Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 125–136 | Cite as

Characteristics of liquid sheets formed by splash plate nozzles

Research Article

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted to identify the effect of viscosity on the characteristics of liquid sheets formed by a splash plate nozzle. Various mixtures of corn syrup and water are used to obtain viscosities in the range 1–170 mPa.s. Four different splash plates with nozzle diameters of 0.5, 0.75, 1, and 2 mm, with a constant plate angle of 55° were tested. Liquid sheets formed under various operating conditions were directly visualized. The sheet atomization process for the range of parameters studied here is governed by two different mechanisms: Rayleigh–Plateau (R–P) and Rayleigh–Taylor (R–T) instabilities. R–P occurs at the rim and R–T occurs on the thin sheet. The rim instability can be laminar or turbulent, depending on the jet Reynolds number. The R–T instability of the sheet is observed at the outer edges of the radially spreading sheet, where the sheet is the thinnest. It can also occur inside the sheet, due to formation of holes and ruptures.

References

  1. Bremonde N, Villermaux E (2006) Atomization by jet impact. J Fluid Mech 549:273–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bush J, Hasha A (2004) On the collision of laminar jets: fluid chains and fishbones. J Fluid Mech 511:285–310MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Choo Y, Kang B (2003) A study on the velocity characteristics of the liquid elements produced by two impinging jets. Exp Fluids 34:655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choo Y, Kang B (2001) Parametric study on impinging-jet liquid sheet thickness distribution using an interferometric method. Exp Fluids 31:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dombrowski N, Fraser R (1954) A photographic investigation into the disintegration of liquid sheets. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 247:101–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dombrowski N, Hooper PC (1963) A study of spray formed by impinging jets in laminar and turbulent flow. J Fluid Mech 18:392–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dombrowski N, Johns W (1963) The aerodynamic instability and disintegration of viscous liquid sheets. Chem Eng Sci 18:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fard M, Ashgriz N, Mostaghimi J, Leveseque D, Morrison S (2003) Film thickness and velocity distribution in a splash plate atomizer: comparison between simulations and experiments”. In: Proceeding of the 9th international conference on liquid atomization and sprays systems, Sorrento, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  9. Foust D, Hamman K, Detering B (2002) Numerical simulation of black liquor spray characteristics”.In: Proceedings of IMECE’02-ASME international mechanical engineering congress & exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagerty W, Shea J (1955) A study of the stability of plane fluid sheets. J Appl Mech 22:289–289Google Scholar
  11. Lai WH, Huang TH, Jiang TL, Huang W (2005) Effect of fluid properties on the characteristics of impinging-jet sprays. Atomization Sprays 15:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li R, Ashgriz N (2006) Characteristics of liquid sheets formed by two impinging jets. Phys Fluids 18:087104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mckibben J, Aidun C (1994) Computational analysis of flows. TAPPI J 77(5):143–148Google Scholar
  14. Plateau J (1873) Stattique experimentale et theoretique des liquids soumie aux seules forces moleicularies. Chanthier Vallars, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Rayleigh L (1879) On the instability of jets. Proc Lond Math Soc 4:10Google Scholar
  16. Rayleigh L (1883) Investigation of the character of equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc R Soc Lond 14:170–177Google Scholar
  17. Savtchenko S, Ashgriz N (2005) Temporal instability of a capillary jet with a source of mass. Phys Fluids 17:112102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shen Y, Poulikakos D (1998) Thickness variation of liquid sheet formed by two impinging jets using holographic interferometry. ASME J Fluid Eng 120:482–487Google Scholar
  19. Spielbauer T, Aidun C (1992a) Mechanisms of liquid sheet breakup and the resulting drop size distributions, Part 1: types of spray nozzles and mechanisms of sheet disintegration. TAPPI J 73(2):36–142Google Scholar
  20. Spielbauer T, Aidun C (1992b) Mechanisms of liquid sheet breakup and the resulting drop size distributions, Part 2: strand breakup and experimental observations. TAPPI J 73(3):195–200Google Scholar
  21. Spielbauer T, Aidun C (1994a) The cause and effects of perforations in a liquid sheet from a splash-plate nozzle. Atomization Sprays 4:405–436Google Scholar
  22. Spielbauer T, Aidun C (1994b) The wave-thinning and breakup of liquid sheets. J Fluid Eng 116:728–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Squire H (1953) Investigation of the instability of a moving liquid film. Br J Appl Phys 4:167–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor GI (1950) The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in the direction perpendicular to their plane. Proc R Soc Lond A 201:192–196MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied ChemistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations