Skip to main content
Log in

On factors influencing arc filament plasma actuator performance in control of high speed jets

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Localized arc filament plasma actuators (LAFPAs) have been developed and used at The Gas Dynamics and Turbulence Laboratory for the purpose of controlling high-speed and high Reynolds number jets. The ability of LAFPAs for use in both subsonic and supersonic jets has been explored, and experiments to date have shown that these actuators have significant potential for mixing enhancement and noise control applications. While it has been established that the actuators manipulate instabilities of the jet, the exact nature of how the actuation couples to the flow is still unclear. All of the results previously reported have been based on a nozzle extension that has an azimuthal groove of 1 mm width and 0.5 mm depth along the inner surface approximately 1 mm upstream of nozzle extension exit. The ring groove was initially added to shield the plasma arcs from the high-momentum flow. However, the effect of the ring groove on the actuation mechanism is not known. To explore this effect, a new nozzle extension is designed, which relocates the actuators to the nozzle extension face and eliminates the ring groove. Schlieren images, particle image velocimetry and acoustic results of a Mach 0.9 jet of Reynolds number ~6.1 × 105 show similar trends and magnitudes with and without a ring groove. Thus, it is concluded that the ring groove does not play a primary role in the LAFPAs’ control mechanism. Furthermore, the effect of the duty cycle of the actuator input pulse on the LAFPAs’ control authority is investigated. The results show that the minimum duty cycle that provides complete plasma formation has the largest control over the jet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja KK, Blakney DF (1985) Tone excited jets, part IV: acoustic measurements. J Sound & Vib 102(1):93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja KK, Whipkey RR, Jones GS (1983) Control of turbulent boundary layer flows by sound. AIAA Paper 1983–0726

  • Arakeri VH, Krothapalli A, Siddavaram V, Alkislar MB, Lourenco LM (2003) On the use of microjets to suppress turbulence in a Mach 0.9 axisymmetric jet. J Fluid Mech 490:75–98

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GL, Roshko A (1974) On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J Fluid Mech 64(4):775–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callender B, Gutmark E, Martens S (2005) Far-field acoustic investigation into Chevron nozzle mechanisms and trends. AIAA J 43(1):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Wygnanski I (1987) The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. Part 1. The linear growth of disturbances near the nozzle. J Fluid Mech 176:191–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corke TC, Shakib F, Nagib HM (1991) Mode selection and resonant phase locking in unstable axisymmetric jets. J Fluid Mech 223:253–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaitonde DV (2009) Simulation of supersonic nozzle flows with plasma-based control. AIAA Paper 2009–4187

  • Gaitonde DV, Samimy M (2010) Effect of plasma-based azimuthal mode excitation on supersonic jet flow. AIAA Paper 2010–4416

  • Grosch CE, Seiner JM, Hussaini MY, Jackson TL (1997) Numerical simulation of mixing enhancement in a hot supersonic jet. Phys Fluids 9(4):1125–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeb N, Munday D, Gutmark E, Liu J, Kailasanath K (2010) Supersonic jet noise reduction by Chevrons enhanced with fluidic injection. AIAA Paper 2010–4847

  • Ho C-M, Huerre P (1984) Perturbed free shear layers. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 16:365–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jubelin B (1980) New Experimental studies on jet Noise amplification. AIAA Paper 1980–0961

  • Kearney-Fischer M, Samimy M (2010) Noise control of a high Reynolds number mach 1.3 heated jet using plasma actuators. AIAA Paper 2010–13

  • Kearney-Fischer M, Kim J-H, Samimy M (2009a) Control of a high Reynolds number Mach 0.9 heated jet using plasma actuators. Phys Fluids 21:095101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney-Fischer M, Kim J-H, Samimy M (2009b) Noise control of a high Reynolds number mach 0.9 heated jet using plasma actuators. AIAA Paper 2009–3188

  • Kearney-Fischer M, Kim J-H, Samimy M (2010) Flow control of a high Reynolds number mach 1.3 heated jet using plasma actuators. AIAA Paper 2010–4418

  • Kim J-H, Samimy M (1999) Mixing enhancement via nozzle trailing edge modifications in a high speed rectangular jet. Phys Fluids 11(9):2731–2742

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-H, Kastner J, Samimy M (2009a) Active control of a high Reynolds number mach 0.9 axisymmetric jet. AIAA J 47(1):116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-H, Kearney-Fischer M, Samimy M, Gogineni S (2009b) Active noise control in jets from conical and contoured supersonic nozzles with plasma actuators. AIAA Paper 2009–3187

  • Kim J-H, Nishihara M, Adamovich I, Samimy M, Gorbatov S, Pliavaka F (2010) Development of localized arc filament plasma actuators for high-speed and high Reynolds number flow control. Exp Fluids 49:497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurendeau E, Jordan P, Bonnet JP, Delville J, Parnaudeau P, Lamballais E (2008) Subsonic jet noise reduction by fluidic control: The interaction region and the global effect. Phys Fluids 20:101519-1–101519-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill MJ (1952) On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc Roy Soc London Ser A 211(1107):564–587

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu HY (1983) Effect of excitation on coaxial jet noise. AIAA J 21(2):214–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalke A (1965) On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer. J Fluid Mech 23(3):521–544

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moore CJ (1977) The role of shear-layer instability waves in jet exhaust noise. J Fluid Mech 80(2):321–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaschko P (1979) Helical instabilities of slowly divergent jets. J Fluid Mech 92(2):209–215

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saiyed NH, Mikkelsen KL, Bridges JE (2003) Acoustics and thrust of quiet separate-flow high-bypass-ratio nozzles. AIAA J 41(3):372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samimy M, Zaman KBMQ, Reeder MF (1993) Effect of tabs on the flow and noise field of an axisymmetric jet. AIAA J 31(4):609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samimy M, Adamovich I, Webb B, Kastner J, Hileman J, Keshav S, Palm P (2004) Development and characterization of plasma actuators for high-speed jet control. Exp Fluids 37(4):577–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samimy M, Kastner J, Kim J-H, Utkin Y, Adamovich I, Brown C (2006) Flow and noise control in high speed and high Reynolds number jets using plasma actuators. AIAA Paper 2006–2846

  • Samimy M, Kim J-H, Kastner J, Adamovich I (2007a) Noise mitigation in high speed and high Reynolds number jets using plasma actuators. AIAA Paper 2007–3622

  • Samimy M, Kim J-H, Kastner J, Adamovich I, Utkin Y (2007b) Active control of high-speed and high-Reynolds-number jets using plasma actuators. J Fluid Mech 578:305–330

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Samimy M, Kim J-H, Kastner J, Adamovich I, Utkin Y (2007c) Active control of a mach 0.9 jet for noise mitigation using plasma actuators. AIAA J 45(4):890–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samimy M, Kim J-H, Kearney-Fischer M, Sinha A (2010) Acoustic and flow fields of an excited high Reynolds number axisymmetric supersonic jet. J Fluid Mech 656:507–529

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tam CKW (1998) Jet noise: since 1952. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 10:393–405

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Utkin YG, Keshav S, Kim J-H, Kastner J, Adamovich IV, Samimy M (2007) Development and use of localized arc filament plasma actuators for high-speed flow control. J Phys D Appl Phys 40(3):685–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan K (2002) Analysis of the two similarity components of turbulent mixing noise. AIAA Journal 40(9):1735–1744

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan K (2005) Nozzle shaping for reduction of jet noise from single jets. AIAA J 43(5):1008–1022

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Winant CD, Browand FK (1974) Vortex pairing: the mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 63(2):237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman KBMQ (2009) Jet noise reduction by microjets—a parametric study. AIAA Paper 2009–3129

  • Zaman KBMQ, Reeder MF, Samimy M (1994) Control of an axisymmetric jet using vortex generators. Phys Fluids 6(2):778–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The support of this research by NASA Glenn Research Center with James Bridges and Cliff Brown is greatly appreciated. The authors thank Jin-Hwa Kim for his support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mo Samimy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hahn, C., Kearney-Fischer, M. & Samimy, M. On factors influencing arc filament plasma actuator performance in control of high speed jets. Exp Fluids 51, 1591–1603 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1172-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1172-5

Keywords

Navigation