Experiments in Fluids

, 55:1727 | Cite as

The potential of on-line optical flow measurement in the control and monitoring of pilot-scale oxy-coal flames

  • Pal Toth
  • Zhonghua Zhan
  • Zhisong Fu
  • Arpad B. Palotas
  • Eric G. Eddings
  • Terry A. Ring
Research Article

Abstract

Digital image processing techniques offer a wide array of tools capable of extracting apparent displacement or velocity information from sequences of images of moving objects. Optical flow algorithms have been widely used in areas such as traffic monitoring and surveillance. The knowledge of instantaneous apparent flame velocities (however, they are defined) may prove to be valuable during the operation and control of industrial-scale burners. Optical diagnostics techniques, coupled with on-line image processing, have been applied in the optimization of coal-fired power plants; however, regardless of the available technology, the current methods do not apply optical flow measurement. Some optical flow algorithms have the potential of real-time applicability and are thus possible candidates for on-line apparent flame velocity extraction. In this paper, the potential of optical flow measurement in on-line flame monitoring and control is explored.

References

  1. Arik EB, Carr J (1997) Digital particle image velocimetry system for real-time wind tunnel measurements. In: International congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities, pp 267–277Google Scholar
  2. Baeg SY, Kim SM, Cho CH (2005) Development of flame monitoring system with optical receiver for pulverized coal firing boilers. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6041, ICMIT 2005: information systems and signal processing, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  3. Baek WB, Lee SJ, Baeg SY, Cho CH (2001) Flame image processing and analysis for optimal coal firing of thermal power plant. Proc Int Symp Ind Electron 2:928–931Google Scholar
  4. Baldini G, Campadelli P, Lanzarotti R (2000) Combustion analysis by image processing of premixed flames. Proc Int Conf Image Process 2:708–711Google Scholar
  5. Beauchemin SS, Barron JL (1995) The computation of optical flow. ACM Comput Surv 27(3):433–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouguet JY (2000) Pyramidal implementation of the Lucas Kanade feature tracker—description of the algorithm. Intel Corporation, Tech. rep.Google Scholar
  7. Brox T, Bruhn A, Papenberg N, Weickert J (2004) High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping. In: Proceedings of the eighth European conference on computer vision, pp 25–36Google Scholar
  8. Buhre BJP, Elliott LK, Sheng CD, Gupta RP, Wall TF (2005) Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31(4):283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74(368):829–836CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Deriche R, Kornprobst P, Aubert G (1995) Optical-flow estimation while preserving its dis-continuities: a variational approach. In: Proceedings of the second Asian conference on computer vision vol 2, pp 290–295Google Scholar
  11. Farneback G (2001) Very high accuracy velocity estimation using orientation tensors, parametric motion, and simultaneous segmentation of the motion field. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on computer vision vol 1, pp 171–177Google Scholar
  12. Fielding J, Long MB (2000) Comparison of particle image velocimetry and optical flow velocimetry for turbulent flows and flames. In: Laser applications to chemical and environmental analysis–combustion diagnostics IIGoogle Scholar
  13. Fielding J, Long MB, Fielding G, Komiyama M (2001) Systematic errors in optical-flow velocimetry for turbulent flows and flames. Appl Opt 40(6):757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2001) Digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood ClifsGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez-Cencerrado A, Pena B, Gil A (2012) Coal flame characterization by means of digital image processing in a semi-industrial scale pf swirl burner. Appl Energy 94:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang ZW, Luo ZX, Zhou HC (2009) A simple measurement method of temperature and emissivity of coal-fired flames from visible radiation image and its application in a cfb boiler furnace. Fuel 88:980–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurihara N, Nishikawa M, Watanabe A, Satoh Y, Ohtsuka K, Miyagaki M, Highashi T, Masai T (1986) A combustion diagnosis method for pulverized coal boilers using flame-image recognition technology. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 1(2):99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lou C, Li WH, Zhou HC, Salinas CT (2011) Experimental investigation on simultaneous measurement of temperature distributions and radiative properties in an oil-fired tunnel furnace by radiation analysis. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:1–8CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu G, Yan Y, Colechin M (2004) A digital imaging based multifunctional flame monitoring system. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 53(4):1152–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu G, Gilabert G, Yan Y (2005) Vision based monitoring and characterisation of combustion flames. J Phys Conf Ser 15:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu G, Yan Y, Cornwell S, Whitehouse M, Riley G (2008) Impact of co-firing coal and biomass on flame characteristics and stability. Fuel 87:1133–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pizer SM, Amburn EP, Austin JD, Cromartie R, Geselowitz A, Greer T, Zimmerman JB, Zuiderveld K (1987) Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 39:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10(2):290–301CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberts JW (2012) Control of underactuated fluid-body systems with real-time particle image velocimetry. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  25. Scholz J, Wiersbinski T, Ruhnau P, Kondermann D, Garbe CS, Hain R, Beushausen V (2008) Double-pulse planar-lif investigations using fluorescence motion analysis for mixture formation investigation. Exp Fluids 45:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shimoda M, Sugano A, Kimura T, Watanabe Y, Ishiyama K (1990) Prediction method of unburnt carbon for coal fired utility boiler using image processing technique of combustion flame. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 5(4):640–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smart J, Lu G, Yan Y, Riley G (2010) Characterisation of an oxy-coal flame through digital imaging. Combust Flame 157:1132–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun D, Lu G, Zhou H, Yan Y (2011) Flame stability monitoring and characterization through digital imaging and spectral analysis. Meas Sci Technol 22:1–9Google Scholar
  29. Xiangyu Z, Qiang C, Chun L, Huaichun Z (2011) An improved colorimetric method for visualization of 2-d, inhomogeneous temperature distribution in a gas fired industrial furnace by radiation image processing. Proc Combust Inst 33:2755–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu C, Zhang J, Yang D, Zhou B, Tang G, Wang S (2009) Dense-phase pneumatically conveyed coal particle velocity measurement using electrostatic probes and cross correlation algorithm. J Phys Conf Ser 147:1–16. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/147/1/012004
  31. Zhang J, Okerlund R, Eddings EG, Wendt JOL (2007) Ignition of axial pulverized coal jets in a specially designed 100kw oxy-fuel combustor. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on coal combustion, pp 305–309Google Scholar
  32. Zhang J, Kelly KE, Eddings EG, Wendt JO (2011) Ignition in 40 kw co-axial turbulent diffusion oxy-coal jet flames. Proc Combust Inst 33:3375–3382CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pal Toth
    • 1
  • Zhonghua Zhan
    • 1
  • Zhisong Fu
    • 1
  • Arpad B. Palotas
    • 1
  • Eric G. Eddings
    • 1
  • Terry A. Ring
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations