Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Real-world-Ergebnisse von glaukomchirurgischen Verfahren beim Offenwinkelglaukom

Real-world outcomes of glaucoma surgical procedures for open-angle glaucoma

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Die Ophthalmologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Erratum to this article was published on 26 January 2024

This article has been updated

Zusammenfassung

Diese Arbeit bietet einen Überblick über Real-world-Ergebnisse bei glaukomchirurgischen Verfahren. Obwohl randomisierte klinische Studien wichtige Erkenntnisse liefern, spiegeln sie nicht das reale Versorgungsgeschehen wider. Real-world-Studien ermöglichen eine Beurteilung der Ergebnisse außerhalb kontrollierter Settings und sind für die Beratung und Entscheidungsfindung bei Glaukombehandlung von großer Bedeutung. Durch die Untersuchung von Real-world-Daten zielt die Arbeit darauf ab, seltene unerwünschte Ereignisse zu identifizieren, die in kontrollierten klinischen Studien möglicherweise übersehen werden. Der Fokus liegt darauf, die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von glaukomchirurgischen Verfahren über das kontrollierte Studiensetting hinaus zu bewerten.

Abstract

This article provides an overview of real-world outcomes in glaucoma surgical procedures. While randomized clinical trials provide valuable insights, they do not fully reflect real-world clinical practice. Real-world studies enable the evaluation of outcomes in uncontrolled settings and play a crucial role in counselling and decision-making for glaucoma treatment. By examining real-world data the article aims to identify rare adverse events that may go unnoticed in controlled clinical trials. The focus is on assessing the effectiveness and safety of glaucoma surgical procedures beyond the controlled trial setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Change history

Literatur

  1. Holz FG, Tadayoni R, Beatty S, Berger A, Cereda MG, Cortez R et al (2015) Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 99:220–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolfram C, Schuster AK (2022) Glaucoma care in Germany-results of a survey among German ophthalmologists-part 2: treatment. Ophthalmologie 119:1140–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saheb H, Ahmed IIK (2012) Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 23:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jordan JF, Wecker T, van Oterendorp C, Anton A, Reinhard T, Boehringer D et al (2013) Trabectome surgery for primary and secondary open angle glaucomas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2753–2760

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Akil H, Chopra V, Huang A, Loewen N, Noguchi J, Francis BA (2016) Clinical results of ab interno trabeculotomy using the Trabectome in patients with pigmentary glaucoma compared to primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 44:563–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ting JLM, Damji KF, Stiles MC, Trabectome Study Group (2012) Ab interno trabeculectomy: outcomes in exfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:315–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strzalkowska A, Strzalkowski P, Al Yousef Y, Grehn F, Hillenkamp J, Loewen NA (2021) Exact matching of trabectome-mediated ab interno trabeculectomy to conventional trabeculectomy with mitomycin C followed for 2 years. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259:963–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jea SY, Francis BA, Vakili G, Filippopoulos T, Rhee DJ (2012) Ab interno trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 119:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kornmann HL, Fellman RL, Feuer WJ, Butler MR, Godfrey DG, Smith OU et al (2019) Early results of goniotomy with the Kahook dual blade, a novel device for the treatment of glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 13:2369–2376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sieck EG, Epstein RS, Kennedy JB, SooHoo JR, Pantcheva MB, Patnaik JL et al (2018) Outcomes of Kahook dual blade Goniotomy with and without phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 1:75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shue A, Levine RM, Gallousis GM, Teng CC (2019) Cyclodialysis cleft associated with Kahook dual blade goniotomy. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 13:74–76

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Guedes RAP, Gravina DM, Lake JC, Guedes VMP, Chaoubah A (2019) Intermediate results of iStent or iStent inject implantation combined with cataract surgery in a real-world setting: a longitudinal retrospective study. Ophthalmol Ther 8:87–100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Klamann MKJ, Gonnermann J, Pahlitzsch M, Maier A‑KB, Joussen AM, Torun N et al (2015) iStent inject in phakic open angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:941–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bicket AK, Le JT, Azuara-Blanco A, Gazzard G, Wormald R, Bunce C et al (2021) Minimally invasive glaucoma surgical techniques for open-angle glaucoma: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews and network meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol 139:983–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grierson I, Saheb H, Kahook MY, Johnstone MA, Ahmed IIK, Schieber AT et al (2015) A novel Schlemm’s canal scaffold: histologic observations. J Glaucoma 24:460–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jabłońska J, Lewczuk K, Rękas MT (2023) Comparison of safety and efficacy of Hydrus and iStent combined with phacoemulsyfication in open angle glaucoma patients: 24-month follow-up. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Salimi A, Kassem R, Santhakumaran S, Harasymowycz P (2023) Three-year outcomes of a Schlemm canal microstent (Hydrus Microstent) with concomitant phacoemulsification in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 6:137–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Larrosa JM, Fea A, Lemij H et al (2015) A randomized trial of a Schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 122:1283–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loayza-Gamboa W, Martel-Ramirez V, Inga-Condezo V, Valderrama-Albino V, Alvarado-Villacorta R, Valera-Cornejo D (2020) Outcomes of combined prolene gonioscopy assisted transluminal trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification in open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 14:3009–3016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cubuk MO, Ucgul AY, Unsal E (2020) Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy as an option after failed trabeculectomy. Int Ophthalmol 40:1923–1930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharkawi E, Lindegger DJ, Artes PH, Lehmann-Clarke L, El Wardani M, Misteli M et al (2021) Outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma: 24-month follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol 105:977–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo C‑Y, Qi X‑H, Qi J‑M (2020) Systematic review and Meta-analysis of treating open angle glaucoma with gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy. Int J Ophthalmol 13:317–324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Grover DS, Flynn WJ, Bashford KP, Lewis RA, Duh Y‑J, Nangia RS et al (2017) Performance and safety of a new ab interno gelatin stent in refractory glaucoma at 12 months. Am J Ophthalmol 183:25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reitsamer H, Sng C, Vera V, Lenzhofer M, Barton K, Stalmans I et al (2019) Two-year results of a multicenter study of the ab interno gelatin implant in medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:983–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansouri K, Bravetti GE, Gillmann K, Rao HL, Ch’ng TW, Mermoud A (2019) Two-year outcomes of XEN gel Stent surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2:309–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gillmann K, Bravetti GE, Rao HL, Mermoud A, Mansouri K (2021) Combined and stand-alone XEN 45 gel stent implantation: 3‑year outcomes and success predictors. Acta Ophthalmol 99:e531–e539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lenzhofer M, Kersten-Gomez I, Sheybani A, Gulamhusein H, Strohmaier C, Hohensinn M et al (2019) Four-year results of a minimally invasive transscleral glaucoma gel stent implantation in a prospective multi-centre study. Clinical Exper Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rauchegger T, Angermann R, Willeit P, Schmid E, Teuchner B (2021) Two-year outcomes of minimally invasive XEN Gel Stent implantation in primary open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 99:369–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sng CC, Wang J, Hau S, Htoon HM, Barton K (2018) XEN-45 collagen implant for the treatment of uveitic glaucoma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 46:339–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bormann C, Schmidt M, Busch C, Rehak M, Scharenberg CT, Unterlauft JD (2022) Implantation of XEN after failed trabeculectomy: an efficient therapy? Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 239:86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Buffault J, Graber M, Bensmail D, Bluwol É, Jeanteur M‑N, Abitbol O et al (2020) Efficacy and safety at 6 months of the XEN implant for the management of open angle glaucoma. Sci Rep 10:4527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta C, Mathews D (2019) XEN® stent complications: a case series. BMC Ophthalmol 19:253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Karri B, Gupta C, Mathews D (2018) Endophthalmitis following XEN stent exposure. J Glaucoma 27:931–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Theilig T, Rehak M, Busch C, Bormann C, Schargus M, Unterlauft JD (2020) Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and XEN gel microstent implantation for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective monocentric comparative cohort study. Sci Rep 10:19337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cappelli F, Cutolo CA, Olivari S, Testa V, Sindaco D, Pizzorno C et al (2022) Trabeculectomy versus Xen gel implant for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a 3-year retrospective analysis. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 7:e830

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Baker ND, Barnebey HS, Moster MR, Stiles MC, Vold SD, Khatana AK et al (2021) Ab-externo microshunt versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: one-year results from a 2-year randomized, multicenter study. Ophthalmology 128:1710–1721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pawiroredjo SSM, Bramer WM, Pawiroredjo ND, Pals J, Poelman HJ, de Vries VA et al (2022) Efficacy of the PRESERFLO microshunt and a meta-analysis of the literature. J Clin Med Res. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fea AM, Laffi GL, Martini E, Economou MA, Caselgrandi P, Sacchi M et al (2022) Effectiveness of microshunt in patients with primary open-angle and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma: a retrospective European multicenter study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 5:210–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Quaranta L, Micheletti E, Carassa R, Bruttini C, Fausto R, Katsanos A et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of PreserFlo® microshunt after a failed trabeculectomy in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective study. Adv Ther 38:4403–4412

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Micheletti E, Riva I, Bruttini C, Quaranta L (2020) A case of delayed-onset hemorrhagic choroidal detachment after PreserFlo Microshunt implantation in a glaucoma patient under anticoagulant therapy. J Glaucoma 29:e87–e90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brambati M, Bettin P, Ramoni A, Battista M, Bandello F (2022) A case of endophthalmitis following needling procedure after PRESERFLO® Micro Shunt implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol 32:NP83–NP86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jamke M, Herber R, Haase MA, Jasper CS (2023) PRESERFLOTM MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1‑year results on efficacy and safety. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06075-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wagner FM, Schuster AK, Munder A, Muehl M, Chronopoulos P, Pfeiffer N et al (2022) Comparison of subconjunctival microinvasive glaucoma surgery and trabeculectomy. Acta Ophthalmol 100:e1120–e1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kuet M‑L, Azuara-Blanco A, Barton K, King AJ (2022) Will the PRESERFLOTM MicroShunt impact the future of trabeculectomy practice? A UK and Éire Glaucoma Society National Survey. Eye. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02326-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Stingl JV, Wagner FM, Liebezeit S, Baumgartner R, Spät H, Schuster AK et al (2023) Long-term efficacy and safety of modified canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Life. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020516

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nassri L, Plange N, Lindemann F, Schellhase H, Walter P, Kuerten D (2020) Therapieerfolg von Kanaloplastik und Trabekulektomie durch denselben Operateur mit demselben Erfahrungslevel im Langzeitverlauf. Ophthalmologe 117:1025–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2010) Canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma: long-term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1478–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seuthe A‑M, Ivanescu C, Leers S, Boden K, Januschowski K, Szurman P (2016) Modified canaloplasty with suprachoroidal drainage versus conventional canaloplasty-1-year results. Arbeitsphysiologie 254:1591–1597

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gesser C, Wiermann A, Keserü M, Richard G, Klemm M (2014) Long-term follow-up after deep sclerectomy. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 231:535–539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shaarawy T, Mansouri K, Schnyder C, Ravinet E, Achache F, Mermoud A (2004) Long-term results of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1225–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schuster AK, Uhrig M, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM (2022) Wie lernt man eine Trabekulektomie operieren? Die Ophthalmol 119:1006–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P (2012) A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 119:694–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wagner FM, Schuster AK, Kianusch K, Stingl J, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM (2023) Long-term success after trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: results of a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 13:e68403

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen PP (2003) Blindness in patients with treated open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 110:726–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Singh J, O’Brien C, Chawla HB (1995) Success rate and complications of intraoperative 0.2 mg/ml mitomycin C in trabeculectomy surgery. Eye 9(Pt 4):460–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP (2002) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye 16:297–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Feiner L, Piltz-Seymour JR (2003) Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: a summary of results to date. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 14:106–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Montesano G, Ometto G, King A, Garway-Heath DF, Crabb DP (2023) Two-year visual field outcomes of the treatment of advanced glaucoma study (TAGS). Am J Ophthalmol 246:42–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Weber C, Hundertmark S, Brinken R, Holz FG, Mercieca K (2022) Erste klinische Ergebnisse mit dem PAUL®-Glaukom-Implantat an der Universitäts-Augenklinik Bonn. Ophthalmologie 119:1267–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Goulet RJ 3rd, A‑DT P, Cantor LB, WuDunn D (2008) Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 glaucoma valve compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 glaucoma implant. Ophthalmology 115:1141–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL (2009) Three-year-follow-up of the tube versus Trabeculectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol 148(5):670–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Godinho G, Barbosa-Breda J, Oliveira-Ferreira C, Madeira C, Melo A, Falcão-Reis F et al (2021) Anterior chamber versus ciliary Sulcus Ahmed glaucoma valve tube placement: longitudinal evaluation of corneal endothelial cell profiles. J Glaucoma 30:170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Iwasaki K, Arimura S, Takihara Y, Takamura Y, Inatani M (2018) Prospective cohort study of corneal endothelial cell loss after Baerveldt glaucoma implantation. PLoS ONE 13:e201342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. José P, Barão RC, Teixeira FJ, Marques RE, Peschiera R, Barata A et al (2022) One-year efficacy and safety of the PAUL glaucoma implant using a standardized surgical protocol. J Glaucoma 31:201–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tan MCJ, Choy HYC, Koh Teck CV, Aquino MC, Sng CCA, Lim DKA et al (2022) Two-year outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant for treatment of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 31:449–455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang S, Gao X, Qian N (2016) The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 16:83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Hoffmann EM, Hengerer F, Klabe K, Schargus M, Thieme H, Voykov B (2021) Glaucoma surgery today. Ophthalmologe 118:239–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Samuelson TW, Sarkisian SR Jr, Lubeck DM, Stiles MC, Duh Y‑J, Romo EA et al (2019) Prospective, randomized, controlled pivotal trial of an Ab Interno implanted trabecular micro-bypass in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year results. Ophthalmology 126:811–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland

    Alicja Strzalkowska, Esther M. Hoffmann, Julia V. Stingl, Norbert Pfeiffer & Alexander K. Schuster

  2. Augenklinik Helios HSK Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Deutschland

    Piotr Strzalkowski

Authors
  1. Alicja Strzalkowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esther M. Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Piotr Strzalkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julia V. Stingl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norbert Pfeiffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alexander K. Schuster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicja Strzalkowska.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Strzalkowska, E.M. Hoffmann, P. Strzalkowski, J.V. Stingl, N. Pfeiffer und K. Schuster geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Hinweis des Verlags

Der Verlag bleibt in Hinblick auf geografische Zuordnungen und Gebietsbezeichnungen in veröffentlichten Karten und Institutsadressen neutral.

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Die Originalversion dieses Beitrags wurde korrigiert: der Name von dem Autor Alexander K. Schuster fälschlicherweise als „K. Schuster“ angegeben. Außerdem wurden die Vornamen von den anderen Autor*innen nun ausgeschrieben: Alicja Strzalkowska, Esther M. Hoffmann, Piotr Strzalkowski, Julia V. Stingl und Norbert Pfeiffer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strzalkowska, A., Hoffmann, E.M., Strzalkowski, P. et al. Real-world-Ergebnisse von glaukomchirurgischen Verfahren beim Offenwinkelglaukom. Ophthalmologie 120, 1107–1116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-023-01941-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-023-01941-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation