Experiments in Fluids

, 54:1455 | Cite as

Fluidic oscillators for flow control

  • Surya Raghu
Review Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topics in Flow Control


Fluidic oscillators are based on the bi-stable states of a jet (or a pair of jets) of fluid inside a specially designed flow chamber. These produce sweeping or pulsing jets of high exit velocity (~sonic exit velocities) extending the control authority achievable to high subsonic flows. Sweeping and pulsing jets with frequencies ranging from 1 to 20 kHz have been obtained with meso-scale (nozzle sizes in the range of 200 μm–1 mm) fluidic oscillators with very low mass flow rates of the order of 1 g/s. Such actuators have been recently used in laboratory scale experiments for separation control and cavity noise control with significant promise to be implemented in full-scale systems. In this paper, we provide a historical background of fluidic oscillators and methods to produce either sweeping or pulsing jets, their typical frequency, flow rate, and scaling characteristics. Some challenges in detailed characterization of such actuators through measurement will be presented. We will also discuss some of the system integration issues of translating this technology into practice. This is followed by a brief discussion of the need for further development of such actuators and the understanding of the mechanism by which flow control is achieved by these sweeping jets.


Flow Control Exit Velocity Feedback Channel Active Flow Control Fluidic Oscillator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cattafesta L, Sheplak M (2011) Actuators for active flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43(1):247–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cerretelli C, Gharaibah E (2007) An experimental and numerical investigation on fluidic oscillators for flow control. In: AIAA-2007-3854, 37th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, 25–28 June 2007, Miami, FLGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerretelli C, Wuerz W, Gharaibah E (2010) Unsteady separation control on wind turbine blades using fluidic oscillators. AIAA J 48:1302–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crittenden TM, Raghu S (2008) Combustion powered actuator with integrated high frequency, oscillator. In: International conference on jets, wakes, and separated flows, ICJWSF-2008, 16–19 Sept 2008, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Culley DE (2006) Variable frequency diverter actuation for flow control. In :AIAA-2006-3034, 2006, 3rd AIAA flow control conference, 5–8 June 2006, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Culley DE, Bright MM, Prahst PS, Strazisar AJ (2004) Active flow separation control of a stator vane using embedded injection in a multistage compressor experiment. J Turbomach 126(1):24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Funaki J, Mizuno G, Kondo M, Hirata K (1999) Oscillation mechanism of a flip-flop jet nozzle based on the flow which flows through a connecting tube. Trans JSME (Ser B) 65(631):928–933 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gokoglu SA, Kuczmarski MA, Culley DE, Raghu S (2009) Numerical studies of a fluidic diverter for flow control. In: NASA/TM-2009-216088, December 2009, also published as AIAA-2009-4012 (AIAA FED summer meeting, San Antonio, TX)Google Scholar
  9. Gokoglu SA, Kuczmarski MA, Culley DE, Raghu S (2010) Numerical studies of a supersonic fluidic diverter actuator for flow control. In: 5th Flow control conference, 28 June–1 July 2010, Chicago, Illinois, AIAA 2010-4415Google Scholar
  10. Gregory JW, Sullivan JP, Raman G, Raghu S (2007a) Characterization of the microfluidics oscillator. AIAA J 45(3):568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregory JW, Ruotolo JC, Byerley AR, McLaughlin TE (2007b) Switching behavior of a plasma-fluidic actuator. In: AIAA-2007-785, 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NVGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregory JW, Gnanamanickam EP, Sullivan JP, Raghu S (2009) Variable-frequency fluidic oscillator driven by a piezoelectric bender. AIAA J 47(11):2717–2725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guyot D, Taticchi P, Borgia PTM, Paschereit CO, Raghu S (2008a) Active control of combustion instability using a fluidic actuator. In: AIAA 2008-1058, 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 7–10 Jan 2008, Reno, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  14. Guyot D, Bobusch B, Paschereit CO, Raghu S (2008b) Active combustion control using a fluidic oscillator for asymmetric fuel flow modulation. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, 21–23 July 2008, Hartford, Connecticut, AIAA 2008-4956Google Scholar
  15. Guyot D, Paschereit CO, Raghu S (2008c) A fluidic actuator for active combustion control, GT2008-50797. In: Proceedings of GT2008 ASME Turbo Expo 2007: power for land, sea and air, 9–13 June 2008, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirshner JM, Katz S (1975) Design theory of fluidic components. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Koso T, Kawaguchi S, Hojo M, Hayami H (2002) Flow mechanism of a self-induced oscillating jet issued from a flip-flop jet nozzle. In: The fifth JSME-KSME fluids engineering conference, 17–21 Nov 2002, Nagoya, JapanGoogle Scholar
  18. Phillips E, Woszidlo R, Wygnanski I (2010) Separation control on a dynamic trailing-edge flap. In: AIAA-2010-4246, AIAA 5th flow control conference, 28 June–1 July, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  19. Raghu S (2001) Feedback-free fluidic oscillator. US Patent 6,253,782Google Scholar
  20. Raghu S, Raman G (1999) Miniature fluidic devices for flow control. In: ASME FEDSM 99-7256, ASME-JSME joint fluids engineering conference, 18–23 July 1999, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. Raghu S, Gregory JW, Sullivan JP (2005) Modulated high frequency fluidic actuators for flow control. In: International conference on jets, wakes and separated flows, ICJWSF-2005, 5–8 Oct 2005, Toba-shi, Mie, JapanGoogle Scholar
  22. Raman G, Rice EJ, Cornelius D (1994) Evaluation of flip-flop jet nozzles for use as practical excitation devices. J Fluids Eng 116:508–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raman G, Raghu S, Bencic TJ (1999) Cavity resonance suppression using miniature fluidic oscillators. In: AIAA-99-1900, 5th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Seattle, WA, 10–12 May 1999Google Scholar
  24. Raman G, Packiarajan S, Papadopoulos G, Weissman C, Raghu S (2005) Jet thrust vectoring using a miniature fluidic oscillator. Aeronaut J R Aeronaut Soc 109(1093):129–138Google Scholar
  25. Seele R, Tewes P, Woszidlo R, McVeigh M, Lucas N, Wygnanski IJ (2009) Discrete sweeping jets as tools for improving the performance of the V-22. J Aircr 46(6):2098–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spyropoulos CE (1964) Sonic oscillator. In: Proceedings of the fluid amplification symposium, Harry Diamond Labs, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Tesar V (2007) Pressure-driven microfluidics. Artech House, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. Tewes P, Taubert L, Wygnanski IJ (2010) On the use of sweeping jets to augment the lift of a lambda-Wing. In: AIAA-2010-4689, AIAA 5th flow control conference, 28 June–1 July, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomac MN, Gregory JW (2012) Frequency studies and scaling effects of jet interaction in a feedback-free fluidic oscillator. In: AIAA-2012-1248, 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  30. Viets H (1975) Flip-flop jet nozzle. AIAA J 13(10):1375–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woszidlo R (2011) Parameters governing separation control with sweeping jet actuators. Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  32. Woszidlo R, Wygnanski IJ (2011) Parameters governing separation control with sweeping jet actuators. In: AIAA-2011-3172, AIAA fluid dynamics conference, Hawaii, June 2011Google Scholar
  33. Woszidlo R, Nawroth H, Raghu S, Wygnanski IJ (2010) Parametric study of sweeping jet actuators for separation control. In: AIAA 2010-4247, AIAA flow control conference, Chicago, June 2010Google Scholar
  34. Zimmerman WB, Hewakandamby BN, Tesař V, Bandulasena HCH, Omotowa OA (2009) On the design and simulation of an airlift loop bioreactor with microbubble generation by fluidic oscillation. Food Bioprod Process 87:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Fluidics LLCColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations