Skip to main content
Log in

Lift enhancement and flow structure of airfoil with joint trailing-edge flap and Gurney flap

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of Gurney flaps (GF), of different heights and perforations, on the aerodynamic and wake characteristics of a NACA 0015 airfoil equipped with a trailing-edge flap (TEF) was investigated experimentally at Re = 2.54 × 105. The addition of the Gurney flap to the TEF produced a further increase in the downward turning of the mean flow (increased aft camber), leading to a significant increase in the lift, drag, and pitching moment compared to that produced by independently deployed TEF or GF. The maximum lift increased with flap height, with the maximum lift-enhancement effectiveness exhibited at the smallest flap height. The near wake behind the joint TEF and GF became wider and had a larger velocity deficit and fluctuations compared to independent GF and TEF deployment. The Gurney flap perforation had only a minor impact on the wake and aerodynamics characteristics compared to TEF with a solid GF. The rapid rise in lift generation of the joint TEF and GF application, compared to conventional TEF deployment, could provide an improved off-design high-lift device during landing and takeoff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b :

Wing span

c :

Airfoil chord

C d :

Section drag coefficient

C l :

Section lift coefficient

C l,max :

Maximum lift coefficient

C l :

Lift-curve slope

C m :

Section pitching moment coefficient about ¼-chord

C m,peak :

Peak pitching moment coefficient

C p :

Surface pressure coefficient

d :

Perforation hole diameter

h :

Gurney flap height

Re :

Reynolds number, = U c

u :

Mean streamwise velocity

u′:

Streamwise velocity fluctuation

U :

Freestream velocity

x, y, z:

Streamwise, transverse and spanwise direction

α:

Angle of attack

αss :

Static-stall angle

α zl :

Zero-lift angle

δ:

Trailing-edge flap deflection

σ:

Flap porosity

ζ:

Mean streamwise vorticity

ν:

Kinematic viscosity

References

  • Althaus D, Wortmann FX (1981) Stuttgarter Profilkatalog I. Published by Vieweg F and Verlag S

  • Chow R, van Dam CP (2006) Unsteady computational investigations of deploying load control microtabs. J Aircr 43(5):1458–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald BFR (1998) Wind tunnel wall corrections. AGARDograph 336, North Atlantic Treaty Organization

  • Gai SL, Palfrey R (2003) Influence of trailing-edge flow control on airfoil performance. J Aircr 40(2):332–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerontakos P, Lee T (2006a) Oscillating wing loadings with trailing-edge strips. J Aircr 43(2):428–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerontakos P, Lee T (2006b) Active dynamic-stall flow control via a trailing-edge flap. AIAA J 44(3):469–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerontakos P, Lee T (2008) PIV investigation of flow over unsteady airfoil with trailing-edge strip. Exp Fluids 44(4):539–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giguere P, Duma G, Lemay J (1997) Gurney flap scaling for optimum lift-to-drag ratio. AIAA J 35(12):1888–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang CS, Ross JC, Cummings RM (1998) Numerical investigation of an airfoil with a Gurney flap. Aircr Des 1(2):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey D, Zhang X, Hurst DW (2000) Aerodynamics of Gurney flaps on a single-element high-lift wing. J Aircr 37(2):295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kentfield JAC, Clavelle EJ (1993) The flow physics of Gurney flaps, devices for improving turbine blade performance. Wind Eng 17(1):24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Basu S (1998) Measurement of unsteady boundary layer developed on an oscillating airfoil using multiple hot-film sensors. Exp Fluids 25:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Ko LS (2009) PIV investigation of flowfield behind perforated Gurney-type flaps. Exp Fluids 46(6):1005–1019

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang JJ, Zhang P (2003) Influences of mounting angles and locations on the effects of Gurney flaps. J Aircr 40(3):494–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebeck RH (1978) Design of subsonic airfoils for high lift. J Aircr 15(9):547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Monteford J (2007) Thin-airfoil theoretical interpretation for Gurney flap lift enhancement. J Aircr 44(2):667–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maughmer MD, Bramesfeld G (2008) Experimental investigation of Gurney flaps. J Aircr 45(6):2062–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer R, Hage W, Bechert DW, Schatz M, Thiele F (2006) Drag reduction on Gurney flap by three-dimensional modifications. J Aircr 43(1):132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat RJ (1985) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myose R, Papadakis M, Heron I (1998) Gurney flap experiments on airfoils, wings, and reflection plane model. J Aircr 35(2):206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhart DH, Pendergraft OC (1988) A water tunnel study of Gurney flaps. NASA TM-4071

  • Perry ML, Mueller TJ (1985) Leading and trailing edge flaps on a low Reynolds number airfoil. J Aircr 24(9):763–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope A, Rae WH (1984) Low speed wind tunnel testing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie R, Jumper EJ (1996) Experimental measurements of dynamic control surface effectiveness. J Aircr 33(5):880–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AMO (1975) High-lift aerodynamics. J Aircr 12(6):501–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanewsky E (2001) Adaptive wing and flow control technology. Prog Aerosp Sci 37:583–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storms BL, Jang CS (1994) Lift enhancement of an airfoil using a Gurney flap and vortex generators. J Aircr 31(3):542–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang D, Dowell EH (2007) Aerodynamic loading of an airfoil with an oscillating Gurney flap. J Aircr 44(4):245–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodorsen T (1935) General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA TR496

  • Traub LW, Miller AC, Rediniotis O (2006) Preliminary parametric study of Gurney-flap dependencies. J Aircr 43(4):1242–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troolin DR (2009) Private communication. dtroolin@tsi.com

  • Troolin DR, Longmire EK, Lai WT (2006) Time resolved PIV analysis of flow over a NACA 0015 airfoil with Gurney flap. Exp Fluids 41:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam CP, Yen DT, Vijgen PMHW (1999) Gurney flap experiments on airfoil and wings. J Aircr 36(2):484–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vipperman JS, Clark RL, Conner M, Dowell EH (1998) Experimental active control of a typical section using a trailing-edge flap. J Aircr 35(2):224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JJ, Li YC, Choi K-S (2008) Gurney flap-lift enhancement, mechanism and applications. Prog Aerosp Sci 44:22–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee K, Joo W, Lee D-H (2007) Aerodynamic performance analysis of a Gurney flap for rotorcraft application. J Aircr 44(3):1003–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerihan J, Zhang X (2001) Aerodynamics of Gurney flaps on a wing in ground effect. AIAA J 39(5):772–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. L.S. Ko is thanked for his help with the PIV experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, T., Su, Y.Y. Lift enhancement and flow structure of airfoil with joint trailing-edge flap and Gurney flap. Exp Fluids 50, 1671–1684 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-1024-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-1024-8

Keywords

Navigation