Abstract
The present paper reports a complete set of measurements made with a two-component phase Doppler anemometer of the two-phase flow generated at the impact of a transient gasoline spray onto a flat surface. The spray is generated by a pintle injector and the fuel used was gasoline. The measurements of droplet size–velocity were processed to provide time fluxes of number, mass, normal momentum, and energy of the poly-dispersion of droplets ejected at impact, and analyzed based on predictive tools available in the literature. The results show that splash is the dominant mechanism by which secondary droplets are ejected from the surface, either in the stagnation region or in the core region of the spray. In the stagnation region, a large fraction of each incident droplet adheres to the surface and the axial incident momentum contributes with a larger parcel than tangential momentum. As a result, the normal velocity of ejected droplets is much smaller than that of the original incident droplets, while tangential velocity is enhanced. The region near the stagnation point is immediately flooded upon impact of the leading front of the spray, forming a liquid film that is forced to move radially outwards as droplets continue to impinge during the steady period. Spray/wall interaction in the core region thus occurs in the presence of a moving thin liquid film, which enhances transfer of tangential momentum. As a result, film spreading and dynamics as a result of impingement forces are crucial to accurate model spray/wall interaction. The outer region of the spray is dominated by the vortical structure induced by shear forces, which entrains small responsive secondary droplets to re-impinge. Furthermore, prediction of the outcome of spray impact requires a precise knowledge of the two-phase flow in the presence of the target.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai C, Gosman AD (1995) Development of methodology for spray impingement simulation. SAE Tech Paper 950283
Bai C, Rusche H, Gosman AD (2002) Modeling of gasoline spray impingement. Atomiz Sprays 12:1–27
Brenn G, Büdingen Gv, Tropea C, Maeda M (1995) Experimenal study of spray impact on a sphere. In: Serizawa, Fukano and Bataille (eds) Advances in multiphase flow. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, pp 139–150
Cossali CE, Brunello G, Coghe A, Marengo M (1999) Impact of a single drop on a liquid film: experimental analysis and comparison with empirical models. In: Italian Congress of Thermofluid Dynamics, UIT, Ferrara
Cossali GE, Coghe A, Marengo M (1997) The impact of a single drop on a wetted surface. Exp Fluids 22:463–472
Grover RO, Assanis DN (2001) A spray wall impingement model based upon conservation principles. In: COMODIA, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Diagnostics and modeling of combustion in internal combustion engineering, Nagoya, Japan
Hardalupas Y, Okamoto S, Taylor AMKP, Whitelaw JH (1992) Application of a phase Doppler anemometer to a spray impinging on a disc. In: Adrian RJ, Durão DFG, Durst F, Heitor MV, Maeda M (eds), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 490–506
Lee MM, Hanratty TJ (1988) The inhibition of droplet deposition by the presence of a liquid film. Int J Multiphase Flow 14:129–140
Lee SH, Ko G, Ryou HS, Hong KB (2001) Development and application of a new spray impingement model considering film formation in a diesel engine. KSME Int J 15:951–961
Lefebvre AH (1989) Atomization and sprays. Taylor & Francis, London
Li SC, Libby PA, Williams FA (1994) Experimental and theoretical studies of spray impingement on a hot surface in reacting stagnation flows. In: 30th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA paper 94-328, Indianapolis
Macklin WC, Metaxas GJ (1976) Splashing of drops on liquid layers. J Appl Phys 47:3963–3970
Marengo M (1996) Analysis of the droplets impact on a thin liquid film. PhD Thesis, Politecnico of Milan, Italy
Moita AS, Moreira ALN (2002) The deformation of single droplets impacting onto a flat surface. J Fuels Lubricants 1477–1489
Mundo C, Sommerfeld M, Tropea C (1995) Droplet–wall collisions: experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process. Int J Multiphase Flow 21:81–173
Mundo C, Sommerfeld M, Tropea C (1998) On the modelling of liquid sprays impinging on surfaces. Atomiz Sprays 8:625–652
Panão MRO, Moreira ALN (2004) Experimental characterization of intermittent gasoline sprays impinging under cross-flow conditions. Atomiz Sprays (in press)
Rioboo R, Marengo M, Cossali GE, Tropea C (2000) Comparison of drop impact: dry and wetted cases. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Liquid atom and spray systems, Darmstadt
Rioboo R, Tropea C, Marengo M (2001) Outcomes from a drop impact on solid surfaces. Atomiz Sprays 11:155–165
Roisman IV, Tropea C (2001) Flux measurements in sprays using phase Doppler techniques. Atomiz Sprays 11:667–700
Roisman IV, Tropea C (2002) Flow on a wall surface due to spray impact. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Liquid atom and spray systems, Zaragoza
Roisman IV, Araneo L, Marengo M, Tropea C (1999) Evaluation of drop impingement models: experimental and numerical analysis of a spray impact. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Atomization and spray systems, Toulouse
Saffman M (1987) Automatic calibration of LDA measurement volume size. Appl Optics 26:2592–2597
Sikalo S, Marengo M, Tropea C, Ganic EN (2002) Analysis of impact of droplets on horizontal surfaces. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 25:503–510
Sivakumar D, Tropea C (2002) Splashing impact of a spray onto a liquid film. Phys Fluids 14:L85–L88
Stanton D, Rutland C (1996) Modelling fuel film formation and wall interaction in diesel engines. SAE Tech paper 960628
Stow CD, Hadfield MG (1981) An experimental investigation of fluid flow resulting from the impact of a water drop with an unyielding dry surface. Proc R Soc Lond 373:419–441
Tate RW (1982) Some problems associated with the accurate representation of droplet size distributions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Liquid atom and spray systems, Madison
Tropea C, Roisman IV (2000) Modeling of spray impact on solid surfaces. Atomiz Sprays 10:387–408
Wang A-B, Chen C-C, Hwang W-C (2002) On some new aspects of splashing impact of drop–liquid surface interactions. In: Rein M (ed), Drop–surface interactions. Springer, Heidelberg
Weiss DA, Yarin AL (1999) Single drop impact onto liquid films: neck distortion, jetting, tiny bubble entrainment, and crown formation. J Fluid Mech 385:229–254
Yarin AL, Weiss DA (1995) Impact of drops on solid surfaces: self-similar capillary waves, and splashing as a new type of kinematics discontinuity. J Fluid Mech 283:141–173
Zhao F-Q, Lai M-C, Amer AA, Dressler JL (1996) Atomization characteristics of pressure-modulated automotive port injector sprays. Atomiz Sprays 6:461–483
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panão, M.R.O., Moreira, A.L.N. Experimental study of the flow regimes resulting from the impact of an intermittent gasoline spray. Exp Fluids 37, 834–855 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0868-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0868-1