Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic evaluation of streamline topologies for the detection of preferential flow configurations in PIV applications

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While PIV allows the extraction of instantaneous streamlines, the availability of typically thousands of patterns hampers a statistical understanding of the underlying flow topology. A particular application is oscillating gas jets, encountered in scientific and industrial studies dealing with mass transfer and flow control. Multiple methods, such as statistical moments (including mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis), proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), and Hartigan’s dip test are common post-processing methodologies. However, as demonstrated in this paper, they do not provide sufficient in-depth information from a statistical perspective to attribute probabilities to potential flow topologies. In this work, a novel approach to describe probability distributions based on extracted streamline patterns is proposed. Based on the available streamline patterns, the convolution with adaptive Gaussian kernels reveals the probability density function of the flow topology. The proposed methodology, as well as more traditional post-processing approaches, are assessed on the basis of synthetic flow fields and experimental PIV data of oscillating impinging gas jets, demonstrating the added value of the streamline probability map in characterising the scrutinised flow.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hereafter, the methodology will be referred to by SPDF, while the probabilistic outcome is designated by the lower case letters \(\mathrm{spdf}\).

References

  • Basser PJ, Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C, Duda J, Aldroubi A (2000) In vivo fiber tractography using dt-mri data. Magn Reson Med 44(4):625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL (1993) The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25(1):539–575

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brøns M (2007) Streamline topology: patterns in fluid flows and their bifurcations. Adv Appl Mech 41:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudzinski MR, Thurber CH, Hacker BR, Engdahl ER (2007) Global prevalence of double benioff zones. Science 316(5830):1472–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druault P, Guibert P, Alizon F (2005) Use of proper orthogonal decomposition for time interpolation from piv data. Exp Fluids 39(6):1009–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA (1985) Statistical theory in clustering. J Classif 2(1):63–76

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA, Hartigan PM et al (1985) The dip test of unimodality. Ann Stat 13(1):70–84

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi H, Zhang J, Furuya S, Muzas BK (1998) Immediate and near wake flow patterns behind slotted disks. AIAA J 36(9):1626–1634. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koklu M, Owens LR (2017) Comparison of sweeping jet actuators with different flow-control techniques for flow-separation control. AIAA J 55(3):848–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumley J, Yaglom A, Tatarski V (1967) The inertial subrange in nonequilibrium turbulence.  In: Yaglom AM, Tatarski VI (eds) Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation. Nauka, pp 157–164

  • Mendez M, Raiola M, Masullo A, Discetti S, Ianiro A, Theunissen R, Buchlin JM (2017) Pod-based background removal for particle image velocimetry. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 80:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez M, Scelzo M, Buchlin JM (2018) Multiscale modal analysis of an oscillating impinging gas jet. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 91:256–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheather SJ (2004) Density estimation. Stat Sci 19(4):588–597. https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simonini A, Theunissen R, Masullo A, Vetrano M (2019) Piv adaptive interrogation and sampling with image projection applied to water sloshing. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 102:559–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.12.016. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894177718314109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. i. coherent structures. Q Appl Math 45(3):561–571

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BL, Glezer A (2002) Jet vectoring using synthetic jets. J Fluid Mech 458:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taira K, Brunton SL, Dawson ST, Rowley CW, Colonius T, McKeon BJ, Schmidt OT, Gordeyev S, Theofilis V, Ukeiley LS (2017) Modal analysis of fluid flows: an overview. AIAA J 55:4013–4041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecplot, Inc (2018) User's Manual. Tecplot 360 EX 2018 R1

  • Theofilis V (2011) Global linear instability. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43(1):319–352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160705

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen R, Edwards M (2018) A general approach to evaluate the ensemble cross-correlation response for piv using kernel density estimation. Exp Fluids 59(11):174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2627-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen R, Scarano F, Riethmuller M (2008) On improvement of piv image interrogation near stationary interfaces. Exp Fluids 45(4):557–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0481-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (2010) On properties of fluid turbulence along streamlines. J Fluid Mech 648:183–203

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weber PT, Walrath DE (2017) Modeling noisy resonant system response. Mech Syst Signal Process 84:615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi HD, Xia KQ (2008) Flow mode transitions in turbulent thermal convection. Phys Fluids 20(5):055104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2920444

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang N, Huang Y, Hou D, Liu S, Ye D, Dong B, Fan Y (2019) Adaptive nonparametric kernel density estimation approach for joint probability density function modeling of multiple wind farms. Energies 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071356. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/7/1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman N, Lior N (2006) Jet impingement heat transfer: physics, correlations, and numerical modeling. Adv Heat Transf 39:565–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the China Scholarship Council for Dianfang Bi’s financial support (Scholarship no: 201806120081).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dianfang Bi.

Ethics declarations

Data access statement

All underlying data are described and provided in full within this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: generating of synthetic flapping jets

Appendix: generating of synthetic flapping jets

Given a PIV recording of \(n_x\times n_y\) pixels\(^2\), the jet origin is positioned at \(\left( 1,\frac{n_y}{2}\right)\). The jet centerline is assumed to follow a parabolic trajectory \(y_c=ax_c^2+bx_c+c\). Imposing the centerline to be located at \(y_c=y_p\) for \(x_c=n_x\), with a horizontal tangent at the origin, the coefficients are given by \(a=\frac{y_p-\frac{n_y}{2}}{\left( n_x-1\right) ^2}\), \(b=-2a\), and \(c=a+\frac{n_y}{2}\). The arc length \(s(x_c)\) along the centerline can be calculated as \(s(x_c)=\frac{1}{4a}\left( f(2ax_c+b)-f(b)\right)\) where \(f(t)=t\sqrt{1+t^2}+\mathrm{log}\left( t+\sqrt{1+t^2}\right)\). The displacement along the centerline is prescribed as \(V_c(x_c)=8\left( 1+s(x_c)\right) ^{-0.5}\), i.e., a maximum displacement of 8 pixels in the origin is imposed. As the jet will spread out, the jet width is defined as \(\sigma (x_c)=\sigma _0\left( 1+\frac{5s(x_c)}{n_x}\right)\) with \(\sigma _0=10 pixels\). For any pixel location \((x_o,y_o)\), the normal distance, \(\eta\), to the jet centerline can be determined. Denoting the intersection point of the line, normal to the centerline and passing through \((x_o,y_o)\), and the centerline by \((x_i,y_i)\), the local, total velocity can be calculated as \(V_{tot}(x_o,y_o)=V_c(x_i)\exp \left( -\eta ^2/2\sigma ^2(x_i)\right)\). Local velocity components are then obtained as \(U(x_o,y_o)=V_{tot}(x_o,y_o) \mathrm{cos}(\theta )\) and \(V(x_o,y_o)=V_{tot}(x_o,y_o)\alpha \mathrm{sin}(\theta )\) with \(\mathrm{cos}(\theta )=\left( 1+(2ax_i+b)^2\right) ^{-0.5}\) and \(\alpha =\frac{2ax_i+b}{|2ax_i+b|}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, D., Theunissen, R., Mendez, M.A. et al. Probabilistic evaluation of streamline topologies for the detection of preferential flow configurations in PIV applications. Exp Fluids 61, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2852-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2852-9

Navigation