Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 466–475 | Cite as

Flow structure of microbubble-laden turbulent channel flow measured by PIV combined with the shadow image technique

  • Atsuhide KitagawaEmail author
  • Koichi Hishida
  • Yoshiaki Kodama
Originals

Abstract

The turbulence structure of a horizontal channel flow with microbubbles is experimentally investigated using combined particle image velocimetry (PIV) in order to clarify the mechanism of drag reduction caused by microbubbles. A new system which simultaneously measures the liquid phase and the dispersed bubbles is proposed, based on a combination of particle tracking velocimetry (PTV), laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) and the shadow image technique (SIT). To accurately obtain the velocity of the liquid phase, tracer particles which overlap with the bubble shadow images are almost entirely eliminated in the post-processing. Finally, the turbulence characteristics of the flow field are presented, including measurements for both phases, and the bubble effect on the turbulence is quantified.

Keywords

Microbubble flow Drag reduction Turbulence modification Particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out as a research activity at the Center for Smart Control of Turbulence funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. We would also like to thank Dr. Sugiyama at the National Maritime Research Institute and Dr. Fujiwara at the University of Tokyo for their comments on this paper.

References

  1. Bröder D, Sommerfeld M (2002) An advanced LIF–PLV system for analysing the hydrodynamics in a laboratory bubble column at higher void fractions. Exp Fluids 33:826–837Google Scholar
  2. Deutsch S, Moeny M, Fontaine A, Petrie H (2003) Microbubble drag reduction in rough walled turbulent boundary layers. In: Proceedings of the 4th ASME/JSME joint fluids engineering conference and FED summer meeting and exposition CD-ROM, Kauai, Hawaii, July 2003, paper no. FEDSM2003-45647, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  3. Ferrante A, Elghobashi S (2004) On the physical mechanisms of drag reduction in a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer laden with microbubbles. J Fluid Mech 503:345–355Google Scholar
  4. Hassan YA, Ortiz-Villafuerte J, Schmidl WD (2001) Three-dimensional measurements of single bubble dynamics in a small diameter pipe using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Int J Multiphase Flow 27:817–842Google Scholar
  5. Hassan YA, Gutierrez TCC, Jimenez BJA, Dominguez OE (2004) Vortical structure modification by microbubble injection in a channel flow. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on multiphase flow (ICMF 2004) CD-ROM, Yokohama, Japan, May/June 2004, paper no. 367, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  6. Ishikawa M, Murai Y, Wada A, Iguchi M, Okamoto K, Yamamoto F (2000) Novel algorithm for particle tracking velocimetry using the velocity gradient tensor. Exp Fluids 29(6):519–531Google Scholar
  7. Kawakita C, Takano S (2000) Microbubble skin friction reduction under the influence of pressure gradients and curved surface (in Japanese). J Soc Naval Archit Jap 188:11–21Google Scholar
  8. Kodama Y, Kakugawa A, Takahashi T, Kawashima H (2000) Experimental study on microbubbles and their applicability to ships for skin friction reduction. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow 21:582–588Google Scholar
  9. Kodama Y, Kakugawa A, Takahashi T, Nagaya S, Sugiyama K SR239 Committee (2002) Microbubbles: drag reduction mechanism and applicability to ships. In: Proceedings of the 24th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan, July 2002, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  10. Lindken R, Merzkirch W (2002) A novel PIV technique for measurements in multiphase flows and its application to two-phase bubbly flows. Exp Fluids 33:814–825Google Scholar
  11. Madavan NK, Deutsch S, Merkle CL (1984) Reduction of turbulent skin friction by microbubbles. Phys Fluids 27:356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCormick ME, Bhattacharyya R (1973) Drag reduction of a submersible hull by electrolysis. Nav Eng J 85:11–16Google Scholar
  13. Minato D, Tanaka T, Fujiwara A, Hishida K, Maeda M (2003) Particle tracking velocimetry measurement of bubble–bubble interaction. In: Proceedings of the 4th ASME/JSME joint fluids engineering conference and FED summer meeting and exposition CD-ROM, Kauai, Hawaii, July 2003, paper no. TED-AJ03–198Google Scholar
  14. Moriguchi Y, Kato H (2002) Influence of microbubble diameter and distribution on frictional resistance reduction. J Mar Sci Technol 7: 79–85Google Scholar
  15. Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN (1999) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=590. Phys Fluids 11(4):943–945Google Scholar
  16. Nagamatsu T, Kodama Y, Kakugawa A, Takai M, Murakami K, Ishikawa S, Kamiirisa H, Ogiwara S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki T, Toda Y, Kato H, Ikemoto A, Yamatani S, Imo S, Yamashita K (2002) A full-scale experiment on microbubbles for skin friction reduction using SEIUN MARU part 2: the full-scale experiment (in Japanese). J Soc Naval Archit Jap 192:15–28Google Scholar
  17. Nishino K, Kasagi N, Hirata M (1989) Three dimensional particle tracking velocimetry based on automatic digital image processing. ASME J Fluid Eng 111:384–391Google Scholar
  18. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 9(1):62–66Google Scholar
  19. Schlichting H (1979) Boundary layer theory 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. So S, Morikita H, Takagi S, Matsumoto Y (2002) Laser Doppler velocimetry measurement of turbulent bubbly channel flow. Exp Fluids 33:135–142Google Scholar
  21. Takehara K, Etoh T (1999) A study on particle identification in PTV. J Visualization 1(3):313–323Google Scholar
  22. Tokuhiro A, Maekawa M, Iizuka K, Hishida K, Maeda M (1998) Turbulent flow past a bubble and an ellipsoid using shadow–image and PIV techniques. Int J Multiphase Flow 24:1383–1406Google Scholar
  23. van der Brug GJ (1977) Experiments in iterative enhancement of linear features. Comput Graph Image Processing 6:25–42Google Scholar
  24. Xu J, Maxey MR, Karniadakis GE (2002) Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction using micro-bubbles. J Fluid Mech 468:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamamoto F, Wada A, Iguchi M, Ishikawa M (1996) Discussion of the cross-correlation methods for PIV. J Flow Visual Image Processing 3(1):65–78Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsuhide Kitagawa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Koichi Hishida
    • 2
  • Yoshiaki Kodama
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and System EngineeringKyoto Institute of TechnologyKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of System Design EngineeringKeio UniversityKanagawaJapan
  3. 3.Center for Smart Control of TurbulenceNational Maritime Research InstituteTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations