Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sind Organ- und Kokulturen eine Alternative zu Tiermodellen in der Augenheilkunde?

Are organ and co-cultures an alternative to animal models in ophthalmology?

Are organ and co-cultures an alternative to animal models in ophthalmology?

  • Young DOG
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Hurst J et al (2017) Negative Effects of Acid Violet-17 and MBB Dual In Vitro on Different Ocular Cell Lines. Curr Eye Res 42(8):1209–1214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Croft CL et al (2019) Organotypic brain slice cultures to model neurodegenerative proteinopathies. Mol Neurodegener 14(1):45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner N et al (2020) Novel Porcine Retina Cultivation Techniques Provide Improved Photoreceptor Preservation. Front Neurosci 14:556700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wongvisavavit R et al (2021) Challenges in corneal endothelial cell culture. Regen Med 16(9):871–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Behar-Cohen F et al (2020) Anatomy of the retina. Med Sci (paris) 36(6-7):594–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EGS, European Glaucoma (2017) Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition - Chapter 2: Classification and terminology Supported by the EGS Foundation. Part 1: Foreword; Introduction; Glossary; Chapter 2. Classif Terminol 101(5):73–127

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuehn S et al (2017) Degenerative effects of cobalt-chloride treatment on neurons and microglia in a porcine retina organ culture model. Exp Eye Res 155:107–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hurst J et al (2017) A novel porcine ex vivo retina culture model for oxidative stress induced by H(2)O(2). Altern Lab Anim 45(1):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohlin C et al (2018) A model to study complement involvement in experimental retinal degeneration. Ups J Med Sci 123(1):28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson UE, Eftekhari S, Warfvinge K (2010) A battery of cell- and structure-specific markers for the adult porcine retina. J Histochem Cytochem 58(4):377–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maliha AM et al (2019) Diminished apoptosis in hypoxic porcine retina explant cultures through hypothermia. Sci Rep 9(1):4898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mueller-Buehl AM et al (2021) Reduced Retinal Degeneration in an Oxidative Stress Organ Culture Model through an iNOS-Inhibitor. Biol (basel) 10(5):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10050383

  13. Wong WL et al (2014) Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2(2):e106–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen M, Xu H (2015) Parainflammation, chronic inflammation, and age-related macular degeneration. J Leukoc Biol 98(5):713–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrington DA, Sinha D, Kaarniranta K (2016) Defects in retinal pigment epithelial cell proteolysis and the pathology associated with age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res 51:69–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleckenstein M et al (2021) Age-related macular degeneration. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7(1):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dithmer M et al (2016) The role of Fc-receptors in the uptake and transport of therapeutic antibodies in the retinal pigment epithelium. Exp Eye Res 145:187–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hazim RA et al (2019) Rapid differentiation of the human RPE cell line, ARPE-19, induced by nicotinamide. Exp Eye Res 179:18–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fronk AH, Vargis E (2016) Methods for culturing retinal pigment epithelial cells: a review of current protocols and future recommendations. J Tissue Eng 7:2041731416650838

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitäts-Augenklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, In der Schornau 23–25, 44892, Bochum, Deutschland

    Ana M. Müller-Bühl, Armin Safaei &  Teresa Tsai

Authors
  1. Ana M. Müller-Bühl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Armin Safaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teresa Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müller-Bühl, A., Safaei, A. & Tsai, T. Sind Organ- und Kokulturen eine Alternative zu Tiermodellen in der Augenheilkunde?. Ophthalmologe 119, 530–532 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01565-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01565-4

Search

Navigation