Abstract
In recent years, the detection of individual particle images and their tracking over time to determine the local flow velocity has become quite popular for planar and volumetric measurements. Particle tracking velocimetry has strong advantages compared to the statistical analysis of an ensemble of particle images by means of cross-correlation approaches, such as particle image velocimetry. Tracking individual particles does not suffer from spatial averaging and therefore bias errors can be avoided. Furthermore, the spatial resolution can be increased up to the sub-pixel level for mean fields. A maximization of the spatial resolution for instantaneous measurements requires high seeding concentrations. However, it is still challenging to track particles at high seeding concentrations, if no time series is available. Tracking methods used under these conditions are typically very complex iterative algorithms, which require expert knowledge due to the large number of adjustable parameters. To overcome these drawbacks, a new non-iterative tracking approach is introduced in this letter, which automatically analyzes the motion of the neighboring particles without requiring to specify any parameters, except for the displacement limits. This makes the algorithm very user friendly and also offers unexperienced users to use and implement particle tracking. In addition, the algorithm enables measurements of high speed flows using standard double-pulse equipment and estimates the flow velocity reliably even at large particle image densities.
References
Cierpka C, Lütke B, Kähler CJ (2013) Higher order multi-frame particle tracking velocimetry. Exp Fluids 54(5):1533
Elsinga GE, Westerweel J, Scarano F, Novara M (2011) On the velocity of ghost particles and the bias errors in tomographic-PIV. Exp Fluids 50(4):825–838
Fuchs T, Hain R, Kähler CJ (2016) Double-frame 3D-PTV using a tomographic predictor. Exp Fluids 57(11):174
Kähler CJ, Scharnowski S, Cierpka C (2012a) On the resolution limit of digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 52(6):1629–1639
Kähler CJ, Scharnowski S, Cierpka C (2012b) On the uncertainty of digital PIV and PTV near walls. Exp Fluids 52(6):1641–1656
Kähler CJ, Astarita T, Vlachos PP, Sakakibara J, Hain R, Discetti S, La Foy R, Cierpka C (2016a) Main results of the 4th International PIV Challenge. Exp Fluids 57(6):97
Kähler CJ, Scharnowski S, Cierpka C (2016b) Highly resolved experimental results of the separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. J Fluid Mech 796:257–284
Mikheev AV, Zubtsov VM (2008) Enhanced particle-tracking velocimetry (EPTV) with a combined two-component pair-matching algorithm. Meas Sci Technol 19(8):085401
Novara M, Schanz D, Reuther N, Kähler CJ, Schröder A (2016) Lagrangian 3D particle tracking in high-speed flows: Shake-The-Box for multi-pulse systems. Exp Fluids 57(8):128
Ohmi K, Li HY (2000) Particle-tracking velocimetry with new algorithms. Meas Sci Technol 11(6):603–616
Okamoto K, Nishio S, Saga T, Kobayashi T (2000) Standard images for particle-image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 11(6):685–691
Schanz D, Gesemann S, Schröder A (2016) Shake-The-Box: Lagrangian particle tracking at high particle image densities. Exp Fluids 57(5):70
Acknowledgements
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through Grant no. KA 1808/8-2 is gratefully acknowledged by the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuchs, T., Hain, R. & Kähler, C.J. Non-iterative double-frame 2D/3D particle tracking velocimetry. Exp Fluids 58, 119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2404-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2404-0