Effect of vane sweep angle on vortex generator wake


The effect of varying the vane sweep angle of different vortex generators (VGs) on the statistics of the wake flow and the coherent structures was investigated. Pairs of rectangular, trapezoid, and delta vanes with sweep angle varying in ascending order were arranged at an equal but opposite angle with respect to the flow. A single rectangular vane was also investigated to identify the effect of vane pairing. The VGs were installed in the thin laminar boundary layer of a flat plate at Reynolds number of 930, based on VG height and free-stream velocity. Time-resolved tomographic particle image velocimetry (tomo-PIV) was carried out in a volume covering the wake, and stereo-PIV was applied to two cross-flow planes of the wake. The measurements showed two counter-rotating streamwise vortices, which induce a strong upward motion along the centerline of the wake. A pair of secondary counter-rotating streamwise vortices were also observed. The single rectangular vane showed a primary streamwise vortex and a weaker secondary streamwise vortex with opposite rotation. The evaluation of wall-normal momentum transport along the wake centerline showed that the paired configuration enhanced flow mixing. The investigation of the instantaneous coherent structures and proper-orthogonal-decomposition of the three-dimensional velocity fluctuations indicated that the coherence and strength of the vortices were inversely proportional to the sweep angle of the VG. The delta vane VG, with the largest sweep angle, produced more small-scale turbulence while the rectangular VG, with an upswept vane, produced the most coherent streamwise vortices. The investigation of wall-normal momentum transport showed that the rectangular VG had the best performance in improving flow mixing, followed by the trapezoidal, single rectangular, and delta VG. When evaluating the performance of VG using the ratio of mixing enhancement over drag, the trapezoidal VG was the most efficient one. The investigation confirmed the possibility of lowering the device drag while maintaining the effectiveness of VG using an optimum sweep angle. The performance of delta VG was about 60% of the trapezoidal VG, which suggests a large sweep angle can adversely affect the VG performance.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15


c :

Vortex generator chord (mm)

h :

Vortex generator height (mm)

f :

Focal length of camera lens

u :

Streamwise fluctuating velocity (m/s)

v :

Wall-normal fluctuating velocity (m/s)

x :

Streamwise direction

y :

Wall-normal direction

z :

Spanwise direction

C D :

Coefficient of drag

P :

Turbulence production (m2/s3)

Q :

Q-criterion (s−2)

U :

Instantaneous streamwise velocity (m/s)

U :

Free-stream velocity (m/s)

V :

Instantaneous wall-normal velocity (m/s)

W :

Instantaneous spanwise velocity (m/s)

β :

Incidence angle of the vane (°)

γ :

Leading-edge sweep angle (°)

δ :

Boundary layer thickness (mm)

\({\omega _x}\) :

Streamwise vorticity fluctuation (s−1)

\({\omega _z}\) :

Spanwise vorticity fluctuation (s−1)

\({\Omega _x}\) :

Streamwise mean vorticity (s−1)


  1. Betterton J, Hackett K, Ashill P, Wilson M, Woodcock I (2000) Laser doppler anemometry investigation on sub boundary layer vortex generators for flow control. In: 10th International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, pp 10–13

  2. Bohl DG, Koochesfahani MM (2009) MTV measurements of the vortical field in the wake of an airfoil oscillating at high reduced frequency. J Fluid Mech 620:63–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elsinga GE, Scarano F, Wieneke B, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41(6):933–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forster KJ, White TR (2014) Numerical investigation into vortex generators on heavily cambered wings. AIAA J 52(5):1059–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Godard G, Stanislas M (2006) Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerosp Sci Technol 10(3):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes AE, Hickey PK, Murphy WR, Hilton DA (1987) The application of sub-boundary layer vortex generators to reduce canopy Mach rumble interior noise on the Gulf-stream III. In: AIAA 25th aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, NL, January 12–15

  7. Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P (1998) Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for Turbulence, research report CTR-S88, pp 193–208

  8. Ku HH (1966) Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas. J Res Natl Bur Stand 70(4):263–273

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuethe AM (1972) Effect of streamwise vortices on wake properties associated with sound generation. J Aircr 9(10):715–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin JC (1999) Control of turbulent boundary-layer separation using micro-vortex generators. In: 30th fluid dynamics conference, AIAA 99-3404

  11. Lin JC, Howard FG, Selby GV (1990) Investigation of several passive and active methods for turbulent flow separation control. In: 21st fluid dynamics, plasma dynamics and lasers conference

  12. Lin JC, Howard FG, Selby GV (1991) Exploratory study of vortex-generating devices for turbulent flow separation control. In: 29th aerospace sciences meeting, January

  13. Lin JC, Robinson SK, McGhee RJ, Valarezo WO (1994) Separation control on high-lift airfoils via micro-vortex generators. J Aircr 31(6):1317–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lumley JL (1967) The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Atmos Turbul Radio Wave Propag 166–178

  15. Pauley WR, Eaton JK (1994) The effect of embedded longitudinal vortex arrays on turbulent boundary layer heat transfer. J Heat Transf 116(4):871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prasad AK, Adrian RJ (1993) Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry applied to liquid flows. Exp Fluids 15(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raffel M, Willert CE, Scarano F, Kähler CJ, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J (2018) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rao D, Kariya T (1988) Boundary-layer submerged vortex generators for separation control—an exploratory study. In: 1st national fluid dynamics conference, Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  19. Scarano F, Poelma C (2009) Three-dimensional vorticity patterns of cylinder wakes. Exp Fluids 47(1):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schubauer GB, Spangenberg WG (1960) Forced mixing in boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 8(1):10–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures. Q Appl Math 45(3):561–571

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun Z (2015) Micro-vortex generators for boundary layer control: principles and applications. Int J Flow Control 7(1–2)

  23. Taylor HD (1947) The elimination of diffuser separation by vortex generators. United Aircraft Corporation, East Hartford, CT, Technical report no 4012: 3

  24. Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) Universal outlier detection for PIV data. Exp Fluids 39(6):1096–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wieneke B (2005) Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Exp Fluids 39(2):267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wieneke B (2008) Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 45(4):549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sina Ghaemi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 56171 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 65751 KB)

Supplementary material 3 (AVI 69963 KB)

Supplementary material 4 (AVI 48925 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Ghaemi, S. Effect of vane sweep angle on vortex generator wake. Exp Fluids 60, 24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2666-1

Download citation