Abstract
A variational method for post-processing of the velocity fields obtained by particle image velocimetry (PIV) is described. This method allows one to effectively reconstruct the flow field in the areas of the domain where the spurious vectors were discarded either by other filters or manually. If the spurious vectors cannot be removed, they are smoothed in with the surrounding field so that their effect is significantly reduced. The method is based on the application of dynamical constraints such as continuity, smoothness and matching to the original data. The results of the application of the developed algorithm to the velocity fields obtained by PIV in laboratory experiments with quasi-two-dimensional vortex dipoles are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian RJ (1991) Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:261–304
Afanasyev YD, Kostianoy AG, Zatsepin AG, Poulain PM (2002) Analysis of velocity field in the eastern Black Sea from satellite data during the “Black Sea’99” Experiment. J Geophys Res Oceans 107 (10.1029/2000JC000578)
Amodei L (1991) A vector spline approximation. J Approx Theory 67:51–79
Batchelor GK (1967) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brucker Ch (1995) Digital-particle-image-velocimetry (DPIV) in a scanning light-sheet: 3-D starting flow around a short cylinder. Exp Fluids 19:255–263
Fincham A (2003) 3 component, volumetric, time-resolved scanning correlation imaging velocimetry. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry, Busan, Korea, pp 2–16
Fincham A, Spedding G (1997) Low cost, high resolution DPIV for measurement of turbulent fluid flow. Exp Fluids 23:449–462
Gilbert JC, Lemarechal C (1989) Some numerical experiments with variable storage quasi-Newton algorithms. Math Program 45:407–455
Memin E, Perez P (2002) Hierarchical estimation and segmentation of dense motion fields. Int J Comput Vision 46:129–155
Panteleev GG, Maximenko NA, deYoung B, Reiss C, Yamagata T (2002) Variational interpolation of circulation with nonlinear, advective smoothing. J Atmos Ocean Technol 19(9):1442–1450
Paret J, Marteau D, Paireau O, Tabeling P (1997) Are flows electromagnetically forced in thin stratified layers two dimensional. Phys Fluids 9:3102–3106
Pawlak G, Armi L (1998) Vortex dynamics in a spatially accelerating shear layer. J Fluid Mech 376:1–30
Ramamurthy MK, Navon IM (1992) The conjugate-gradient variational analysis and initialization method: an application to MONEX SOP-2 data. Mon Weather Rev 120:2360–2377
Rockwell D, Magness C, Towfighi J, Akin O, Corcoran T (1993) High image-density particle image velocimetry using laser scanning techniques. Exp Fluids 14:181–192
Shapiro R (1970) Smoothing, filtering, and boundary effects. Rev Geophys Space Phys 8:359–387
Shapiro R (1975) Linear filtering. Math Comput 29:1094–1097
Thacker WC (1988) Fitting models to inadequate data by enforcing spatial and temporal smoothing. J Geophys Res 93:10655–10665
Utami T, Ueno T (1984) Visualization and picture processing of turbulent flow. Exp Fluids 2:25–32
Voropayev SI, Afanasyev YD (1994) Vortex structures in a stratified fluid. Chapman & Hall, London
Voropayev SI, Afanasyev YD, Filippov IA (1991) Horizontal jets and vortex dipoles in a stratified fluid. J Fluid Mech 227:543
Wells J, Afanasyev YD (2004) Decaying quasi-two-dimensional turbulence in a rectangular container: laboratory experiments. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 98:1–20
Westerweel J (1994) Efficient detection of spurious vectors in particle image velocimetry data. Exp Fluids 16:236–247
Acknowledgements
The research reported in this paper was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada under grants 300805-04 and 227192-04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afanasyev, Y.D., Demirov, E.K. A variational filtration and interpolation technique for PIV employing fluid dynamical constraints. Exp Fluids 39, 828–835 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0017-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0017-5