Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 1095–1108 | Cite as

Characteristics of flow from an oxy-fuel burner with separated jets: influence of jet injection angle

  • Toufik Boushaki
  • Jean-Charles Sautet
Research article

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study of flow development and structure on a separated jet burner in reacting and non-reacting flows. Effects of deflection jets in an aligned configuration of three round jets are emphasized. The idea is based on the confinement of a central jet of fuel by two side jets of oxygen to improve mixing, to control flame stability, and to reduce pollutant emissions. The fields of mean velocity and fluctuation intensity were measured using Particle Image Velocimetry. The deflection of jets has a considerable effect on the dynamic behavior and on the flame characteristics. Results showed that the deflection of jets favors mixing and accelerates merging and combining of jets to a single one. Measurements in reacting flow showed a high influence of combustion on dynamic fields. Compared to non-reactive case, in combustion, larger radial expansion and higher velocity were observed, particularly, above the stabilization point of the flame.

Keywords

Particle Image Velocimetry Longitudinal Velocity Particle Image Velocimetry Measurement Exit Velocity Centerline Velocity Decay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baukal CE (2003) Industrial burners handbook. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baukal CE, Gebhart B (1997) Oxygen-enhanced/natural gas flame radiation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 40(11):2539–2547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boushaki T, Sautet JC, Salentey L, Labegorre B (2007) The behaviour of lifted oxy-fuel flames in burners with separated jets. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 34:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boushaki T, Mergheni MA, Sautet JC, Labegorre B (2008) Effects of inclined jets on turbulent oxy-flame characteristics in a triple jet burner. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 32:1363–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. GEFGN (1979) Utilisation de l’oxygène dans les flammes de diffusion de gaz naturel. Revue Générale de Thermique (214):643–649Google Scholar
  6. Gutmark EJ, Grinstein FF (1999) Flow control with non circular jets. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 31:239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ivernel A, Marque D (1975) Flammes industrielles de gaz naturel. Influence de la suroxygénation du comburant. In: 2nd European combustion symposium, pp 121–128Google Scholar
  8. Krothapalli A, Bagadanoff D, Karamchetti K (1980) Development and structure of a rectangular jet in a multiple jet configuration. AIAA J 18(8):945–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leite AOP, Ferreira MA, Carvalho JA (1996) An investigation of multiple jet acetylene flames. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 23(7):959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lenze B, Milano ME, Günther R (1975) The mutual influence of multiple jet diffusion flames. Combust Sci Tech 11:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Menon R, Gollahalli SR (1988) Combustion characteristics of interacting multiple jets in cross flow. Combust Sci Tech 60:375–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moawad Ahmed AK, Rajaratnam N, Stanley SJ (2001) Mixing with multiple circular turbulent jets. J Hydraul Res 39(2):163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moustafa GH (1994) Main features of overexpanded triple jets. AIAA J 32(11):2205–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moustafa GH, Rathakrishnan E (1993) Studies on the flow field of multiple jet with square configuration. AIAA J 31(7):1189–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muniz L, Mungal MG (1997) Instantaneous flame stabilization velocities in lifted jet diffusion flames. Combust Flame 11:16–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pani B, Dash R (1983) Three dimensional single and multiple jets. J Hydraul Eng 109(2):254–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perthuis E (1983) La combustion industrielle. Editions Technip, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Raghunathan S, Reid IM (1981) A study of multiple jet. AIAA J 19:124–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sautet JC, Boushaki T, Salentey L, Labegorre B (2006) Oxy-combustion properties of interacting separated jets. Combust Sci Tech 178:2075–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schefer RW, Goix PJ (1998) Mechanism of flame stabilization in turbulent lifted jet flames. Combust Flame 112:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simonich JC (1986) Isolated and interacting round parallel heated jets. AIAA Pap 86–0281Google Scholar
  22. Takagi T, Shin HD, Ishio A (1981) Properties of turbulence in turbulent diffusion flames. Combust Flame 40:121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanaka E (1974) The interference of two dimensional plane jet (2rd report, experiments on the combined flow of dual jet). Bull JSME 17(109):920–927Google Scholar
  24. Tanaka E, Nakata S (1975) The interference of two dimensional plane jet (3rd report, the region near the nozzle in triple jets). Bull JSME 18(124):1134–1141Google Scholar
  25. Watson KA, Lyons KM, Donbar JM, Carter CD (1999) Scalar and velocity field measurements in a lifted CH4-air diffusion flame. Combust Flame 117:257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yimer I, Becker HA, Grandmaison EW (1996) Development of flow from multiple jet burner. AICHE J 74:840–851Google Scholar
  27. Yimer I, Becker HA, Grandmaison EW (2001) The strong jet/weak jet problem: new experiments and CFD. Combust Flame 124:481–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CORIA UMR 6614 CNRS-Université et INSA de ROUENSaint Etienne du Rouvray, CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations