of oceanic nuclei distributions. In: ASME cavitation and multiphase flow forum, pp 23–26

  • Oweis G, van der Hout I, Iyer C, Tryggvason G, Ceccio S (2005) Capture and inception of bubbles near line vortices. Phys Fluids 17(2):022105

  • Paul R, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P (2021) Nuclei transport about a sphere. In: 11th international symposium on cavitation (CAV2021), Daejon, Korea

  • Peng X, Xu L, Cao Y (2017) The study of tip vortex flow and cavitation inception on an elliptical hydrofoil. In: Proceedings of fifth international symposium on marine propulsion, Espoo, Finland

  • Pennings P, Bosschers J, Westerweel J, Van Terwisga T (2015) Dynamics of isolated vortex cavitation. J Fluid Mech 778:288–313

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Russell P, Giosio D, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P, Aumelas V, Maj G (2018) Towards real-time optical measurement of microbubble content in hydrodynamic test facilities. In: 10th international symposium on cavitation (CAV2018), Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp 1056–1061

  • Russell P, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P (2020a) Calibration of Mie scattering imaging for microbubble measurement in hydrodynamic test facilities. Exp Fluids 61(4):93

  • Russell PS, Barbaca L, Venning JA, Pearce BW, Brandner PA (2020b) Measurement of nuclei seeding in hydrodynamic test facilities. Exp Fluids 61(3):79

  • Testa C, Ianniello S, Salvatore F (2018) A Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings formulation for hydroacoustic analysis of propeller sheet cavitation. J Sound Vib 413:421–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch P (1967) The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 15(2):70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the University of Tasmania and the Defence Science and Technology Group. The authors thank Dr Rhys Paul for assistance with data acquisition, and AMC technical officers, Mr Robert Wrigley and Mr Steven Kent for providing technical assistance with test facility configuration and operation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maritime Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Melbourne, Australia

    M. T. Khoo

  2. Cavitation Research Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

    M. T. Khoo, J. A. Venning, B. W. Pearce & P. A. Brandner

Authors
  1. M. T. Khoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. A. Venning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. W. Pearce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. A. Brandner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived experiment design: MTK, JAV, PAB. Performed experiments: JAV, MTK. Analysed data: MTK, JAV. Prepared manuscript: MTK, JAV, PAB, BWP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. Khoo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoo, M.T., Venning, J.A., Pearce, B.W. et al. Nucleation and cavitation number effects on tip vortex cavitation dynamics and noise. Exp Fluids 62, 216 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03308-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03308-2

Search

Navigation