Abstract
Data assimilation can be used to combine experimental and numerical realizations of the same flow to produce hybrid flow fields. These have the advantages of less noise contamination and higher resolution while simultaneously reproducing the main physical features of the measured flow. This study investigates data assimilation of the mean flow around an idealized airfoil (Re = 13,500) obtained from time-averaged two-dimensional particle image velocimetry (PIV) data. The experimental data, which constitute a low-dimensional representation of the full flow field due to resolution and field-of-view limitations, are incorporated into a simulation governed by the two-dimensional, incompressible Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with an unknown momentum forcing. This forcing, which corresponds to the divergence of the Reynolds stress tensor, is calculated from a direct-adjoint optimization procedure to match the experimental and numerical mean velocity fields. The simulation is projected onto the low-dimensional subspace of the experiment to calculate the discrepancy and a smoothing procedure is used to recover adjoint solutions on the higher dimensional subspace of the simulation. The study quantifies how well data assimilation can reconstruct the mean flow and the minimum experimental measurements needed by altering the resolution and domain size of the time-averaged PIV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian RJ (1991) Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:261–304
Adrian RJ, Westerweel J (2011) Particle image velocimetry. Cambridge University, New York
Bewley TR, Moin P, Temam R (2001) DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. J Fluid Mech 447:179–225
Bukshtynov V, Volkov O, Protas B (2011) On optimal reconstruction of constitutive relations. Physica D 240(16):1228–1244
Flemming J (2011) Generalized Tikhonov regularization: Basic theory and comprehensive results on convergence rates. PhD thesis, Techn Univ Chemnitz
Foures DPG, Dovetta N, Sipp D, Schmid PJ (2014) A data-assimilation method for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes-driven mean flow reconstruction. J Fluid Mech 759:404–431
Gharib M (1983) The effect of flow oscillations on cavity drag, and a technique for their control. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology
Giannetti F, Luchini P (2007) Structural sensitivity analysis of the first instability of the cylinder wake. J Fluid Mech 581:167–197
Gonzalez C, Bruhat JF, Wainfan B, McKeon BJ (2010) Control of laminar separation on an idealized airfoil using periodic dynamic roughness actuation. In 63rd Meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Fluid Dynamics. Gallery of Fluid Motion, Poster 26
Gronskis A, Heitz D, Mémin E (2013) Inflow and initial conditions for direct numerical simulation based on adjoint data assimilation. J Comput Phys 242:480–497
Kim J, Bewley TR (2007) A linear systems approach to flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:383–417
Kompenhans J, Raffel M, Willert C (2007) Particle image velocimetry—a pratical guide. Springer, Berlin
Lewis JM, Lakshmivarahan S, Dhall S (2006) Dynamic data assimilation: a least squares approach. In: Encyclopedia of mathematics and its application 104, vol 13. Cambridge University Press
Marquet O, Sipp D, Jacquin L (2008) Sensitivity analysis and passive control of cylinder flow. J Fluid Mech 516:221–252
Meliga P, Pujals G, Serre E (2012) Sensitivity of 2-D turbulent flow past a D-shaped cylinder using global stability. Phys Fluids 24(6):61701
Mettot C, Sipp D (2014) Quasi-laminar stability and sensitivity analyses for turbulent flows: Prediction of low-frequency unsteadiness and passive control. Phys Fluids 26(4):45112
Mons V, Chassaing JC, Gomez T, Sagaut P (2016) Reconstruction of unsteady viscous flows using data assimilation schemes. J Comput Phys 316:255–280
Nisugi K, Hayase T, Shirai A (2004) Fundamental study of hybrid wind tunnel integrating numerical simulation and experiment in analysis of flow field. JSME Int J 47:593–604
Polak E, Ribière G (1969) Note sur la convergence de méthodes de directions conjuguées. Revue française d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelle, série rouge 3(1):35–43
Prasad A, Williamson CHK (1997) The instability of the shear layer separating from a bluff body. J Fluid Mech 333:375–402
Sciacchitano A, Wieneke B (2016) PIV uncertainty propagation. Meas Sci Technol 27(8):1–16
Sipp D, Marquet O, Meliga P, Barbagallo A (2010) Dynamics and control of global instabilities in open-flows: a linearized approach. Appl Mech Rev 63(3):030801
Strykowski P, Sreenivasan K (1990) On the formation and suppression of vortex ‘shedding’ at low Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech 218:71–107
Suzuki T (2012) Reduced-order Kalman-filtered hybrid simulation combining particle tracking velocimetry and direct numerical simulation. J Fluid Mech 709:249–288
Suzuki T, Ji H, Yamamoto F (2009a) Unsteady PTV velocity field past an airfoil solved with DNS: Part 1. Algorithm of hybrid simulation and hybrid velocity field at \({R}e \approx 10^3\). Exp Fluids 47:957–976
Suzuki T, Sanse A, Mizushima T, Yamamoto F (2009b) Unsteady PTV velocity field past an airfoil solved with DNS: Part 2. Validation and application at Reynolds numbers up to \({R}e \le 10^4\). Exp Fluids 47:977–994
Wallace RD, McKeon BJ (2012) Laminar separation bubble manipulation with dynamic roughness. In: Proceedings of the 6th AIAA flow control conference. AIAA 2012–2680
Westerweel J (2008) On velocity gradients in PIV interrogation. Exp Fluids 44:831–842
Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) Universal outlier detection for PIV data. Exp Fluids 39(6):1096–1100
Wieneke B (2015) PIV uncertainty quantification from correlation statistics. Meas Sci Technol 26(7):1–10
Wilson BM, Smith BL (2013) Uncertainty on PIV mean and fluctuating velocity due to bias and random errors. Meas Sci Technol 24(3):1–15
Zielinska BJA, Goujon-Durand S, Dusek J, Wesfried JE (1997) Strongly nonlinear effect in unstable wakes. Phys Rev Lett 79:3893–3896
Acknowledgements
Support from a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship (S.S.) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Professors Tim Colonius and Anthony Leonard for discussions about the direct-adjoint optimization framework as well as Kevin Rosenberg for his assistance in implementing the optimization procedure on a cluster. Finally, the authors wish to thank the referees for their suggestions which improved the clarity of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Symon, S., Dovetta, N., McKeon, B.J. et al. Data assimilation of mean velocity from 2D PIV measurements of flow over an idealized airfoil. Exp Fluids 58, 61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2336-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2336-8