Experiments in Fluids

, 59:180 | Cite as

Signatures of shear-layer unsteadiness in proper orthogonal decomposition

  • Joel L WeightmanEmail author
  • Omid Amili
  • Damon Honnery
  • Julio Soria
  • Daniel Edgington-Mitchell
Research Article


Proper orthogonal decomposition can be used to determine the dominant coherent structures present within a turbulent flow. In many flows, these structures are well represented by only a few high-energy modes. However, additional modes with clear spatial structure, but low-energy contribution can often be present in the proper orthogonal decomposition analysis, even for flows with a high degree of periodicity. One such mode has been observed in both free and impinging jets determined from particle image velocimetry. Both experimental and synthetic data are used to investigate the role of this particular mode, linking its existence to the unsteadiness of shear-layer large-scale coherent structures.

Graphical abstract



This research was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP160102833). This research was undertaken with the assistance of resources provided at the NCI National Facility systems at the Australian National University through the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme supported by the Australian Government.


  1. Adrian RJ, Christensen KT, Liu ZC (2000) Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp Fluids 29(3):275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkislar MB, Krothapalli A, Lourenco LM (2003) Structure of a screeching rectangular jet: a stereoscopic particle image velocimetry study. J Fluid Mech 489:121–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL (1993) The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 25(1):539–575MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavalieri AVG, Rodríguez D, Jordan P, Colonius T, Gervais Y (2013) Wavepackets in the velocity field of turbulent jets. J Fluid Mech 730:559–592MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edgington-Mitchell D, Honnery DR, Soria J (2014a) The underexpanded jet mach disk and its associated shear layer. Phys Fluids 26(9):096–101 (1994-present)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edgington-Mitchell D, Oberleithner K, Honnery DR, Soria J (2014b) Coherent structure and sound production in the helical mode of a screeching axisymmetric jet. J Fluid Mech 748:822–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glauser MN, Leib SJ, George WK (1987) Coherent structures in the axisymmetric turbulent jet mixing layer. Turbul Shear Flows 5:134–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gudmundsson K, Colonius T (2011) Instability wave models for the near-field fluctuations of turbulent jets. J Fluid Mech 689:97–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurka R, Liberzon A, Hetsroni G (2006) Pod of vorticity fields: a method for spatial characterization of coherent structures. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 27(3):416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaunet V, Collin E, Delville J (2016) Pod-galerkin advection model for convective flow: application to a flapping rectangular supersonic jet. Exp Fluids 57(5):84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johansson PBV, George WK, Woodward SH (2002) Proper orthogonal decomposition of an axisymmetric turbulent wake behind a disk. Phys Fluids 14(7):2508–2514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kostas J, Soria J, Chong MS (2005) A comparison between snapshot pod analysis of piv velocity and vorticity data. Exp Fluids 38(2):146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar R, Wiley A, Venkatakrishnan L, Alvi F (2013) Role of coherent structures in supersonic impinging jets. Phys Fluids 25(7):076101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Z-C, Adrian RJ, Hanratty TJ (1994) Reynolds number similarity of orthogonal decomposition of the outer layer of turbulent wall flow. Phys Fluids 6(8):2815–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lumley JL (1967) The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In: Yaglom AM, Tatarski VI (eds) Atmospheric turbulence and wave propagation. Nauka, Moscow, pp 166–178Google Scholar
  17. Melling A (1997) Tracer particles and seeding for particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8(12):1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer KE, Pedersen JM, Özcan O (2007) A turbulent jet in crossflow analysed with proper orthogonal decomposition. J Fluid Mech 583:199–227MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell DM, Honnery DR, Soria J (2013) Near-field structure of underexpanded elliptic jets. Exp Fluids 54(7):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oberleithner K, Sieber M, Nayeri CN, Paschereit CO, Petz C, Hege HC, Noack BR, Wygnanski I (2011) Three-dimensional coherent structures in a swirling jet undergoing vortex breakdown: stability analysis and empirical mode construction. J Fluid Mech 679:383–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Podvin Bérengère, Fraigneau Yann (2017) A few thoughts on proper orthogonal decomposition in turbulence. Phys Fluids 29(2):020709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Powell A (1953) On edge tones and associated phenomena. Acta Acust United Acust 3(4):233–243Google Scholar
  23. Robinson Stephen K (1991) Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 23(1):601–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shariff K, Manning TA (2013) A ray tracing study of shock leakage in a model supersonic jet. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 25(7):076103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Part i: coherent structures. Q Appl Math 45(3):561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soria J (1996) An investigation of the near wake of a circular cylinder using a video-based digital cross-correlation particle image velocimetry technique. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 12(2):221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stuart JT (1967) On finite amplitude oscillations in laminar mixing layers. J Fluid Mech 29(3):417–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tan DJ, Soria J, Honnery D, Edgington-Mitchell D (2017) Novel method for investigating broadband velocity fluctuations in axisymmetric screeching jets. AIAA J 55(7):2321–2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang SL, Antonia RA, Djenidi L, Abe H, Zhou T, Danaila L, Zhou Y (2015) Transport equation for the mean turbulent energy dissipation rate on the centreline of a fully developed channel flow. J Fluid Mech 777:151–177MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tinney CE, Glauser MN, Ukeiley LS (2008) Low-dimensional characteristics of a transonic jet. Part 1. Proper orthogonal decomposition. J Fluid Mech 612:107–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weightman JL, Amili O, Honnery D, Edgington-Mitchell DM, Soria J (2017b) On the effects of nozzle lip thickness on the azimuthal modeselection of a supersonic impinging flow. In: 23rd AIAA/CEASAeroacoustics conference, p 3031Google Scholar
  32. Weightman JL, Amili O, Honnery D, Soria J, Edgington-Mitchell D (2016) Supersonic jet impingement on a cylindrical surface. In: 22nd AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, p 2800Google Scholar
  33. Weightman JL, Amili O, Honnery D, Soria J, Edgington-Mitchell D (2017a) An explanation for the phase lag in supersonic jet impingement. J Fluid Mech. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Turbulence Research in Aerospace and Combustion, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations