Experiments in Fluids

, 59:28 | Cite as

Force-motion phase relations and aerodynamic performance of a plunging plate

Research Article

Abstract

Due to the unsteady motion of a plunging plate, forces acting on the body experience a phase difference with respect to the motion. These phase relations are investigated experimentally for a harmonically plunging plate within an amplitude range of \(0.05\le {a/c}\le 0.6\), reduced frequency range of \(0.78<{k}<7.06\), and at a constant Reynolds number of 10,000. Both streamwise and cross-stream force components are found to have a phase lag following the motion; however, their variations are different. The phase lag of the force on the cross-stream direction increases as the amplitude increases. Drag–thrust transition has an influence on the streamwise force phase lags, which starts to increase when the thrust starts to be produced. Particle image velocimetry measurements are also performed to reveal the relations between vortex structures and force measurements. Leading edge vortex shedding characteristics are observed to be changing from drag occurring cases to thrust producing cases in parallel with the increment in phase lags.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) Grant 112M682.

References

  1. Anderson J, Streitlien K, Barrett D, Triantafyllou M (1998) Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency. J Fluid Mech 360:41–72MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Betz A (1912) Ein beitrag zur erklaerung des segelfluges. Zeitschrift fur Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt 3(1):269–272Google Scholar
  3. Bohl DG, Koochesfahani MM (2009) Mtv measurements of the vortical field in the wake of an airfoil oscillating at high reduced frequency. J Fluid Mech 620:63–88CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleaver DJ, Wang Z, Gursul I, Visbal M (2011) Lift enhancement by means of small-amplitude airfoil oscillations at low reynolds numbers. AIAA J 49(9):2018–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garrick I (1937) Propulsion of a flapping and oscillating airfoil. NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics), Technical Report No. 567Google Scholar
  6. Gulcat U (2016) Fundamentals of modern unsteady aerodynamics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Heathcote S, Gursul I (2007) Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low reynolds numbers. AIAA J 45(5):1066–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones KD, Dohring CM, Platzer MF (1996) Wake structures behind plunging airfoils: a comparison of numerical and experimental results. In: 34th Aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, Nevada, AIAA Paper No. 96-0078Google Scholar
  9. Knoller R (1909) Die Gesetze des Luftwiderstandes. Flug-und Motortechnik (Wien) 3(21):1–7Google Scholar
  10. Koochesfahani MM (1989) Vortical patterns in the wake of an oscillating airfoil. AIAA J 27(9):1200–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leishman GJ (2006) Principles of helicopter aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Molina J, Zhang X (2011) Aerodynamics of a heaving airfoil in ground effect. AIAA J 49(6):1168–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Monnier B, Naguib A, Koochesfahani M (2015) Influence of structural flexibility on the wake vortex pattern of airfoils undergoing harmonic pitch oscillation. Exp Fluids 56(4):80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moryossef Y, Levy Y (2004) Effect of oscillations on airfoils in close proximity to the ground. AIAA J 42(9):1755–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ol MV, Bernal L, Kang CK, Shyy W (2009) Shallow and deep dynamic stall for flapping low reynolds number airfoils. Exp Fluids 46(5):883–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rival D, Prangemeier T, Tropea C (2009) The influence of airfoil kinematics on the formation of leading-edge vortices in bio-inspired flight. Exp Fluids 46(5):823–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Son O, Cetiner O (2016) Effect of chordwise flexibility on flapping wing aerodynamics. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Jets, Wakes and Separated Flows (ICJWSF2015), Springer, New York, pp 203–210Google Scholar
  18. Theodorsen T (1935) General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics), Technical Report No. 496Google Scholar
  19. Triantafyllou G, Triantafyllou M, Grosenbaugh M (1993) Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion. J Fluids Struct 7(2):205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Triantafyllou M, Triantafyllou G, Gopalkrishnan R (1991) Wake mechanics for thrust generation in oscillating foils. Phys Fluids A 3(12):2835–2837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. von Kármán T, Burgers JM (1935) General aerodynamic theory—perfect fluids. In: Durand WF (ed) Aerodynamic theory, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Astronautical EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations