Experiments in Fluids

, 58:22 | Cite as

Flow around a semicircular cylinder with passive flow control mechanisms

Research Article

Abstract

Wind tunnel experiments were performed to study the effect of passive flow control strategies on the wake and drag of a semicircular cylinder of infinite aspect ratio. High-resolution planar particle image velocimetry was used to obtain flow statistics around the semicircular cylinder at Reynolds number \(Re\approx 3.2\times 10^4\) based on the cylinder diameter. The control mechanisms under consideration include rigid flaps of various lengths placed at the edges of the structure and a small slot along the symmetry plane of the cylinder. Mean velocity fields reveal the distinctive effects of each passive mechanism on the flow, such as velocity recovery, size of the recirculation bubble and location of the reattachment point. The distributions of turbulence kinetic energy and kinematic shear stress show the modulation of each passive control mechanism on the wake, including the onset and location of the maximum turbulence levels. Instantaneous and mean fields of swirling strength further highlight the role of the passive mechanisms in the vortex dynamics. Drag coefficient for the various cases was estimated indirectly from the flow measurements using a momentum balance. This approach shows that long flaps and slot were able to reduce drag with respect to the base case. The rigid flaps with length coincident with the diameter of the cylinder offered the best performance with drag reduction of \(\sim\)25\(\%\).

References

  1. Adrian RJ, Meinhart CD, Tomkins CD (2000) Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 422:1–54MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian RJ, Christensen KT, Liu ZC (2000) Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp Fluids 29:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonia RA, Rajagopalan S (1990) Determination of drag of a circular cylinder. AIAA J 28(10):1833–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baek H, Karniadakis GE (2009) Suppressing vortex-induced vibrations via passive means. J Fluid Struct 25:848–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen WL, Gao DL, Yuan WY, Li H, Hu H (2015) Passive jet control of flow around a circular cylinder. Exp Fluids 56(11):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen WL, Wang X, Xu F, Li H, Hu H (2016) Passive jet flow control method for suppressing unsteady vortex shedding from a circular cylinder. J Aerospace Eng 30(1):04016063. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000661
  7. Chen W-L, Xin DB, Xu F, Li H, Ou J-P, Hu H (2013) Suppression of vortex-induced vibration of a circular cylinder using suction-based flow control. J Fluid Struct 42:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi H, Jeon W-P, Kim J (2008) Control of flow over a bluff body. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:113–139MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Farhadi M, Sedighi K, Fattahi E (2010) Effect of a splitter plate on flow over a semi-circular cylinder. Proc IME G J Aeros Eng 224(3):321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schlichting H (1979) Boundary layer theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Hucho WH, Sovran G (1993) Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25(1):485–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hwang J-Y, Yang K-S (2007) Drag reduction on a circular cylinder using dual detached splitter plates. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:551–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koike M, Nagayoshi T, Hamamoto N (2004) Research on aerodynamic drag reduction by vortex generators. Mitshubishi Motors Tech Rev. 2004Google Scholar
  14. Kunze S, Brucker C (2012) Control of vortex shedding on a circular cylinder using self-adaptive hairy-flaps. C R Mec 340(1):41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lien FS, Yee E, Cheng Y (2004) Simulation of mean flow and turbulence over a 2d building array using high-resolution cfd and a distributed drag force approach. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 92(2):117–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin J-C, Towfighi J, Rockwell D (1995) Instantaneous structure of the near-wake of a circular cylinder: on the effect of reynolds number. J Fluid Struct 9(4):409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin N, Letchford C, Tamura Y, Liang B, Nakamura O (2005) Characteristics of wind forces acting on tall buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 93(3):217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mimeau C, Mortazavi I, Cottet GH (2014) Passive flow control around a semi-circular cylinder using porous coatings. Int J Flow Contr 6(1):43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi X-D, Feng L-H (2015) Control of flow around a circular cylinder by bleed near the separation points. Exp Fluids 56:214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sirenko V, Pavlovsky R, Rohatgi US (2012) Methods of reducing vehicle aerodynamic drag. ASME 2012 Summer Heat Transfer Conf.Google Scholar
  21. Williamson CHK, Govardhan R (2004) Vortex-induced vibrations. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:413–455MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu Y, Christensen KT (2006) Population trends of spanwise vortices in wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 568(1):55–76CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Yajima Y, Sano O (1996) A note on the drag reduction of a circular cylinder due to double rows of holes. Fluid Dynam Res 18(4):237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S, Kendall TM (1999) Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J Fluid Mech 387:353–396MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Hamed
    • 1
  • J. Vega
    • 1
  • B. Liu
    • 2
  • L. P. Chamorro
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Civil and Environ EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations