Skip to main content
Log in

Indikation und chirurgisches Vorgehen bei Makulaschichtforamen und Pseudoforamen

Indications and surgical approach for lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Es erfolgen die Darstellung und Diskussion der Indikation zur Operation von Makulaschichtforamen und Pseudoforamen.

Fragestellung

Auf welchen Kriterien basiert die Entscheidung zur chirurgischen Intervention bei einem Schichtforamen und Pseudoforamen der Makula?

Material und Methoden

Der Artikel basiert auf einer Literaturrecherche mit PubMed.

Ergebnisse

Makulaschichtforamina und Pseudoforamina werden in degenerative und traktive Veränderungen unterteilt. Beiden Veränderungen sind relativ typische morphologische Kriterien zugeordnet, die mit dem zu erwartenden funktionellen und morphologischen Ergebnis einer Operation korrelieren. Demnach profitieren eher Patienten mit einem Pseudoforamen von einem operativen Eingriff, da Veränderungen der äußeren Netzhaut in diesen Fällen weniger ausgeprägt sind.

Diskussion

Die mögliche chirurgische Behandlung von Makulaschichtforamina und Pseudoforamina orientiert sich am Typ des Schichtdefekts und seinen morphologischen und funktionellen Besonderheiten.

Abstract

Background

This article presents a discussion on the indications for surgical interventions of lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes.

Objective

What are the criteria for deciding on the surgical intervention for lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes?

Material and methods

The article is based on a literature search in PubMed

Results

Lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes are subdivided into degenerative and tractive alterations. Both entities are associated with relatively specific morphological and functional criteria, which correlate with the expected functional and morphological results of the surgical intervention. Patients with pseudoholes therefore profit more from a surgical intervention because alterations to the outer retina are less pronounced in these cases.

Conclusion

The indications for surgery of lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes are established by the type of lamellar defect and the morphological and functional alterations associated with this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Androudi S, Stangos A, Brazikitos PD (2009) Lamllar macular holes: tomographic features and surgical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 148:420–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bottoni F, Deiro AP, Giani A, Orini C, Cigada M, Staurenghi C (2013) The natural history of lamellar macular holes: a spectral domain optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:467–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Compera D, Entchev E, Haritoglou C, Scheler R, Mayer WJ, Wolf A, Kampik A, Schumann RG (2015) Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in comparison to epiretinal membranes of macular pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol 160(2):373–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Compera D, Schumann RG, Cereda MG, Acquistapace A, Lita V, Priglinger SG, Staurenghi G, Bottoni F (2017) Progression of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation and retinal changes during long-term follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gass JD (1976) Lamellar macular hole: a complication of cystoid macular edema after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol 94:793–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaudric A, Aloulou Y, Tadayoni R, Massin P (2013) Macular pseudoholes with lamellar cleavage of their edge remain pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol 155:733–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Govetto A, Dacquay Y, Farajzadeh M, Platner E, Hirabayashi K, Hosseini H, Schwartz SD, Hubschmann J (2016) Lamellar macular hole: two distinct clinical entities? Am J Ophthalmol 164:99–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haouchine B, Massin P, Tadayoni R, Erginay A, Gaudric A (2004) Diagnosis of macular Pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 138:732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, Priglinger SG, Gass CA, Kampik A (2007) Long-term functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 35(3):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirota K, Itoh Y, Rii T, Inoue M, Hirakata A (2015) Correlation between foveal interdigitation zone band defect and visual acuity after surgery for macular pseudohole. Retina 35(5):908–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai T, Chen S, Yang C (2016) Epiretinal proliferation in lamellar macular holes and full thicknes macular holes: clinical and surgical outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254:629–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Odrobina D, Pikulski Z, Cisiecki S, Dziegielewski K, Nawrocki J (2010) Surgical treatment of lamellar macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1395–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parolini B, Schumann RG, Cereda MG, Haritoglou C, Pertile G (2011) Lamellar macular hole: a clinicopathologic correlation of surgically excised epiretinal membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:9074–9083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schumann RG, Compera D, Schaumberger M, Wolf A, Fazekas C, Mayer WM, Kampik A, Haritoglou C (2015) Epiretinal membrane characteristics correlate with photoreceptor layer defects in lamellar macular holes and macular pseudoholes. Retina 35(4):727. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiraga F, Takasu I, Fukuda K, Fujita T, Yamashita A, Hirooka K, Shirakata Y, Morizane Y, Fujiwara A (2013) Modified vitreous surgery for symptomatic lamellar macular hole with epiretinal membrane containing macular pigment. Retina 33(6):1263–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun JP, Chen SN, Chuang CC, Lin CW, Lin CJ, Huang JY, Yang CM, Chen MS, Yang CH (2013) Surgical treatment of lamellar macular hole secondary to epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(12):2681–2688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka Y, Shimada N, Moriyama M et al (2011) Natural history of lamellar macular holes in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 152:96–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG et al (2006) Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 113:388–397

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Haritoglou.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Haritoglou und R.G. Schumann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haritoglou, C., Schumann, R.G. Indikation und chirurgisches Vorgehen bei Makulaschichtforamen und Pseudoforamen. Ophthalmologe 114, 1117–1121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-017-0591-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-017-0591-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation