Abstract
The effects of a trapped vortex cell (TVC) on the aerodynamic performance of a NACA0024 wing model were investigated experimentally at Re = 106 and \(6.67\times 10^{5}\). The static pressure distributions around the model and the wake velocity profiles were measured to obtain lift and drag coefficients, for both the clean airfoil and the controlled configurations. Suction was applied in the cavity region to stabilize the trapped vortex. For comparison, a classical boundary layer suction configuration was also tested. The drag coefficient curve of the TVC-controlled airfoil showed sharp discontinuities and bifurcative behavior, generating two drag modes. A strong influence of the angle of attack, the suction rate and the Reynolds number on the drag coefficient was observed. With respect to the clean airfoil, the control led to a drag reduction only if the suction was high enough. Compared to the classical boundary layer suction configuration, the drag reduction was higher for the same amount of suction only in a specific range of incidence, i.e., α = −2° to α = 6° and only for the higher Reynolds number. For all the other conditions, the classical boundary layer suction configuration gave better drag performances. Moderate increments of lift were observed for the TVC-controlled airfoil at low incidence, while a 20% lift enhancement was observed in the stall region with respect to the baseline. However, the same lift increments were also observed for the classical boundary layer suction configuration. Pressure fluctuation measurements in the cavity region suggested a very complex interaction of several flow features. The two drag modes were characterized by typical unsteady phenomena observed in rectangular cavity flows, namely the shear layer mode and the wake mode.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adkins R (1975) A short diffuser with low pressure loss. J Fluids Eng 97:297–302
AGARD-AR-304: (1994) Quality assessment for wind tunnel testing. NATO Research and Technology Organisation, Neuilly-sur-Seine
AGARD-AR-336: (1998) Wind tunnel wall corrections. NATO Research and Technology Organisation, Neuilly-sur-Seine
Brès A G, Colonius T (2008) Three-dimensional instabilities in compressible flow over open cavities. J Fluid Mech 599:309–339
Chernyshenko SI, Castro IP, Hetsch T, Iollo A, Minisci E, Savelsberg R (2008) Vortex cell shape optimization for separation control. In: 5th European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering (ECCOMAS 2008), Venice, Italy
Choi KS, Fujisawa N (1993) Possibility of drag reduction using d-type roughness. Appl Sci Res 50:315–324
De Gregorio F, Fraioli G (2008) Flow control on a high thickness airfoil by a trapped vortex cavity. In: 14th International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal
Donelli R, Chernyshenko S, Iannelli P, Iollo A, Zannetti L (2009) Flow models for a vortex cell. AIAA Paper 2(47):451–467
Faure T, Pastur L, Lusseyran F, Fraigneau Y, Bisch D (2009) Three-dimensional centrifugal instabilities development inside a parallelepipedic open cavity of various shape. Exp Fluids 47(3):395–410
Gharib M, Roshko A (1987) The effect of flow oscillations on cavity drag. J Fluid Mech 177(1):501–530
Hokpunna A, Manhart M (2007) A large-eddy simulation of vortex cell flow with incoming turbulent boundary layer. Int J Mech Syst Sci Eng 1:123–128
Hung L, Moin P, Kim J (1997) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J Fluid Mech 330:349–374
Iollo A, Zannetti L (2001) Trapped vortex optimal control by suction and blowing at the wall. Eur J Mech B-Fluid 20(1):7–24
Kasper W (1974) Aircraft wing with vortex generation. US Patent 3831885
Larchevêque L, Sagaut P, Labbé O (2007) Large-eddy simulation of a subsonic cavity flow including asymmetric three-dimensional effects. J Fluid Mech 577:105–126
Maull D, East L (1963) Three-dimensional flow in cavities. J Fluid Mech 16:620–632
Migeon C (2002) Details on the start-up development of the Taylor–Gortler-like vortices inside a square-section lid-driven cavity for 1,000 < Re < 3,200. Exp Fluids 33:594–602
Olsman WFJ, Colonius T (2011) Numerical simulation of flow over an airfoil with a cavity. AIAA J 49:143–149
Ringleb F (1961) Separation control by trapped vortices. In: Lachmann GV (ed) Boundary Layer and flow control. Pergamon Press
Rockwell D, Knisely C (1980) Observations of the three-dimensional nature of unstable flow past a cavity. Phys Fluids 23:425–431
Rockwell D, Naudascher E (1979) Self-sustained oscillations of impinging free shear layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech (11):67–94
Rossiter J (1964) Wind-tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Aero Res Counc (No. 3438)
Rowley C, Colonius T, Basu A (2001) On self-sustained oscillations in two dimensional compressible flow over rectangular cavities. J Fluid Mech 455:315–345
Rowley C, Juttijudata V, Williams D (2005) Cavity flow control simulations and experiments. AIAA Paper 292:1–11
Savelsberg R, Castro I (2008) Vortex flows in open cylindrical-section cavities. Exp Fluids 46(3):485–497
Savitsky A, Schukin L, Kareljn V (1995) Method for control of the boundary layer on the aerodynamic surface of an aircraft, and the aircraft provided with boundary layer control system. USPatent 5417391
Schlichting H (1954) Boundary layer theory, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin
Suponitsky V, Avital E, Gaster M (2005) On three dimensionality and control of incompressible cavity flow. Phys Fluids 17(104103):1–19
Acknowledgments
This work is funded by the European Union as part of FP6. We are grateful to Prof. Sergei Chernyshenko for the helpful discussions and suggestions. This work was conducted with the support of Marcello Masili, Marco Grivet and Marco Cannata, during the wind tunnel experimental investigation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lasagna, D., Donelli, R., De Gregorio, F. et al. Effects of a trapped vortex cell on a thick wing airfoil. Exp Fluids 51, 1369–1384 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1160-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1160-9