Abstract
This study numerically and experimentally examines the resulting flow field of a shock wave passing through a pipe gap. The effects of gap geometry and shock Mach number variation are investigated. Incident shock Mach numbers of 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 and gap widths of 25 and 50 mm were used, which correspond to 0.5 and 1.0 pipe inner diameters, respectively. For both cases, the incident shock wave propagated into the downstream pipe at much reduced strength. A strong expansion propagated into the upstream pipe causing a significant pressure drop from the initial post-shock pressure. Expansion waves at the outflow resulted in supersonic speeds as the flow entered the gap for Mach 1.4 and 1.5. A notable feature was the formation of a standing shock at the inlet to the downstream pipe for the higher two Mach numbers in both cases. Decreasing the gap width moved the standing shock closer to the downstream pipe. For the lowest Mach number of 1.3, no standing shock system was set up. The propagation conditions in the downstream pipe showed that the pressure is initially unsteady, but becomes more uniform, controlled by the developed wave system in the gap. For the flanged gap case, the flow within the gap is confined for much longer and hence produces more intense and complex flow feature interactions and an earlier transition to turbulence. The induced shock strength in the downstream pipe is independent of gap geometry and separation distance examined in this paper as verified by experimental pressure traces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe A, Takayama K (1990) Numerical simulation and density measurement of a shock wave discharged from the open end of a shock tube. Jpn Soc Mech Eng Int J 33:216
Brouillette M, Hébert C (1997) Propagation and interaction of shock-generated vortices. Fluid Dyn Res 21:159–169
Endo M, Iwamoto J (2005) A study on shock wave formed in unsteady jet through vortex ring. Jpn Soc Mech Eng Int J 71:2928–2933
Kim H, Kweon Y, Setoguchi T, Aoki T (2003) Weak shock reflection from an open end of a tube with a baffle plate. J Mech Sci Technol 17:718–725
Kleine H, Le C, Takehara K, Etoh T (2010) Time-resolved visualization of shock-vortex systems emitted from an open shock tube. J Vis 13:33–40
Minota T (1993) Interaction of a shock wave with a high-speed vortex ring. Fluid Dyn Res 12:335–342
Skews B, Platt D, Paton R (2014) Compressible flow through a ruptured pipe. 16th International Symposium on Flow Visualization. June 24–28, Okinawa, Japan, pp 151–162
Strutt J, Rayleigh Y (1878) On the stability of jets. Proceedings of the London Mathematical society, London 10:4–13
Weiss A, Olivier H (2014) Shock boundary layer interaction under the influence of a normal suction slot. Shock Waves 24:11–19
Zhang S, Zhang Y, Chi-Wang S (2005) Multistage interaction of a shock wave and a strong vortex. Phys Fluids 17:116101
Acknowledgements
The support of the South African National Research Foundation, Grants 75249 and 80816, is much appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, R., Kapfudzaruwa, S., Skews, B. et al. Shock wave propagation past a gap in a pipeline. Exp Fluids 58, 93 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2372-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2372-4