Skip to main content
Log in

Primäre hintere Kapsulorhexis in schwierigen Situationen

Primary posterior capsulorhexis in difficult situations

  • Das diagnostische und therapeutische Prinzip
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die primäre hintere Kapsulorhexis („primary continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis“ [PCCC]) im Rahmen der Kataraktoperation ist eine sichere und effektive Methode, um die Bildung eines Nachstares zu verhindern. Bei zusätzlicher Einknöpfung der Linsenoptik in die hintere Kapselöffnung kann ein Nachrotieren torischer Linsen ausgeschlossen werden. Dieser Beitrag zeigt, dass die PCCC auch in schwierigen Situationen sicher angewendet werden kann.

Abstract

Primary opening of the posterior capsule (primary continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, PCCC) during cataract surgery is a safe and efficient procedure to prevent formation of an aftercataract. When combined with buttonholing of the optic in the posterior capsule opening no unintended rotation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) can occur postoperatively. This article shows that PCCC can be safely performed even in difficult situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Bhargava R, Kumar P, Sharma SK, Kaur A (2015) A randomized controlled trial of peeling and aspiration of Elschnig pearls and neodymium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser capsulotomy. Int J Ophthalmol 8(3):590–596

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Groot V, Hubert M, Van Best JA, Engelen S, Van Aelst S, Tassignon MJ (2003) Lack of fluorophotometric evidence of aqueous-vitreous barrier disruption after posterior capsulorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2330–2338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dick HB, Schultz T (2014) Primary posterior laser-assisted capsulotomy. J Refract Surg 30(2):128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haitham YA, Ahmad SK (2016) Primary posterior capsulotomy in adults with posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1615–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim KH, Kim WS (2010) Intraocular lens stability and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis. Ophthalmology 117(12):2278–2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Menapace R (2008) Posterior capsulorhexis combined with optic buttonholing: an alternative to standard in-the-bag implantation of sharp-edged intraocular lenses? A critical analysis of 1000 consecutive cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246(6):787–801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ouchi M (2016) Primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis combined with diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Eye 30:95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozyol E, Ozyol P, Doğanay Erdoğan B, Onen M (2014) The role of anterior hyaloid face integrity on retinal complications during Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252(1):71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rönbeck M, Zetterström C, Wejde G, Kugelberg M (2009) Comparison of posterior capsule opacification development with 3 intraocular lens types: five-year prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(11):1935–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scheers D, Van Os L, Ní Dhubhghaill S, Wouters K, Tassignon MJ (2020) Clinically significant pseudophakic cystoid macular edema after bag-in-the-lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 46(6):606–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stifter E, Menapace R, Kriechbaum K, Vock L, Luksch A (2009) Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with and without posterior optic buttonholing on postoperative anterior chamber flare. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:480–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stifter E, Menapace R, Neumayer T, Luksch A (2008) Macular morphology after cataract surgery with primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing. Am J Ophthalmol 146(1):15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tassignon MJ, De Groot V, Vrensen GF (2002) Bag-in-the-lens implantation of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 28(7):1182–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van den Heurck JJI, Boven KBM, Van Looveren J, Mathysen DGP, Chiairi I, Tassignon MJ (2020) Incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after bag-in-the-lens IOL implantation: extended follow-up in a larger cohort of patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 46(6):820–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wesolosky JD, Tennant M, Rudnisky CJ (2017) Rate of retinal tear and detachment after neodymium:YAG capsulotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(7):923–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yazici AT, Bozkurt E, Altan CD, Albayrak S, Cakir M, Alagoz N, Yilmaz OF (2010) Macular thickness changes after phacoemulsification combined with primary posterior curvilinear capsulorhexis. Eye 24(5):805–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Köhler.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Köhler, K. Köhler und J. Köhler geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köhler, J., Köhler, K. & Köhler, J. Primäre hintere Kapsulorhexis in schwierigen Situationen. Ophthalmologe 117, 1138–1142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01245-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01245-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation