Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Es erfolgen die Darstellung und Diskussion der Indikation zur Operation von Makulaschichtforamen und Pseudoforamen.
Fragestellung
Auf welchen Kriterien basiert die Entscheidung zur chirurgischen Intervention bei einem Schichtforamen und Pseudoforamen der Makula?
Material und Methoden
Der Artikel basiert auf einer Literaturrecherche mit PubMed.
Ergebnisse
Makulaschichtforamina und Pseudoforamina werden in degenerative und traktive Veränderungen unterteilt. Beiden Veränderungen sind relativ typische morphologische Kriterien zugeordnet, die mit dem zu erwartenden funktionellen und morphologischen Ergebnis einer Operation korrelieren. Demnach profitieren eher Patienten mit einem Pseudoforamen von einem operativen Eingriff, da Veränderungen der äußeren Netzhaut in diesen Fällen weniger ausgeprägt sind.
Diskussion
Die mögliche chirurgische Behandlung von Makulaschichtforamina und Pseudoforamina orientiert sich am Typ des Schichtdefekts und seinen morphologischen und funktionellen Besonderheiten.
Abstract
Background
This article presents a discussion on the indications for surgical interventions of lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes.
Objective
What are the criteria for deciding on the surgical intervention for lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes?
Material and methods
The article is based on a literature search in PubMed
Results
Lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes are subdivided into degenerative and tractive alterations. Both entities are associated with relatively specific morphological and functional criteria, which correlate with the expected functional and morphological results of the surgical intervention. Patients with pseudoholes therefore profit more from a surgical intervention because alterations to the outer retina are less pronounced in these cases.
Conclusion
The indications for surgery of lamellar macular holes and pseudoholes are established by the type of lamellar defect and the morphological and functional alterations associated with this condition.
Literatur
Androudi S, Stangos A, Brazikitos PD (2009) Lamllar macular holes: tomographic features and surgical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 148:420–426
Bottoni F, Deiro AP, Giani A, Orini C, Cigada M, Staurenghi C (2013) The natural history of lamellar macular holes: a spectral domain optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:467–475
Compera D, Entchev E, Haritoglou C, Scheler R, Mayer WJ, Wolf A, Kampik A, Schumann RG (2015) Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in comparison to epiretinal membranes of macular pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol 160(2):373–384
Compera D, Schumann RG, Cereda MG, Acquistapace A, Lita V, Priglinger SG, Staurenghi G, Bottoni F (2017) Progression of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation and retinal changes during long-term follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310128
Gass JD (1976) Lamellar macular hole: a complication of cystoid macular edema after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol 94:793–800
Gaudric A, Aloulou Y, Tadayoni R, Massin P (2013) Macular pseudoholes with lamellar cleavage of their edge remain pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol 155:733–742
Govetto A, Dacquay Y, Farajzadeh M, Platner E, Hirabayashi K, Hosseini H, Schwartz SD, Hubschmann J (2016) Lamellar macular hole: two distinct clinical entities? Am J Ophthalmol 164:99–109
Haouchine B, Massin P, Tadayoni R, Erginay A, Gaudric A (2004) Diagnosis of macular Pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 138:732–739
Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, Priglinger SG, Gass CA, Kampik A (2007) Long-term functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 35(3):208–213
Hirota K, Itoh Y, Rii T, Inoue M, Hirakata A (2015) Correlation between foveal interdigitation zone band defect and visual acuity after surgery for macular pseudohole. Retina 35(5):908–914
Lai T, Chen S, Yang C (2016) Epiretinal proliferation in lamellar macular holes and full thicknes macular holes: clinical and surgical outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254:629–638
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Odrobina D, Pikulski Z, Cisiecki S, Dziegielewski K, Nawrocki J (2010) Surgical treatment of lamellar macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1395–1400
Parolini B, Schumann RG, Cereda MG, Haritoglou C, Pertile G (2011) Lamellar macular hole: a clinicopathologic correlation of surgically excised epiretinal membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:9074–9083
Schumann RG, Compera D, Schaumberger M, Wolf A, Fazekas C, Mayer WM, Kampik A, Haritoglou C (2015) Epiretinal membrane characteristics correlate with photoreceptor layer defects in lamellar macular holes and macular pseudoholes. Retina 35(4):727. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000375
Shiraga F, Takasu I, Fukuda K, Fujita T, Yamashita A, Hirooka K, Shirakata Y, Morizane Y, Fujiwara A (2013) Modified vitreous surgery for symptomatic lamellar macular hole with epiretinal membrane containing macular pigment. Retina 33(6):1263–1269
Sun JP, Chen SN, Chuang CC, Lin CW, Lin CJ, Huang JY, Yang CM, Chen MS, Yang CH (2013) Surgical treatment of lamellar macular hole secondary to epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(12):2681–2688
Tanaka Y, Shimada N, Moriyama M et al (2011) Natural history of lamellar macular holes in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 152:96–99
Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG et al (2006) Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 113:388–397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
C. Haritoglou und R.G. Schumann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haritoglou, C., Schumann, R.G. Indikation und chirurgisches Vorgehen bei Makulaschichtforamen und Pseudoforamen. Ophthalmologe 114, 1117–1121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-017-0591-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-017-0591-y
Schlüsselwörter
- Traktives Schichtforamen
- Degeneratives Schichtforamen
- Äußere Netzhautschichten
- Atypisches epiretinales Gewebe
- Morphologische Kriterien